179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21997785)
1. Pelvic discontinuity treated with custom triflange component: a reliable option.
Taunton MJ; Fehring TK; Edwards P; Bernasek T; Holt GE; Christie MJ
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2012 Feb; 470(2):428-34. PubMed ID: 21997785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cup-cage reconstruction for severe acetabular bone loss and pelvic discontinuity: Mid-term Results of a Consecutive Series of 35 Cases.
Hipfl C; Janz V; Löchel J; Perka C; Wassilew GI
Bone Joint J; 2018 Nov; 100-B(11):1442-1448. PubMed ID: 30418066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The patient-specific Triflange acetabular implant for revision total hip arthroplasty in patients with severe acetabular defects: planning, implantation, and results.
Berend ME; Berend KR; Lombardi AV; Cates H; Faris P
Bone Joint J; 2018 Jan; 100-B(1 Supple A):50-54. PubMed ID: 29292340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Survivorship and Clinical Outcomes of Custom Triflange Acetabular Components in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review.
De Martino I; Strigelli V; Cacciola G; Gu A; Bostrom MP; Sculco PK
J Arthroplasty; 2019 Oct; 34(10):2511-2518. PubMed ID: 31213338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Custom-made triflanged implants in reconstruction of severe acetabular bone loss with pelvic discontinuity after total hip arthroplasty consecutive cohort study : two to 11 years of follow-up.
Winther SS; Petersen M; Yilmaz M; Kaltoft NS; Stürup J; Winther NS
Bone Jt Open; 2022 Nov; 3(11):867-876. PubMed ID: 36354058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Tantalum Components in Difficult Acetabular Revisions Have Good Survival at 5 to 10 Years: Longer Term Followup of a Previous Report.
Lachiewicz PF; O'Dell JA
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2018 Feb; 476(2):336-342. PubMed ID: 29529665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Double-trabecular metal cup technique for the management of Paprosky type III defects without pelvic discontinuity.
Loppini M; Schiavi P; Rocca AD; Traverso F; Rocca FD; Mazziotta G; Astore F; Grappiolo G
Hip Int; 2018 Nov; 28(2_suppl):66-72. PubMed ID: 30755117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The Safe Zone Range for Cup Anteversion Is Narrower Than for Inclination in THA.
Murphy WS; Yun HH; Hayden B; Kowal JH; Murphy SB
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2018 Feb; 476(2):325-335. PubMed ID: 29529664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Superior Pubic Ramus Screw Placement During Complex Acetabular Revision: Acetabular Distraction for Treatment of Pelvic Discontinuity.
Kerbel YE; Pirruccio K; Shirley Z; Stanzione S; Eachempati KK; Melnic CM; Sheth NP
JBJS Essent Surg Tech; 2022; 12(3):e21.00014. PubMed ID: 36816529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Custom Triflange Acetabular Implants: Average 10-Year Follow-Up.
Meding JB; Meding LK
J Arthroplasty; 2023 Jul; 38(7S):S201-S205. PubMed ID: 36958713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Two-centre radiological survivorship of acetabular distraction technique for treatment of chronic pelvic discontinuity: mean five-year follow-up.
Sheth NP; Melnic CM; Brown N; Sporer SM; Paprosky WG
Bone Joint J; 2018 Jul; 100-B(7):909-914. PubMed ID: 29954194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Novel Acetabular Cup for Revision THA Improves Hip Center of Rotation: A Radiographic Evaluation.
Khlopas A; Chughtai M; Elmallah RK; Hip-Flores D; Malkani AL; Harwin SF; Mont MA; Ries MD
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2018 Feb; 476(2):315-322. PubMed ID: 29529662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Midterm Survivorship After Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty With a Custom Triflange Acetabular Component.
Gladnick BP; Fehring KA; Odum SM; Christie MJ; DeBoer DK; Fehring TK
J Arthroplasty; 2018 Feb; 33(2):500-504. PubMed ID: 29033157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Virtual biomechanical assessment of porous tantalum and custom triflange components in the treatment of patients with acetabular defects and pelvic discontinuity.
Callary SA; Broekhuis D; Barends J; Ramasamy B; Nelissen RGHH; Solomon LB; Kaptein BL
Bone Joint J; 2024 May; 106-B(5 Supple B):74-81. PubMed ID: 38688495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Custom Triflange Cups: 20-Year Experience.
Sershon RA; McDonald JF; Nagda S; Hamilton WG; Engh CA
J Arthroplasty; 2021 Sep; 36(9):3264-3268. PubMed ID: 34074542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Outcomes of Acetabular Reconstructions for the Management of Chronic Pelvic Discontinuity: A Systematic Review.
Malahias MA; Ma QL; Gu A; Ward SE; Alexiades MM; Sculco PK
J Arthroplasty; 2020 Apr; 35(4):1145-1153.e2. PubMed ID: 31784362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Reconstruction of acetabular defects with porous tantalum shells and augments in revision total hip arthroplasty at ten-year follow-up.
Löchel J; Janz V; Hipfl C; Perka C; Wassilew GI
Bone Joint J; 2019 Mar; 101-B(3):311-316. PubMed ID: 30813786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cup-cage constructs in revision total hip arthroplasty for pelvic discontinuity.
Chaudhry F; Daud A; Greenberg A; Braunstein D; Safir OA; Gross AE; Kuzyk PR
Bone Joint J; 2024 May; 106-B(5 Supple B):66-73. PubMed ID: 38688477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. TOTAL HIP JOINT REPLACEMENT USING A CUSTOM TRIFLANGE ACETABULAR COMPONENT (LITERATURE REVIEW).
Galuzinskii O; Chornyi V; Kozik Y; Fedin Y
Wiad Lek; 2023; 76(12):2694-2699. PubMed ID: 38290035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The augment-and-modular-cage revision system for reconstruction of severe acetabular defects-two-year clinical and radiographic results.
Roessler PP; Jaenisch M; Kuhlmann M; Wacker M; Johannes Wagenhäuser P; Gravius S; Wirtz DC
Int Orthop; 2019 Oct; 43(10):2269-2278. PubMed ID: 30539219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
