These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

391 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21997898)

  • 1. Limitations of current definitions of miscarriage using mean gestational sac diameter and crown-rump length measurements: a multicenter observational study.
    Abdallah Y; Daemen A; Kirk E; Pexsters A; Naji O; Stalder C; Gould D; Ahmed S; Guha S; Syed S; Bottomley C; Timmerman D; Bourne T
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Nov; 38(5):497-502. PubMed ID: 21997898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Gestational sac and embryonic growth are not useful as criteria to define miscarriage: a multicenter observational study.
    Abdallah Y; Daemen A; Guha S; Syed S; Naji O; Pexsters A; Kirk E; Stalder C; Gould D; Ahmed S; Bottomley C; Timmerman D; Bourne T
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Nov; 38(5):503-9. PubMed ID: 21858883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Defining safe criteria to diagnose miscarriage: prospective observational multicentre study.
    Preisler J; Kopeika J; Ismail L; Vathanan V; Farren J; Abdallah Y; Battacharjee P; Van Holsbeke C; Bottomley C; Gould D; Johnson S; Stalder C; Van Calster B; Hamilton J; Timmerman D; Bourne T
    BMJ; 2015 Sep; 351():h4579. PubMed ID: 26400869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Clinical implications of intra- and interobserver reproducibility of transvaginal sonographic measurement of gestational sac and crown-rump length at 6-9 weeks' gestation.
    Pexsters A; Luts J; Van Schoubroeck D; Bottomley C; Van Calster B; Van Huffel S; Abdallah Y; D'Hooghe T; Lees C; Timmerman D; Bourne T
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Nov; 38(5):510-5. PubMed ID: 21077156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Difference between mean gestational sac diameter and crown-rump length as a marker of first-trimester pregnancy loss after in vitro fertilization.
    Kapfhamer JD; Palaniappan S; Summers K; Kassel K; Mancuso AC; Ryan GL; Shah DK
    Fertil Steril; 2018 Jan; 109(1):130-136. PubMed ID: 29175064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Measurement error of mean sac diameter and crown-rump length among pregnant women at Mulago hospital, Uganda.
    Ali S; Byanyima RK; Ononge S; Ictho J; Nyamwiza J; Loro ELE; Mukisa J; Musewa A; Nalutaaya A; Ssenyonga R; Kawooya I; Temper B; Katamba A; Kalyango J; Karamagi C
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2018 May; 18(1):129. PubMed ID: 29728143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. When is a pregnancy nonviable and what criteria should be used to define miscarriage?
    Bourne T; Bottomley C
    Fertil Steril; 2012 Nov; 98(5):1091-6. PubMed ID: 23084011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A logistic model to predict early pregnancy loss following in vitro fertilization based on 2601 infertility patients.
    Yi Y; Lu G; Ouyang Y; lin G; Gong F; Li X
    Reprod Biol Endocrinol; 2016 Mar; 14():15. PubMed ID: 27036944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Re: limitations of current definitions of miscarriage using mean gestational sac diameter and crown-rump length measurements: a multicenter observational study.
    Ross JA; Johns J
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Mar; 39(3):362-3; author reply 364-5. PubMed ID: 22535631
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Re: limitations of current definitions of miscarriage using mean gestational sac diameter and crown-rump length measurements: a multicenter observational study.
    Jurkovic D
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Mar; 39(3):361; author reply 362. PubMed ID: 22535629
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Can a smaller than expected crown-rump length reliably predict the occurrence of subsequent miscarriage in a viable first trimester pregnancy?
    Abuelghar WM; Fathi HM; Ellaithy MI; Anwar MA
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2013 Oct; 39(10):1449-55. PubMed ID: 23815274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Prediction of subsequent miscarriage risk in women who present with a viable pregnancy at the first early pregnancy scan.
    Stamatopoulos N; Lu C; Casikar I; Reid S; Mongelli M; Hardy N; Condous G
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2015 Oct; 55(5):464-72. PubMed ID: 26294017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Normal ranges of embryonic length, embryonic heart rate, gestational sac diameter and yolk sac diameter at 6-10 weeks.
    Papaioannou GI; Syngelaki A; Poon LC; Ross JA; Nicolaides KH
    Fetal Diagn Ther; 2010; 28(4):207-19. PubMed ID: 20847544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Ultrasonographic prediction of early miscarriage.
    Papaioannou GI; Syngelaki A; Maiz N; Ross JA; Nicolaides KH
    Hum Reprod; 2011 Jul; 26(7):1685-92. PubMed ID: 21531997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Functional linear discriminant analysis: a new longitudinal approach to the assessment of embryonic growth.
    Bottomley C; Daemen A; Mukri F; Papageorghiou AT; Kirk E; Pexsters A; De Moor B; Timmerman D; Bourne T
    Hum Reprod; 2009 Feb; 24(2):278-83. PubMed ID: 18978027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [French guidelines for diagnostic criteria for nonviable pregnancy early in the first trimester and for management of threatened miscarriage and nonviable pregnancy (except uterine evacuation)].
    Lavoué V; Huchon C; Deffieux X; Voltzenlogel MC; Vandenbroucke L; Levêque J
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2014 Dec; 43(10):776-93. PubMed ID: 25447361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Ultrasound prediction of risk of spontaneous miscarriage in live embryos from assisted conceptions.
    Choong S; Rombauts L; Ugoni A; Meagher S
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Dec; 22(6):571-7. PubMed ID: 14689528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. First-trimester ultrasound features associated with subsequent miscarriage: A prospective study.
    Taylor TJ; Quinton AE; de Vries BS; Hyett JA
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2019 Oct; 59(5):641-648. PubMed ID: 30724337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Current ultrasonographic criteria for miscarriage could lead to misdiagnosis, say researchers.
    Wise J
    BMJ; 2011 Oct; 343():d6665. PubMed ID: 22001784
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. First-trimester detection of amniotic sac in relation to miscarriage.
    Ikegawa A
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 1997 Jun; 23(3):283-8. PubMed ID: 9255043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.