These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

209 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21998574)

  • 1. Estimating the relevance of world disturbances to explain savings, interference and long-term motor adaptation effects.
    Berniker M; Kording KP
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2011 Oct; 7(10):e1002210. PubMed ID: 21998574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Explaining savings for visuomotor adaptation: linear time-invariant state-space models are not sufficient.
    Zarahn E; Weston GD; Liang J; Mazzoni P; Krakauer JW
    J Neurophysiol; 2008 Nov; 100(5):2537-48. PubMed ID: 18596178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Both fast and slow learning processes contribute to savings following sensorimotor adaptation.
    Coltman SK; Cashaback JGA; Gribble PL
    J Neurophysiol; 2019 Apr; 121(4):1575-1583. PubMed ID: 30840553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Estimating the sources of motor errors for adaptation and generalization.
    Berniker M; Kording K
    Nat Neurosci; 2008 Dec; 11(12):1454-61. PubMed ID: 19011624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Relevance of error: what drives motor adaptation?
    Wei K; Körding K
    J Neurophysiol; 2009 Feb; 101(2):655-64. PubMed ID: 19019979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Characterization of age-related modifications of upper limb motor control strategies in a new dynamic environment.
    Cesqui B; Macrì G; Dario P; Micera S
    J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2008 Nov; 5():31. PubMed ID: 19019228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Anodal motor cortex stimulation paired with movement repetition increases anterograde interference but not savings.
    Leow LA; Hammond G; de Rugy A
    Eur J Neurosci; 2014 Oct; 40(8):3243-52. PubMed ID: 25160706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Interacting adaptive processes with different timescales underlie short-term motor learning.
    Smith MA; Ghazizadeh A; Shadmehr R
    PLoS Biol; 2006 Jun; 4(6):e179. PubMed ID: 16700627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. On the encoding capacity of human motor adaptation.
    Kim S; Kwon J; Kim JM; Park FC; Yeo SH
    J Neurophysiol; 2021 Jul; 126(1):123-139. PubMed ID: 34077281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The 24-h savings of adaptation to novel movement dynamics initially reflects the recall of previous performance.
    Nguyen KP; Zhou W; McKenna E; Colucci-Chang K; Bray LCJ; Hosseini EA; Alhussein L; Rezazad M; Joiner WM
    J Neurophysiol; 2019 Sep; 122(3):933-946. PubMed ID: 31291156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Null effects of levodopa on reward- and error-based motor adaptation, savings, and anterograde interference.
    Palidis DJ; McGregor HR; Vo A; MacDonald PA; Gribble PL
    J Neurophysiol; 2021 Jul; 126(1):47-67. PubMed ID: 34038228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Trial-by-trial adaptation of movements during mental practice under force field.
    Anwar MN; Khan SH
    Comput Math Methods Med; 2013; 2013():109497. PubMed ID: 23737857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reduction in learning rates associated with anterograde interference results from interactions between different timescales in motor adaptation.
    Sing GC; Smith MA
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2010 Aug; 6(8):. PubMed ID: 20808880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Prior Movement of One Arm Facilitates Motor Adaptation in the Other.
    Gippert M; Leupold S; Heed T; Howard IS; Villringer A; Nikulin VV; Sehm B
    J Neurosci; 2023 Jun; 43(23):4341-4351. PubMed ID: 37160362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Minimizing Precision-Weighted Sensory Prediction Errors via Memory Formation and Switching in Motor Adaptation.
    Oh Y; Schweighofer N
    J Neurosci; 2019 Nov; 39(46):9237-9250. PubMed ID: 31582527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Motion state-dependent motor learning based on explicit visual feedback is quickly recalled, but is less stable than adaptation to physical perturbations.
    Zhou W; Kruse EA; Brower R; North R; Joiner WM
    J Neurophysiol; 2022 Oct; 128(4):854-871. PubMed ID: 36043804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Rethinking motor learning and savings in adaptation paradigms: model-free memory for successful actions combines with internal models.
    Huang VS; Haith A; Mazzoni P; Krakauer JW
    Neuron; 2011 May; 70(4):787-801. PubMed ID: 21609832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Neural Tuning Functions Underlie Both Generalization and Interference.
    Howard IS; Franklin DW
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(6):e0131268. PubMed ID: 26110871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Time course of changes in the long-latency feedback response parallels the fast process of short-term motor adaptation.
    Coltman SK; Gribble PL
    J Neurophysiol; 2020 Aug; 124(2):388-399. PubMed ID: 32639925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Savings in Human Force Field Learning Supported by Feedback Adaptation.
    Mathew J; Lefèvre P; Crevecoeur F
    eNeuro; 2021; 8(5):. PubMed ID: 34465612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.