These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21998715)

  • 1. The syntactic and semantic processing of mass and count nouns: an ERP study.
    Chiarelli V; El Yagoubi R; Mondini S; Bisiacchi P; Semenza C
    PLoS One; 2011; 6(10):e25885. PubMed ID: 21998715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Interplay between syntax and semantics during sentence comprehension: ERP effects of combining syntactic and semantic violations.
    Hagoort P
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2003 Aug; 15(6):883-99. PubMed ID: 14511541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. How the mass counts: an electrophysiological approach to the processing of lexical features.
    Steinhauer K; Pancheva R; Newman AJ; Gennari S; Ullman MT
    Neuroreport; 2001 Apr; 12(5):999-1005. PubMed ID: 11303776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Localization of syntactic and semantic brain responses using magnetoencephalography.
    Service E; Helenius P; Maury S; Salmelin R
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2007 Jul; 19(7):1193-205. PubMed ID: 17583994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Syntactic gender and semantic expectancy: ERPs reveal early autonomy and late interaction.
    Gunter TC; Friederici AD; Schriefers H
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2000 Jul; 12(4):556-68. PubMed ID: 10936910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Is animacy special? ERP correlates of semantic violations and animacy violations in sentence processing.
    Szewczyk JM; Schriefers H
    Brain Res; 2011 Jan; 1368():208-21. PubMed ID: 21029726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Melodic pitch expectation interacts with neural responses to syntactic but not semantic violations.
    Carrus E; Pearce MT; Bhattacharya J
    Cortex; 2013 Sep; 49(8):2186-200. PubMed ID: 23141867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cortical brain responses to semantic incongruity and syntactic violation in Italian language: an event-related potential study.
    Angrilli A; Penolazzi B; Vespignani F; De Vincenzi M; Job R; Ciccarelli L; Palomba D; Stegagno L
    Neurosci Lett; 2002 Mar; 322(1):5-8. PubMed ID: 11958830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An event-related potential study of the concreteness effect between Chinese nouns and verbs.
    Tsai PS; Yu BH; Lee CY; Tzeng OJ; Hung DL; Wu DH
    Brain Res; 2009 Feb; 1253():149-60. PubMed ID: 19059223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Syntax does not necessarily precede semantics in sentence processing: ERP evidence from Chinese.
    Zhang Y; Li P; Piao Q; Liu Y; Huang Y; Shu H
    Brain Lang; 2013 Jul; 126(1):8-19. PubMed ID: 23648559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. How is sentence processing affected by external semantic and syntactic information? Evidence from event-related potentials.
    Schacht A; Martín-Loeches M; Casado P; Abdel Rahman R; Sel A; Sommer W
    PLoS One; 2010 Mar; 5(3):e9742. PubMed ID: 20305820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Semantic and syntactic aspects of the mass/count distinction: a case study of semantic dementia.
    Taler V; Jarema G; Saumier D
    Brain Cogn; 2005 Apr; 57(3):222-5. PubMed ID: 15780454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Semantics prevalence over syntax during sentence processing: a brain potential study of noun-adjective agreement in Spanish.
    Martín-Loeches M; Nigbur R; Casado P; Hohlfeld A; Sommer W
    Brain Res; 2006 Jun; 1093(1):178-89. PubMed ID: 16678138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Differential electrophysiological signatures of semantic and syntactic scene processing.
    Võ ML; Wolfe JM
    Psychol Sci; 2013 Sep; 24(9):1816-23. PubMed ID: 23842954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Conflict and surrender during sentence processing: an ERP study of syntax-semantics interaction.
    Kim A; Sikos L
    Brain Lang; 2011 Jul; 118(1-2):15-22. PubMed ID: 21481924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Semantic and syntactic processing of mass and count nouns: data from dementia.
    Mondini S; Arcara G; Jarema G
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2014; 36(9):967-80. PubMed ID: 25264222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Electrophysiological signatures of event words: Dissociating syntactic and semantic category effects in lexical processing.
    Lapinskaya N; Uzomah U; Bedny M; Lau E
    Neuropsychologia; 2016 Dec; 93(Pt A):151-157. PubMed ID: 27794431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The role of semantics and repair processes in article-noun gender disagreement in Italian: An ERP study.
    Popov S; Miceli G; Ćurčić-Blake B; Bastiaanse R
    Brain Lang; 2020 Jul; 206():104787. PubMed ID: 32244057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Event-related potentials suggest early interaction between syntax and semantics during on-line sentence comprehension.
    Palolahti M; Leino S; Jokela M; Kopra K; Paavilainen P
    Neurosci Lett; 2005 Aug; 384(3):222-7. PubMed ID: 15894426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Concreteness effects in semantic processing: ERP evidence supporting dual-coding theory.
    Kounios J; Holcomb PJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1994 Jul; 20(4):804-23. PubMed ID: 8064248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.