BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

209 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21999764)

  • 1. A novel technique for fetal heart rate estimation from Doppler ultrasound signal.
    Jezewski J; Roj D; Wrobel J; Horoba K
    Biomed Eng Online; 2011 Oct; 10():92. PubMed ID: 21999764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. New Method for Beat-to-Beat Fetal Heart Rate Measurement Using Doppler Ultrasound Signal.
    Kupka T; Matonia A; Jezewski M; Jezewski J; Horoba K; Wrobel J; Czabanski R; Martinek R
    Sensors (Basel); 2020 Jul; 20(15):. PubMed ID: 32707863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An open source autocorrelation-based method for fetal heart rate estimation from one-dimensional Doppler ultrasound.
    Valderrama CE; Stroux L; Katebi N; Paljug E; Hall-Clifford R; Rohloff P; Marzbanrad F; Clifford GD
    Physiol Meas; 2019 Feb; 40(2):025005. PubMed ID: 30699403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of doppler ultrasound and direct electrocardiography acquisition techniques for quantification of fetal heart rate variability.
    Jezewski J; Wrobel J; Horoba K
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2006 May; 53(5):855-64. PubMed ID: 16686408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A Robust Approach Assisted by Signal Quality Assessment for Fetal Heart Rate Estimation from Doppler Ultrasound Signal.
    Shi X; Niida N; Yamamoto K; Ohtsuki T; Matsui Y; Owada K
    Sensors (Basel); 2023 Dec; 23(24):. PubMed ID: 38139544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Unsupervised hidden semi-Markov model for automatic beat onset detection in 1D Doppler ultrasound.
    Katebi N; Marzbanrad F; Stroux L; Valderrama CE; Clifford GD
    Physiol Meas; 2020 Sep; 41(8):085007. PubMed ID: 32585651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Extraction of fetal heart-rate signal as the time event series from evenly sampled data acquired using Doppler ultrasound technique.
    Jezewski J; Kupka T; Horoba K
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2008 Feb; 55(2 Pt 1):805-10. PubMed ID: 18270022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The influence of coincidence of fetal and maternal QRS complexes on fetal heart rate reliability.
    Matonia A; Jezewski J; Kupka T; Horoba K; Wrobel J; Gacek A
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 2006 May; 44(5):393-403. PubMed ID: 16937181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Adaptive filtering in ECG monitoring of the fetal heart rate.
    Frank TH; Blaumanis OR; Gibbs RK; Wells RK
    J Electrocardiol; 1987 Oct; 20 Suppl():108-13. PubMed ID: 3694088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A new algorithm for detecting fetal heart rate using ultrasound Doppler signals.
    Hua X; Kaiqing L; Zhenxi Z
    Ultrasonics; 2005 May; 43(6):399-403. PubMed ID: 15823314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The influence of signal loss on the comparison between computer analyses of the fetal heart rate in labour using pulsed Doppler ultrasound (with autocorrelation) and simultaneous scalp electrocardiogram.
    Spencer JA; Belcher R; Dawes GS
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 1987 May; 25(1):29-34. PubMed ID: 3297840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Studies on the cardiotocograms recorded by a new system with 1 MHz ultrasound and autocorrelation heart rate meter].
    Sawazumi K; Nagata N; Irie T; Maeda K
    Nihon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi; 1988 May; 40(5):555-60. PubMed ID: 3290362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Determination of fetal heart rate from abdominal signals: evaluation of beat-to-beat accuracy in relation to the direct fetal electrocardiogram.
    Jezewski J; Matonia A; Kupka T; Roj D; Czabanski R
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 2012 Oct; 57(5):383-94. PubMed ID: 25854665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Is Abdominal Fetal Electrocardiography an Alternative to Doppler Ultrasound for FHR Variability Evaluation?
    Jezewski J; Wrobel J; Matonia A; Horoba K; Martinek R; Kupka T; Jezewski M
    Front Physiol; 2017; 8():305. PubMed ID: 28559852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The information content of Doppler ultrasound signals from the fetal heart.
    Shakespeare SA; Crowe JA; Hayes-Gill BR; Bhogal K; James DK
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 2001 Nov; 39(6):619-26. PubMed ID: 11804166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dynamic segmentation and linear prediction for maternal ECG removal in antenatal abdominal recordings.
    Vullings R; Peters CH; Sluijter RJ; Mischi M; Oei SG; Bergmans JW
    Physiol Meas; 2009 Mar; 30(3):291-307. PubMed ID: 19223679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Doppler Ultrasound Technology for Fetal Heart Rate Monitoring: A Review.
    Hamelmann P; Vullings R; Kolen AF; Bergmans JWM; van Laar JOEH; Tortoli P; Mischi M
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2020 Feb; 67(2):226-238. PubMed ID: 31562079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Surveillance of growth-retarded fetuses with computerized fetal heart rate monitoring combined with Doppler velocimetry of the umbilical and uterine arteries.
    Weiner Z; Farmakides G; Schulman H; Lopresti S; Schneider E
    J Reprod Med; 1996 Feb; 41(2):112-8. PubMed ID: 8656410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. New estimators and guidelines for better use of fetal heart rate estimators with Doppler ultrasound devices.
    Voicu I; Ménigot S; Kouamé D; Girault JM
    Comput Math Methods Med; 2014; 2014():784862. PubMed ID: 24624224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Monitoring the fetal heart non-invasively: a review of methods.
    Peters M; Crowe J; Piéri JF; Quartero H; Hayes-Gill B; James D; Stinstra J; Shakespeare S
    J Perinat Med; 2001; 29(5):408-16. PubMed ID: 11723842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.