These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

237 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21999884)

  • 21. Electromagnetic safety of children using wireless phones: a literature review.
    Martens L
    Bioelectromagnetics; 2005; Suppl 7():S133-7. PubMed ID: 16059915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Differences in RF energy absorption in the heads of adults and children.
    Christ A; Kuster N
    Bioelectromagnetics; 2005; Suppl 7():S31-44. PubMed ID: 16142771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Assessment of SAR and thermal changes near a cochlear implant system for mobile phone type exposures.
    McIntosh RL; Iskra S; McKenzie RJ; Chambers J; Metzenthen B; Anderson V
    Bioelectromagnetics; 2008 Jan; 29(1):71-80. PubMed ID: 17902159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Dominant factors influencing whole-body average SAR due to far-field exposure in whole-body resonance frequency and GHz regions.
    Hirata A; Kodera S; Wang J; Fujiwara O
    Bioelectromagnetics; 2007 Sep; 28(6):484-7. PubMed ID: 17486582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [Polish guidelines of 2001 for maximum admissible intensities in high frequency EMF versus European Union recommendations].
    Aniołczyk H
    Med Pr; 2003; 54(2):181-7. PubMed ID: 12924002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Children and adults exposed to electromagnetic fields at the ICNIRP reference levels: theoretical assessment of the induced peak temperature increase.
    Bakker JF; Paulides MM; Neufeld E; Christ A; Kuster N; van Rhoon GC
    Phys Med Biol; 2011 Aug; 56(15):4967-89. PubMed ID: 21772085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Specific absorption rate evaluation for passengers using wireless communication devices inside vehicles with different handedness, passenger counts, and seating locations.
    Leung SW; Diao Y; Chan KH; Siu YM; Wu Y
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2012 Oct; 59(10):2905-12. PubMed ID: 22893364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Determination of safety distance limits for a human near a cellular base station antenna, adopting the IEEE standard or ICNIRP guidelines.
    Cooper J; Marx B; Buhl J; Hombach V
    Bioelectromagnetics; 2002 Sep; 23(6):429-43. PubMed ID: 12210561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Mobile phone base station-emitted radiation does not induce phosphorylation of Hsp27.
    Hirose H; Sakuma N; Kaji N; Nakayama K; Inoue K; Sekijima M; Nojima T; Miyakoshi J
    Bioelectromagnetics; 2007 Feb; 28(2):99-108. PubMed ID: 17004241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Metal-framed spectacles and implants and specific absorption rate among adults and children using mobile phones at 900/1800/2100 MHz.
    Joó E; Szász A; Szendrö P
    Electromagn Biol Med; 2006; 25(2):103-12. PubMed ID: 16771299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Assessment of the radio-frequency electromagnetic fields induced in the human body from mobile phones used with hands-free kits.
    Kühn S; Cabot E; Christ A; Capstick M; Kuster N
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 Sep; 54(18):5493-508. PubMed ID: 19706964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Testing the effectiveness of small radiation shields for mobile phones.
    Oliver JP; Chou CK; Balzano Q
    Bioelectromagnetics; 2003 Jan; 24(1):66-9. PubMed ID: 12483667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. On the safety assessment of human exposure in the proximity of cellular communications base-station antennas at 900, 1800 and 2170 MHz.
    Martínez-Búrdalo M; Martín A; Anguiano M; Villar R
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Sep; 50(17):4125-37. PubMed ID: 16177535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Personal exposure to mobile phone frequencies and well-being in adults: a cross-sectional study based on dosimetry.
    Thomas S; Kühnlein A; Heinrich S; Praml G; Nowak D; von Kries R; Radon K
    Bioelectromagnetics; 2008 Sep; 29(6):463-70. PubMed ID: 18393264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Subjective symptoms among mobile phone users--a consequence of absorption of radiofrequency fields?
    Wilén J; Sandström M; Hansson Mild K
    Bioelectromagnetics; 2003 Apr; 24(3):152-9. PubMed ID: 12669297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A comparison of important international and national standards for limiting exposure to EMF including the scientific rationale.
    Roy CR; Martin LJ
    Health Phys; 2007 Jun; 92(6):635-41. PubMed ID: 17495666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Scientific evidence invalidates health assumptions underlying the FCC and ICNIRP exposure limit determinations for radiofrequency radiation: implications for 5G.
    International Commission on the Biological Effects of Electromagnetic Fields (ICBE-EMF)
    Environ Health; 2022 Oct; 21(1):92. PubMed ID: 36253855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Biological effects from electromagnetic field exposure and public exposure standards.
    Hardell L; Sage C
    Biomed Pharmacother; 2008 Feb; 62(2):104-9. PubMed ID: 18242044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Proliferation and apoptosis in a neuroblastoma cell line exposed to 900 MHz modulated radiofrequency field.
    Merola P; Marino C; Lovisolo GA; Pinto R; Laconi C; Negroni A
    Bioelectromagnetics; 2006 Apr; 27(3):164-71. PubMed ID: 16437547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Analysis of RF exposure in the head tissues of children and adults.
    Wiart J; Hadjem A; Wong MF; Bloch I
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 Jul; 53(13):3681-95. PubMed ID: 18562780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.