These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

293 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22000212)

  • 1. Subtracting "ought" from "is": descriptivism versus normativism in the study of human thinking.
    Elqayam S; Evans JS
    Behav Brain Sci; 2011 Oct; 34(5):233-48; discussion 249-90. PubMed ID: 22000212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The intersection between Descriptivism and Meliorism in reasoning research: further proposals in support of 'soft normativism'.
    Stupple EJ; Ball LJ
    Front Psychol; 2014; 5():1269. PubMed ID: 25414687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. When one model casts doubt on another: a levels-of-analysis approach to causal discounting.
    Khemlani SS; Oppenheimer DM
    Psychol Bull; 2011 Mar; 137(2):195-210. PubMed ID: 21142348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Conflict monitoring in dual process theories of thinking.
    De Neys W; Glumicic T
    Cognition; 2008 Mar; 106(3):1248-99. PubMed ID: 17631876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reasoning with conditionals: a test of formal models of four theories.
    Oberauer K
    Cogn Psychol; 2006 Nov; 53(3):238-83. PubMed ID: 16729993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Précis of bayesian rationality: The probabilistic approach to human reasoning.
    Oaksford M; Chater N
    Behav Brain Sci; 2009 Feb; 32(1):69-84; discussion 85-120. PubMed ID: 19210833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cognitive Success: A Consequentialist Account of Rationality in Cognition.
    Schurz G; Hertwig R
    Top Cogn Sci; 2019 Jan; 11(1):7-36. PubMed ID: 30663854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Appropriate methodologies for empirical bioethics: it's all relative.
    Ives J; Draper H
    Bioethics; 2009 May; 23(4):249-58. PubMed ID: 19338525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Causality in thought.
    Sloman SA; Lagnado D
    Annu Rev Psychol; 2015 Jan; 66():223-47. PubMed ID: 25061673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Popper and the problem of induction in epidemiology].
    Banegas JR; Rodríguez Artalejo F; del Rey Calero J
    Rev Esp Salud Publica; 2000; 74(4):327-39. PubMed ID: 11031841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. In search of counter-examples: deductive rationality in human reasoning.
    Schroyens W; Schaeken W; Handley S
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2003 Oct; 56(7):1129-45. PubMed ID: 12959907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Are theories to be evaluated in isolation or relative to alternatives? An abductive view.
    Capaldi EJ; Proctor RW
    Am J Psychol; 2008; 121(4):617-41. PubMed ID: 19105581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Belief inhibition during thinking: not always winning but at least taking part.
    De Neys W; Franssens S
    Cognition; 2009 Oct; 113(1):45-61. PubMed ID: 19703685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Theoretical thinking in nursing: problems and prospects.
    Kim HS
    Recent Adv Nurs; 1989; 24():106-22. PubMed ID: 2813846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. How experience confronts ethics.
    Hoffmaster B; Hooker C
    Bioethics; 2009 May; 23(4):214-25. PubMed ID: 19338522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Negations in syllogistic reasoning: evidence for a heuristic-analytic conflict.
    Stupple EJ; Waterhouse EF
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Aug; 62(8):1533-41. PubMed ID: 19370481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evidence for practice, epistemology, and critical reflection.
    Avis M; Freshwater D
    Nurs Philos; 2006 Oct; 7(4):216-24. PubMed ID: 16965303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Dual processing and diagnostic errors.
    Norman G
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2009 Sep; 14 Suppl 1():37-49. PubMed ID: 19669921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Understanding our mistakes: a primer on errors in clinical reasoning.
    Kempainen RR; Migeon MB; Wolf FM
    Med Teach; 2003 Mar; 25(2):177-81. PubMed ID: 12745527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Pseudodiagnosticity revisited.
    Crupi V; Tentori K; Lombardi L
    Psychol Rev; 2009 Oct; 116(4):971-85. PubMed ID: 19839693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.