116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22000329)
1. Adjusting for the proportion of cancer deaths in the general population when using relative survival: a sensitivity analysis.
Hinchliffe SR; Dickman PW; Lambert PC
Cancer Epidemiol; 2012 Apr; 36(2):148-52. PubMed ID: 22000329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Estimating expected survival probabilities for relative survival analysis--exploring the impact of including cancer patient mortality in the calculations.
Talbäck M; Dickman PW
Eur J Cancer; 2011 Nov; 47(17):2626-32. PubMed ID: 21924892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Trends in the survival of patients diagnosed with cancer in the Nordic countries 1964-2003 followed up to the end of 2006. Material and methods.
Engholm G; Gislum M; Bray F; Hakulinen T
Acta Oncol; 2010 Jun; 49(5):545-60. PubMed ID: 20491523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cancer survival in five continents: a worldwide population-based study (CONCORD).
Coleman MP; Quaresma M; Berrino F; Lutz JM; De Angelis R; Capocaccia R; Baili P; Rachet B; Gatta G; Hakulinen T; Micheli A; Sant M; Weir HK; Elwood JM; Tsukuma H; Koifman S; E Silva GA; Francisci S; Santaquilani M; Verdecchia A; Storm HH; Young JL;
Lancet Oncol; 2008 Aug; 9(8):730-56. PubMed ID: 18639491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Trends in the overall survival of cancer patients diagnosed 1964-2003 in the Nordic countries followed up to the end of 2006: the importance of case-mix.
Storm HH; Kejs AM; Engholm G; Tryggvadóttir L; Klint A; Bray F; Hakulinen T
Acta Oncol; 2010 Jun; 49(5):713-24. PubMed ID: 20491527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prophylactic Oophorectomy: Reducing the U.S. Death Rate from Epithelial Ovarian Cancer. A Continuing Debate.
Piver MS
Oncologist; 1996; 1(5):326-330. PubMed ID: 10388011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Trends in survival of patients diagnosed with male genital cancers in the Nordic countries 1964-2003 followed up until the end of 2006.
Bray F; Klint A; Gislum M; Hakulinen T; Engholm G; Tryggvadóttir L; Storm HH
Acta Oncol; 2010 Jun; 49(5):644-54. PubMed ID: 20151937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Reduction of population-based cancer survival estimates by trace back of death certificate notifications: an empirical illustration.
Holleczek B; Brenner H
Eur J Cancer; 2012 Apr; 48(6):797-804. PubMed ID: 21703847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Choosing the relative survival method for cancer survival estimation.
Hakulinen T; Seppä K; Lambert PC
Eur J Cancer; 2011 Sep; 47(14):2202-10. PubMed ID: 21549589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cancer survival in Kentucky and health insurance coverage.
McDavid K; Tucker TC; Sloggett A; Coleman MP
Arch Intern Med; 2003 Oct; 163(18):2135-44. PubMed ID: 14557210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Reduction in selective under-ascertainment bias in population-based estimates of cancer patient survival by age adjustment.
Brenner H; Hakulinen T
Eur J Cancer; 2005 Aug; 41(12):1788-93. PubMed ID: 16043349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cancer survival analysis in Hamburg 1995-2003: assessing the data quality within a population-based registry.
Nennecke AL; Hentschel S; Reintjes R
Acta Oncol; 2009; 48(1):34-43. PubMed ID: 18607873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. How to interpret the relative survival ratios of cancer patients.
Pokhrel A; Hakulinen T
Eur J Cancer; 2008 Nov; 44(17):2661-7. PubMed ID: 18819791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Trends in survival of patients diagnosed with cancers of the brain and nervous system, thyroid, eye, bone, and soft tissues in the Nordic countries 1964-2003 followed up until the end of 2006.
Bray F; Engholm G; Hakulinen T; Gislum M; Tryggvadóttir L; Storm HH; Klint A
Acta Oncol; 2010 Jun; 49(5):673-93. PubMed ID: 20192877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Quantifying differences in breast cancer survival between England and Norway.
Lambert PC; Holmberg L; Sandin F; Bray F; Linklater KM; Purushotham A; Robinson D; Møller H
Cancer Epidemiol; 2011 Dec; 35(6):526-33. PubMed ID: 21606014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Multiple tumours in survival estimates.
Rosso S; De Angelis R; Ciccolallo L; Carrani E; Soerjomataram I; Grande E; Zigon G; Brenner H;
Eur J Cancer; 2009 Apr; 45(6):1080-94. PubMed ID: 19121933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Interpreting international comparisons of cancer survival: the effects of incomplete registration and the presence of death certificate only cases on survival estimates.
Robinson D; Sankila R; Hakulinen T; Møller H
Eur J Cancer; 2007 Mar; 43(5):909-13. PubMed ID: 17300929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The effect of revised populations on mortality statistics for the United States, 2000.
Anderson RN; Arias E
Natl Vital Stat Rep; 2003 Jun; 51(9):1-24. PubMed ID: 12795490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Clinical relevance of conditional survival of cancer patients in europe: age-specific analyses of 13 cancers.
Janssen-Heijnen ML; Gondos A; Bray F; Hakulinen T; Brewster DH; Brenner H; Coebergh JW
J Clin Oncol; 2010 May; 28(15):2520-8. PubMed ID: 20406936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of Cox's and relative survival models when estimating the effects of prognostic factors on disease-specific mortality: a simulation study under proportional excess hazards.
Le Teuff G; Abrahamowicz M; Bolard P; Quantin C
Stat Med; 2005 Dec; 24(24):3887-909. PubMed ID: 16320267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
