These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22000329)
1. Adjusting for the proportion of cancer deaths in the general population when using relative survival: a sensitivity analysis. Hinchliffe SR; Dickman PW; Lambert PC Cancer Epidemiol; 2012 Apr; 36(2):148-52. PubMed ID: 22000329 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Estimating expected survival probabilities for relative survival analysis--exploring the impact of including cancer patient mortality in the calculations. Talbäck M; Dickman PW Eur J Cancer; 2011 Nov; 47(17):2626-32. PubMed ID: 21924892 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Trends in the survival of patients diagnosed with cancer in the Nordic countries 1964-2003 followed up to the end of 2006. Material and methods. Engholm G; Gislum M; Bray F; Hakulinen T Acta Oncol; 2010 Jun; 49(5):545-60. PubMed ID: 20491523 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cancer survival in five continents: a worldwide population-based study (CONCORD). Coleman MP; Quaresma M; Berrino F; Lutz JM; De Angelis R; Capocaccia R; Baili P; Rachet B; Gatta G; Hakulinen T; Micheli A; Sant M; Weir HK; Elwood JM; Tsukuma H; Koifman S; E Silva GA; Francisci S; Santaquilani M; Verdecchia A; Storm HH; Young JL; Lancet Oncol; 2008 Aug; 9(8):730-56. PubMed ID: 18639491 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Trends in the overall survival of cancer patients diagnosed 1964-2003 in the Nordic countries followed up to the end of 2006: the importance of case-mix. Storm HH; Kejs AM; Engholm G; Tryggvadóttir L; Klint A; Bray F; Hakulinen T Acta Oncol; 2010 Jun; 49(5):713-24. PubMed ID: 20491527 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prophylactic Oophorectomy: Reducing the U.S. Death Rate from Epithelial Ovarian Cancer. A Continuing Debate. Piver MS Oncologist; 1996; 1(5):326-330. PubMed ID: 10388011 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Trends in survival of patients diagnosed with male genital cancers in the Nordic countries 1964-2003 followed up until the end of 2006. Bray F; Klint A; Gislum M; Hakulinen T; Engholm G; Tryggvadóttir L; Storm HH Acta Oncol; 2010 Jun; 49(5):644-54. PubMed ID: 20151937 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Reduction of population-based cancer survival estimates by trace back of death certificate notifications: an empirical illustration. Holleczek B; Brenner H Eur J Cancer; 2012 Apr; 48(6):797-804. PubMed ID: 21703847 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Choosing the relative survival method for cancer survival estimation. Hakulinen T; Seppä K; Lambert PC Eur J Cancer; 2011 Sep; 47(14):2202-10. PubMed ID: 21549589 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cancer survival in Kentucky and health insurance coverage. McDavid K; Tucker TC; Sloggett A; Coleman MP Arch Intern Med; 2003 Oct; 163(18):2135-44. PubMed ID: 14557210 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Reduction in selective under-ascertainment bias in population-based estimates of cancer patient survival by age adjustment. Brenner H; Hakulinen T Eur J Cancer; 2005 Aug; 41(12):1788-93. PubMed ID: 16043349 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cancer survival analysis in Hamburg 1995-2003: assessing the data quality within a population-based registry. Nennecke AL; Hentschel S; Reintjes R Acta Oncol; 2009; 48(1):34-43. PubMed ID: 18607873 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. How to interpret the relative survival ratios of cancer patients. Pokhrel A; Hakulinen T Eur J Cancer; 2008 Nov; 44(17):2661-7. PubMed ID: 18819791 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Trends in survival of patients diagnosed with cancers of the brain and nervous system, thyroid, eye, bone, and soft tissues in the Nordic countries 1964-2003 followed up until the end of 2006. Bray F; Engholm G; Hakulinen T; Gislum M; Tryggvadóttir L; Storm HH; Klint A Acta Oncol; 2010 Jun; 49(5):673-93. PubMed ID: 20192877 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Quantifying differences in breast cancer survival between England and Norway. Lambert PC; Holmberg L; Sandin F; Bray F; Linklater KM; Purushotham A; Robinson D; Møller H Cancer Epidemiol; 2011 Dec; 35(6):526-33. PubMed ID: 21606014 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Interpreting international comparisons of cancer survival: the effects of incomplete registration and the presence of death certificate only cases on survival estimates. Robinson D; Sankila R; Hakulinen T; Møller H Eur J Cancer; 2007 Mar; 43(5):909-13. PubMed ID: 17300929 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The effect of revised populations on mortality statistics for the United States, 2000. Anderson RN; Arias E Natl Vital Stat Rep; 2003 Jun; 51(9):1-24. PubMed ID: 12795490 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Clinical relevance of conditional survival of cancer patients in europe: age-specific analyses of 13 cancers. Janssen-Heijnen ML; Gondos A; Bray F; Hakulinen T; Brewster DH; Brenner H; Coebergh JW J Clin Oncol; 2010 May; 28(15):2520-8. PubMed ID: 20406936 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of Cox's and relative survival models when estimating the effects of prognostic factors on disease-specific mortality: a simulation study under proportional excess hazards. Le Teuff G; Abrahamowicz M; Bolard P; Quantin C Stat Med; 2005 Dec; 24(24):3887-909. PubMed ID: 16320267 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]