These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

538 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22000541)

  • 1. Determining personal talents and behavioral styles of applicants to surgical training: a new look at an old problem, part I.
    Bell RM; Fann SA; Morrison JE; Lisk JR
    J Surg Educ; 2011; 68(6):534-41. PubMed ID: 22000541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Determining personal talents and behavioral styles of applicants to surgical training: a new look at an old problem, part II.
    Bell RM; Fann SA; Morrison JE; Lisk JR
    J Surg Educ; 2012; 69(1):23-9. PubMed ID: 22208827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Predicting academic performance in surgical training.
    Yost MJ; Gardner J; Bell RM; Fann SA; Lisk JR; ; Cheadle WG; Goldman MH; Rawn S; Weigelt JA; Termuhlen PM; Woods RJ; Endean ED; Kimbrough J; Hulme M
    J Surg Educ; 2015; 72(3):491-9. PubMed ID: 25600356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The surgical residency interview: a candidate-centered, working approach.
    Seabott H; Smith RK; Alseidi A; Thirlby RC
    J Surg Educ; 2012; 69(6):802-6. PubMed ID: 23111050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Applicant Characteristics Associated With Selection for Ranking at Independent Surgery Residency Programs.
    Dort JM; Trickey AW; Kallies KJ; Joshi AR; Sidwell RA; Jarman BT
    J Surg Educ; 2015; 72(6):e123-9. PubMed ID: 26073713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Importance of the faculty interview during the resident application process.
    Brothers TE; Wetherholt S
    J Surg Educ; 2007; 64(6):378-85. PubMed ID: 18063273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Emergency medicine residency applicant views on the interview day process.
    Deiorio NM; Yarris LM; Gaines SA
    Acad Emerg Med; 2009 Dec; 16 Suppl 2():S67-70. PubMed ID: 20053215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A survey of demographics, motivations, and backgrounds among applicants to the integrated 0 + 5 vascular surgery residency.
    Lee JT; Teshome M; de Virgilio C; Ishaque B; Qiu M; Dalman RL
    J Vasc Surg; 2010 Feb; 51(2):496-502; discussion 502-3. PubMed ID: 20022205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Application submission date reflects applicant quality.
    Fuhrman GM; Dada S; Ehleben C
    J Surg Educ; 2008; 65(6):397-400. PubMed ID: 19059168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Applicants' opinions about the selection process for oral and maxillofacial surgery programs.
    Marciani RD; Smith TA; Heaton LJ
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2003 May; 61(5):608-14. PubMed ID: 12730841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. General Surgery Residency Applicant Perspectives on Alternative Residency Interview Models with Implementation of an Optional Second Look Day.
    Keshwani S; Sullivan G; Govekar H; Perez CB; Shah A; Schimpke S
    J Surg Educ; 2024 Nov; 81(11):1784-1791. PubMed ID: 39317124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Do general surgery applicants really want to be general surgeons?
    Andriole DA; Jeffe DB; Klingensmith M
    Curr Surg; 2006; 63(2):145-50. PubMed ID: 16520120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Professionalism and the match: a pediatric residency program's postinterview no-call policy and its impact on applicants.
    Opel D; Shugerman R; McPhillips H; Swanson WS; Archibald S; Diekema D
    Pediatrics; 2007 Oct; 120(4):e826-31. PubMed ID: 17768182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Google Internet searches on residency applicants do not facilitate the ranking process.
    Shin NC; Ramoska EA; Garg M; Rowh A; Nyce D; Deroos F; Carter M; Hall RV; Lopez BL;
    J Emerg Med; 2013 May; 44(5):995-8. PubMed ID: 23351574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Utilization of a Novel Program-Specific Evaluation Tool Results in a Decidedly Different Interview Pool Than Traditional Application Review.
    Lyons J; Bingmer K; Ammori J; Marks J
    J Surg Educ; 2019; 76(6):e110-e117. PubMed ID: 31668694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of two methods for ranking applicants for residency.
    Collins M; Curtis A; Artis K; Staib L; Bokhari J
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2010 Dec; 7(12):961-6. PubMed ID: 21129688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Emergency medicine residency applicant perceptions of unethical recruiting practices and illegal questioning in the match.
    Thurman RJ; Katz E; Carter W; Han J; Kayala E; McCoin N; Storrow AB
    Acad Emerg Med; 2009 Jun; 16(6):550-7. PubMed ID: 19388912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Can a structured, behavior-based interview predict future resident success?
    Strand EA; Moore E; Laube DW
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2011 May; 204(5):446.e1-446.e13. PubMed ID: 21457921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Answers to applicant selection from a directory of residency programs in obstetrics and gynecology.
    Metheny WP; Ling FW; Holzman GB; Mitchum MJ
    Obstet Gynecol; 1996 Jul; 88(1):133-6. PubMed ID: 8684746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Resident selection criteria for advanced education in prosthodontic programs: program directors' perspective.
    Yuan JC; Lee DJ; Knoernschild KL; Campbell SD; Sukotjo C
    J Prosthodont; 2010 Jun; 19(4):307-14. PubMed ID: 20210858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 27.