These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

76 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2200097)

  • 1. [Adaptation of composites to enamel: relation to the appearance of marginal staining].
    Scherman L
    Rev Odontostomatol (Paris); 1990; 19(1):21-6. PubMed ID: 2200097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of two different polishing techniques on microleakage of new composites in Class V restorations.
    Yalçin F; Korkmaz Y; Başeren M
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2006 Nov; 7(5):18-25. PubMed ID: 17091136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of finishing time and techniques on marginal sealing ability of two composite restorative materials.
    Lopes GC; Franke M; Maia HP
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Jul; 88(1):32-6. PubMed ID: 12239477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Direct posterior resin composite restorations: considerations on finishing/polishing. Clinical procedures.
    Ferreira Rde S; Lopes GC; Baratieri LN
    Quintessence Int; 2004 May; 35(5):359-66. PubMed ID: 15130074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Bonding and enamel prisms. Importance of cavity margin preparation for posterior composites].
    Nebot D; Goldberg M; Fortier JP; Aldin P
    Actual Odontostomatol (Paris); 1989 Sep; 43(167):609-18. PubMed ID: 2699701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cavity preparation factors and microleakage of Class II composite restorations filled at intraoral temperatures.
    Hilton TJ; Ferracane JL
    Am J Dent; 1999 Jun; 12(3):123-30. PubMed ID: 10649934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Immediate versus water-storage performance of Class V flowable composite restoratives.
    Irie M; Hatanaka K; Suzuki K; Watts DC
    Dent Mater; 2006 Sep; 22(9):875-83. PubMed ID: 16837038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Dental-prosthetic margin in bonded esthetic restorations. Clinical aspects].
    Magneville B; Dejou J; Simon J
    Cah Prothese; 1991 Jun; (74):26-32. PubMed ID: 1860078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cavity preparation devices: effect on microleakage of Class V resin-based composite restorations.
    Setien VJ; Cobb DS; Denehy GE; Vargas MA
    Am J Dent; 2001 Jun; 14(3):157-62. PubMed ID: 11572294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. SEM and microleakage evaluation of the marginal integrity of two types of class V restorations with or without the use of a light-curable coating material and of polishing.
    Magni E; Zhang L; Hickel R; Bossù M; Polimeni A; Ferrari M
    J Dent; 2008 Nov; 36(11):885-91. PubMed ID: 18757129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of light source position and bevel placement on facial margin adaptation of resin-based composite restorations.
    Hoelscher DC; Gregory WA; Linger JB; Pink FE
    Am J Dent; 2000 Aug; 13(4):171-5. PubMed ID: 11763925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of three surface sealants on marginal sealing of Class V composite resin restorations.
    Ramos RP; Chimello DT; Chinelatti MA; Dibb RG; Mondelli J
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(5):448-53. PubMed ID: 11203855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Microleakage of adhesive restorative materials.
    Gladys S; Van Meerbeek B; Lambrechts P; Vanherle G
    Am J Dent; 2001 Jun; 14(3):170-6. PubMed ID: 11572296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Interfacial gaps following ceramic inlay cementation vs direct composites.
    Iida K; Inokoshi S; Kurosaki N
    Oper Dent; 2003; 28(4):445-52. PubMed ID: 12877431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effect of additional enamel etching and a flowable composite to the interfacial integrity of Class II adhesive composite restorations.
    Belli S; Inokoshi S; Ozer F; Pereira PN; Ogata M; Tagami J
    Oper Dent; 2001; 26(1):70-5. PubMed ID: 11203780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Laboratory evaluation of compomers in Class V restorations.
    Chersoni S; Lorenzi R; Ferrieri P; Prati C
    Am J Dent; 1997 Jun; 10(3):147-51. PubMed ID: 9545890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Class II composite resin restorations with two polymerization techniques: relationship between microtensile bond strength and marginal leakage.
    Cenci M; Demarco F; de Carvalho R
    J Dent; 2005 Aug; 33(7):603-10. PubMed ID: 16005800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effect of internal bevel on marginal leakage at the approximal surface of Class 2 composite restorations.
    Holan G; Eidelman E; Wright GZ
    Oper Dent; 1997; 22(5):217-21. PubMed ID: 9484144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effect of a "resin coating" on the interfacial adaptation of composite inlays.
    Jayasooriya PR; Pereira PN; Nikaido T; Burrow MF; Tagami J
    Oper Dent; 2003; 28(1):28-35. PubMed ID: 12540115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Marginal adaptation and microtensile bond strength of composite indirect restorations bonded to dentin treated with adhesive and low-viscosity composite.
    de Andrade OS; de Goes MF; Montes MA
    Dent Mater; 2007 Mar; 23(3):279-87. PubMed ID: 16546249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.