These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

82 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22001042)

  • 1. Higher hazard substances under The Massachusetts Toxics Use Reduction Act: lessons from the first four years.
    Massey RI; Tenney H; Harriman E
    New Solut; 2011; 21(3):457-76. PubMed ID: 22001042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Pollution prevention and the work environment: the Massachusetts experience.
    Roelofs CR; Moure-Eraso R; Ellenbecker MJ
    Appl Occup Environ Hyg; 2000 Nov; 15(11):843-50. PubMed ID: 11062929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The drive for a safer chemicals policy in the United States.
    Belliveau ME
    New Solut; 2011; 21(3):359-86. PubMed ID: 22001036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Chemicals policy in the 2008-2009 President's Cancer Panel Report.
    Clapp R
    New Solut; 2011; 21(3):447-55. PubMed ID: 22001041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Low-hanging fruit: social values and industry discretion in toxics use reduction policy.
    Campbell R; Levenstein C
    New Solut; 2001; 11(1):23-39. PubMed ID: 17208695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Why the toxic substances control act needs an overhaul, and how to strengthen oversight of chemicals in the interim.
    Vogel SA; Roberts JA
    Health Aff (Millwood); 2011 May; 30(5):898-905. PubMed ID: 21555473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparative hierarchical decision framework on toxics use reduction effectiveness for electronic and electrical industries.
    Kang HY; Ogunseitan O; Shapiro AA; Schoenung JM
    Environ Sci Technol; 2007 Jan; 41(2):373-9. PubMed ID: 17310694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Redesigning chemicals policy: a very different approach.
    Geiser K
    New Solut; 2011; 21(3):329-44. PubMed ID: 22001034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reducing the use of carcinogens: the Massachusetts experience.
    Jacobs MM; Massey RI; Tenney H; Harriman E
    Rev Environ Health; 2014; 29(4):319-40. PubMed ID: 25423668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. About hazard and risk assessment: regulatory approaches in assessing safety in the European Union chemicals legislation.
    Gebel T; Lechtenberg-Auffarth E; Guhe C
    Reprod Toxicol; 2009 Sep; 28(2):188-95. PubMed ID: 19631154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Background of REACH in EU regulations on evaluation of chemicals.
    Foth H; Hayes A
    Hum Exp Toxicol; 2008 Jun; 27(6):443-61. PubMed ID: 18784197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Navigating public health chemicals policy in Australia: a policy maker's and practitioner's guide.
    Capon A; Smith W; Gillespie JA
    N S W Public Health Bull; 2013 Mar; 23(11-12):217-27. PubMed ID: 23490093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Chemical categories for health hazard identification: a feasibility study.
    Rosenkranz HS; Cunningham AR
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2001 Jun; 33(3):313-8. PubMed ID: 11407934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Substitution for hazardous chemicals on an international level--the approach of the European project "SUBSPORT".
    Lissner L; Romano D
    New Solut; 2011; 21(3):477-97. PubMed ID: 22001043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Moving further upstream: from toxics reduction to the precautionary principle.
    Mayer B; Brown P; Linder M
    Public Health Rep; 2002; 117(6):574-86. PubMed ID: 12576537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996 (PRWORA); interpretation of "federal public benefit"--HHS. Notice with comment period.
    Fed Regist; 1998 Aug; 63(149):41658-61. PubMed ID: 10181721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Air toxics in the U.S.: magnitude of the problem and strategy for control.
    Berry DK
    Toxicol Ind Health; 1990 Oct; 6(5):1-12. PubMed ID: 2274973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The development of the globally harmonized system (GHS) of classification and labelling of hazardous chemicals.
    Winder C; Azzi R; Wagner D
    J Hazard Mater; 2005 Oct; 125(1-3):29-44. PubMed ID: 16039045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Control of chemicals in Sweden: an example of misuse of the "precautionary principle".
    Nilsson R
    Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2004 Feb; 57(2):107-17. PubMed ID: 14759655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An analysis of the proposed REACH regulation.
    Petry T; Knowles R; Meads R
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2006 Feb; 44(1):24-32. PubMed ID: 16249048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.