BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22001371)

  • 1. Cognitive mechanisms of risky choice: is there an evaluation cost?
    Aw J; Monteiro T; Vasconcelos M; Kacelnik A
    Behav Processes; 2012 Feb; 89(2):95-103. PubMed ID: 22001371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Simultaneous and sequential choice as a function of reward delay and magnitude: normative, descriptive and process-based models tested in the European starling (Sturnus vulgaris).
    Shapiro MS; Siller S; Kacelnik A
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2008 Jan; 34(1):75-93. PubMed ID: 18248116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Choice in multi-alternative environments: a trial-by-trial implementation of the sequential choice model.
    Vasconcelos M; Monteiro T; Aw J; Kacelnik A
    Behav Processes; 2010 May; 84(1):435-9. PubMed ID: 19948210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Risk sensitivity for amounts of and delay to rewards: adaptation for uncertainty or by-product of reward rate maximising?
    Shapiro MS; Schuck-Paim C; Kacelnik A
    Behav Processes; 2012 Feb; 89(2):104-14. PubMed ID: 21925575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Context-dependent preferences in starlings: linking ecology, foraging and choice.
    Vasconcelos M; Monteiro T; Kacelnik A
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(5):e64934. PubMed ID: 23705019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sequential and simultaneous choices: testing the diet selection and sequential choice models.
    Freidin E; Aw J; Kacelnik A
    Behav Processes; 2009 Mar; 80(3):218-23. PubMed ID: 20522312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Midsession reversal task with pigeons: Parallel processing of alternatives explains choices.
    Smith AP; Zentall TR; Kacelnik A
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2018 Jul; 44(3):272-279. PubMed ID: 29985044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Optimal risky choice in humans: effects of amount of variability.
    Searcy GD; Pietras CJ
    Behav Processes; 2011 May; 87(1):88-99. PubMed ID: 21277956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Paradoxical choice in rats: Subjective valuation and mechanism of choice.
    Ojeda A; Murphy RA; Kacelnik A
    Behav Processes; 2018 Jul; 152():73-80. PubMed ID: 29608942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Starlings' preferences for predictable and unpredictable delays to food.
    Bateson M; Kacelnik A
    Anim Behav; 1997 Jun; 53(6):1129-42. PubMed ID: 9236010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Rational choice, context dependence, and the value of information in European starlings (Sturnus vulgaris).
    Freidin E; Kacelnik A
    Science; 2011 Nov; 334(6058):1000-2. PubMed ID: 22096203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Developmental history, energetic state and choice impulsivity in European starlings, Sturnus vulgaris.
    Dunn J; Andrews C; Nettle D; Bateson M
    Anim Cogn; 2019 May; 22(3):413-421. PubMed ID: 30840167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The power of nothing: Risk preference in pigeons, but not people, is driven primarily by avoidance of zero outcomes.
    Pisklak JM; Madan CR; Ludvig EA; Spetch ML
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2019 Oct; 45(4):431-445. PubMed ID: 31414880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Risky choice and Weber's Law.
    Kacelnik A; Brito e Abreu F
    J Theor Biol; 1998 Sep; 194(2):289-98. PubMed ID: 9778440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Gambling in rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta): The effect of cues signaling risky choice outcomes.
    Smith TR; Beran MJ; Young ME
    Learn Behav; 2017 Sep; 45(3):288-299. PubMed ID: 28421468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Toward a mental arithmetic process in risky choices.
    Rao LL; Liu XN; Li Q; Zhou Y; Liang ZY; Sun HY; Zhou RL; Li S
    Brain Cogn; 2013 Dec; 83(3):307-14. PubMed ID: 24128658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Decision making and risk attitude of the common marmoset in a gambling task.
    Tokuno H; Tanaka I
    Neurosci Res; 2011 Nov; 71(3):260-5. PubMed ID: 21802456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Human risky choice: delay sensitivity depends on reinforcer type.
    Locey ML; Pietras CJ; Hackenberg TD
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2009 Jan; 35(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 19159159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of monetary reserves and rate of gain on human risky choice under budget constraints.
    Pietras CJ; Searcy GD; Huitema BE; Brandt AE
    Behav Processes; 2008 Jul; 78(3):358-73. PubMed ID: 18342458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Preferences for fixed and variable food sources: variability in amount and delay.
    Bateson M; Kacelnik A
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1995 May; 63(3):313-29. PubMed ID: 7751835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.