These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22001770)

  • 1. Attention failures versus misplaced diligence: separating attention lapses from speed-accuracy trade-offs.
    Seli P; Cheyne JA; Smilek D
    Conscious Cogn; 2012 Mar; 21(1):277-91. PubMed ID: 22001770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Challenge and error: critical events and attention-related errors.
    Cheyne JA; Carriere JS; Solman GJ; Smilek D
    Cognition; 2011 Dec; 121(3):437-46. PubMed ID: 21861999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Absent-mindedness: Lapses of conscious awareness and everyday cognitive failures.
    Cheyne JA; Carriere JS; Smilek D
    Conscious Cogn; 2006 Sep; 15(3):578-92. PubMed ID: 16427318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sequence effects in the Go/NoGo task: inhibition and facilitation.
    Thomas SJ; Gonsalvez CJ; Johnstone SJ
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2009 Dec; 74(3):209-19. PubMed ID: 19751776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of pre-stimulus processing on subsequent events in a warned Go/NoGo paradigm: response preparation, execution and inhibition.
    Smith JL; Johnstone SJ; Barry RJ
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2006 Aug; 61(2):121-33. PubMed ID: 16214250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Response inhibition and interference control in children with AD/HD: a visual ERP investigation.
    Johnstone SJ; Barry RJ; Markovska V; Dimoska A; Clarke AR
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2009 May; 72(2):145-53. PubMed ID: 19095016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reduction of nocturnal slow-wave activity affects daytime vigilance lapses and memory encoding but not reaction time or implicit learning.
    Van Der Werf YD; Altena E; Vis JC; Koene T; Van Someren EJ
    Prog Brain Res; 2011; 193():245-55. PubMed ID: 21854967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Consistency of sustained attention across modalities: comparing visual and auditory versions of the SART.
    Seli P; Cheyne JA; Barton KR; Smilek D
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2012 Mar; 66(1):44-50. PubMed ID: 21910522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Measuring sustained attention after traumatic brain injury: differences in key findings from the sustained attention to response task (SART).
    Whyte J; Grieb-Neff P; Gantz C; Polansky M
    Neuropsychologia; 2006; 44(10):2007-14. PubMed ID: 16682059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Caffeine effects on ERPs and performance in an auditory Go/NoGo task.
    Barry RJ; Johnstone SJ; Clarke AR; Rushby JA; Brown CR; McKenzie DN
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Dec; 118(12):2692-9. PubMed ID: 17905651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dynamic coding of events within the inferior frontal gyrus in a probabilistic selective attention task.
    Vossel S; Weidner R; Fink GR
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 Feb; 23(2):414-24. PubMed ID: 20146598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A methodological note on evaluating performance in a sustained-attention-to-response task.
    Seli P; Jonker TR; Solman GJ; Cheyne JA; Smilek D
    Behav Res Methods; 2013 Jun; 45(2):355-63. PubMed ID: 23055171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Self-Alert Training: volitional modulation of autonomic arousal improves sustained attention.
    O'Connell RG; Bellgrove MA; Dockree PM; Lau A; Fitzgerald M; Robertson IH
    Neuropsychologia; 2008 Apr; 46(5):1379-90. PubMed ID: 18249419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Global interference and spatial uncertainty in the Sustained Attention to Response Task (SART).
    Helton WS; Weil L; Middlemiss A; Sawers A
    Conscious Cogn; 2010 Mar; 19(1):77-85. PubMed ID: 20138552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparative analysis of event-related potentials during Go/NoGo and CPT: decomposition of electrophysiological markers of response inhibition and sustained attention.
    Kirmizi-Alsan E; Bayraktaroglu Z; Gurvit H; Keskin YH; Emre M; Demiralp T
    Brain Res; 2006 Aug; 1104(1):114-28. PubMed ID: 16824492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Spatial attention does improve temporal discrimination.
    Chica AB; Christie J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Feb; 71(2):273-80. PubMed ID: 19304617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Combining speed and accuracy to control for speed-accuracy trade-offs(?).
    Liesefeld HR; Janczyk M
    Behav Res Methods; 2019 Feb; 51(1):40-60. PubMed ID: 30022459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of speed and accuracy strategy on choice step execution in response to the flanker interference task.
    Uemura K; Oya T; Uchiyama Y
    Hum Mov Sci; 2013 Dec; 32(6):1393-403. PubMed ID: 24060225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sustaining visual attention in the face of distraction: a novel gradual-onset continuous performance task.
    Rosenberg M; Noonan S; DeGutis J; Esterman M
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2013 Apr; 75(3):426-39. PubMed ID: 23299180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Two types of action error: electrophysiological evidence for separable inhibitory and sustained attention neural mechanisms producing error on go/no-go tasks.
    O'Connell RG; Dockree PM; Bellgrove MA; Turin A; Ward S; Foxe JJ; Robertson IH
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Jan; 21(1):93-104. PubMed ID: 18476764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.