BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

242 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22002115)

  • 1. Tertiary Gleason pattern 5 on needle biopsy predicts greater tumour volume on radical prostatectomy.
    Ranaweera M; Samaratunga H; Duffy D; Klopfer K; Brunelli M; Martignoni G; Delahunt B
    Pathology; 2011 Dec; 43(7):693-6. PubMed ID: 22002115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Correlation of the primary Gleason pattern on prostate needle biopsy with clinico-pathological factors in Gleason 7 tumors.
    Grober ED; Tsihlias J; Jewett MA; Sweet JM; Evans AJ; Trachtenberg J; Robinette M; Nam RK
    Can J Urol; 2004 Feb; 11(1):2157-62. PubMed ID: 15003158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The percent of cores positive for cancer in prostate needle biopsy specimens is strongly predictive of tumor stage and volume at radical prostatectomy.
    Sebo TJ; Bock BJ; Cheville JC; Lohse C; Wollan P; Zincke H
    J Urol; 2000 Jan; 163(1):174-8. PubMed ID: 10604340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Gleason score 7 prostate cancer on needle biopsy: relation of primary pattern 3 or 4 to pathological stage and progression after radical prostatectomy.
    Amin A; Partin A; Epstein JI
    J Urol; 2011 Oct; 186(4):1286-90. PubMed ID: 21862072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Increasing the number of biopsies increases the concordance of Gleason scores of needle biopsies and prostatectomy specimens.
    Divrik RT; Eroglu A; Sahin A; Zorlu F; Ozen H
    Urol Oncol; 2007; 25(5):376-82. PubMed ID: 17826653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Gleason score 7 prostate cancer on needle biopsy: is the prognostic difference in Gleason scores 4 + 3 and 3 + 4 independent of the number of involved cores?
    Makarov DV; Sanderson H; Partin AW; Epstein JI
    J Urol; 2002 Jun; 167(6):2440-2. PubMed ID: 11992053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Upgrade in Gleason score between prostate biopsies and pathology following radical prostatectomy significantly impacts upon the risk of biochemical recurrence.
    Corcoran NM; Hong MK; Casey RG; Hurtado-Coll A; Peters J; Harewood L; Goldenberg SL; Hovens CM; Costello AJ; Gleave ME
    BJU Int; 2011 Oct; 108(8 Pt 2):E202-10. PubMed ID: 21443656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A contemporary study correlating prostate needle biopsy and radical prostatectomy Gleason score.
    Fine SW; Epstein JI
    J Urol; 2008 Apr; 179(4):1335-8; discussion 1338-9. PubMed ID: 18289601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Initial atypical diagnosis with carcinoma on subsequent prostate needle biopsy: findings at radical prostatectomy.
    Chen YB; Pierorazio PM; Epstein JI
    J Urol; 2010 Nov; 184(5):1953-7. PubMed ID: 20846684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Improved risk stratification for biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy using a novel risk group system based on prostate specific antigen density and biopsy Gleason score.
    Freedland SJ; Wieder JA; Jack GS; Dorey F; deKernion JB; Aronson WJ
    J Urol; 2002 Jul; 168(1):110-5. PubMed ID: 12050502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Limitations of biopsy Gleason grade: implications for counseling patients with biopsy Gleason score 6 prostate cancer.
    Sved PD; Gomez P; Manoharan M; Kim SS; Soloway MS
    J Urol; 2004 Jul; 172(1):98-102. PubMed ID: 15201746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Usual and unusual histologic patterns of high Gleason score 8 to 10 adenocarcinoma of the prostate in needle biopsy tissue.
    Gottipati S; Warncke J; Vollmer R; Humphrey PA
    Am J Surg Pathol; 2012 Jun; 36(6):900-7. PubMed ID: 22367295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Multiple prostate cancer cores with different Gleason grades submitted in the same specimen container without specific site designation: should each core be assigned an individual Gleason score?
    Kunju LP; Daignault S; Wei JT; Shah RB
    Hum Pathol; 2009 Apr; 40(4):558-64. PubMed ID: 19144380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Significance of tertiary Gleason pattern 5 in Gleason score 7 radical prostatectomy specimens.
    Whittemore DE; Hick EJ; Carter MR; Moul JW; Miranda-Sousa AJ; Sexton WJ
    J Urol; 2008 Feb; 179(2):516-22; discussion 522. PubMed ID: 18076949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The value of mandatory second opinion pathology review of prostate needle biopsy interpretation before radical prostatectomy.
    Brimo F; Schultz L; Epstein JI
    J Urol; 2010 Jul; 184(1):126-30. PubMed ID: 20478583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Clinicopathological features of prostate cancers detected after an initial diagnosis of 'atypical glands suspicious for cancer'.
    Zhou M; Magi-Galluzzi C
    Pathology; 2010 Jun; 42(4):334-8. PubMed ID: 20438405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Does the tertiary Gleason pattern influence the PSA progression-free interval after retropubic radical prostatectomy for organ-confined prostate cancer?
    van Oort IM; Schout BM; Kiemeney LA; Hulsbergen CA; Witjes JA
    Eur Urol; 2005 Oct; 48(4):572-6. PubMed ID: 16046051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The percentage of prostate needle biopsy cores with carcinoma from the more involved side of the biopsy as a predictor of prostate specific antigen recurrence after radical prostatectomy: results from the Shared Equal Access Regional Cancer Hospital (SEARCH) database.
    Freedland SJ; Aronson WJ; Terris MK; Kane CJ; Amling CL; Dorey F; Presti JC
    Cancer; 2003 Dec; 98(11):2344-50. PubMed ID: 14635068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Gleason scores of prostate needle biopsy specimens and of radical prostatectomy specimens, a comparative study].
    Xia T; Dong J; Zhang J
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2002 Dec; 82(23):1604-5. PubMed ID: 12667365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Extended prostate biopsy scheme improves reliability of Gleason grading: implications for radiotherapy patients.
    King CR; McNeal JE; Gill H; Presti JC
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2004 Jun; 59(2):386-91. PubMed ID: 15145152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.