These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

295 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22003245)

  • 1. Normalization, testing, and false discovery rate estimation for RNA-sequencing data.
    Li J; Witten DM; Johnstone IM; Tibshirani R
    Biostatistics; 2012 Jul; 13(3):523-38. PubMed ID: 22003245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Finding consistent patterns: a nonparametric approach for identifying differential expression in RNA-Seq data.
    Li J; Tibshirani R
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2013 Oct; 22(5):519-36. PubMed ID: 22127579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Accuracy of RNA-Seq and its dependence on sequencing depth.
    Cai G; Li H; Lu Y; Huang X; Lee J; Müller P; Ji Y; Liang S
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2012; 13 Suppl 13(Suppl 13):S5. PubMed ID: 23320920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Is this the right normalization? A diagnostic tool for ChIP-seq normalization.
    Angelini C; Heller R; Volkinshtein R; Yekutieli D
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2015 May; 16():150. PubMed ID: 25957089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sample size calculation while controlling false discovery rate for differential expression analysis with RNA-sequencing experiments.
    Bi R; Liu P
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2016 Mar; 17():146. PubMed ID: 27029470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. cn.MOPS: mixture of Poissons for discovering copy number variations in next-generation sequencing data with a low false discovery rate.
    Klambauer G; Schwarzbauer K; Mayr A; Clevert DA; Mitterecker A; Bodenhofer U; Hochreiter S
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2012 May; 40(9):e69. PubMed ID: 22302147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Statistical tools for transgene copy number estimation based on real-time PCR.
    Yuan JS; Burris J; Stewart NR; Mentewab A; Stewart CN
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2007 Nov; 8 Suppl 7(Suppl 7):S6. PubMed ID: 18047729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparing the normalization methods for the differential analysis of Illumina high-throughput RNA-Seq data.
    Li P; Piao Y; Shon HS; Ryu KH
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2015 Oct; 16():347. PubMed ID: 26511205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Empirical estimation of sequencing error rates using smoothing splines.
    Zhu X; Wang J; Peng B; Shete S
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2016 Apr; 17():177. PubMed ID: 27102907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. False discovery rates: a new deal.
    Stephens M
    Biostatistics; 2017 Apr; 18(2):275-294. PubMed ID: 27756721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Rank-invariant resampling based estimation of false discovery rate for analysis of small sample microarray data.
    Jain N; Cho H; O'Connell M; Lee JK
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2005 Jul; 6():187. PubMed ID: 16042779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A classification approach for DNA methylation profiling with bisulfite next-generation sequencing data.
    Cheng L; Zhu Y
    Bioinformatics; 2014 Jan; 30(2):172-9. PubMed ID: 24273245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A statistical method for the detection of variants from next-generation resequencing of DNA pools.
    Bansal V
    Bioinformatics; 2010 Jun; 26(12):i318-24. PubMed ID: 20529923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An optimal test with maximum average power while controlling FDR with application to RNA-seq data.
    Si Y; Liu P
    Biometrics; 2013 Sep; 69(3):594-605. PubMed ID: 23889143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. False discovery rate estimation for large-scale homogeneous discrete p-values.
    Liang K
    Biometrics; 2016 Jun; 72(2):639-48. PubMed ID: 26492596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Joint estimation of isoform expression and isoform-specific read distribution using multisample RNA-Seq data.
    Suo C; Calza S; Salim A; Pawitan Y
    Bioinformatics; 2014 Feb; 30(4):506-13. PubMed ID: 24307704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An associative analysis of gene expression array data.
    Dozmorov I; Centola M
    Bioinformatics; 2003 Jan; 19(2):204-11. PubMed ID: 12538240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Single read and paired end mRNA-Seq Illumina libraries from 10 nanograms total RNA.
    Sengupta S; Bolin JM; Ruotti V; Nguyen BK; Thomson JA; Elwell AL; Stewart R
    J Vis Exp; 2011 Oct; (56):e3340. PubMed ID: 22064688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. ConReg-R: Extrapolative recalibration of the empirical distribution of p-values to improve false discovery rate estimates.
    Li J; Paramita P; Choi KP; Karuturi RK
    Biol Direct; 2011 May; 6():27. PubMed ID: 21595983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of normalization and differential expression analyses using RNA-Seq data from 726 individual Drosophila melanogaster.
    Lin Y; Golovnina K; Chen ZX; Lee HN; Negron YL; Sultana H; Oliver B; Harbison ST
    BMC Genomics; 2016 Jan; 17():28. PubMed ID: 26732976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.