128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22003837)
1. Economic decision biases and fundamental motivations: how mating and self-protection alter loss aversion.
Li YJ; Kenrick DT; Griskevicius V; Neuberg SL
J Pers Soc Psychol; 2012 Mar; 102(3):550-61. PubMed ID: 22003837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. When gains loom larger than losses: reversed loss aversion for small amounts of money.
Harinck F; Van Dijk E; Van Beest I; Mersmann P
Psychol Sci; 2007 Dec; 18(12):1099-105. PubMed ID: 18031418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Blatant benevolence and conspicuous consumption: when romantic motives elicit strategic costly signals.
Griskevicius V; Tybur JM; Sundie JM; Cialdini RB; Miller GF; Kenrick DT
J Pers Soc Psychol; 2007 Jul; 93(1):85-102. PubMed ID: 17605591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Risk-taking in adolescence: A neuroeconomics approach].
Barbalat G; Domenech P; Vernet M; Fourneret P
Encephale; 2010 Apr; 36(2):147-54. PubMed ID: 20434632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. My loss is your loss ... Sometimes: loss aversion and the effect of motivational biases.
Wilson RS; Arvai JL; Arkes HR
Risk Anal; 2008 Aug; 28(4):929-38. PubMed ID: 18564994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Going along versus going alone: when fundamental motives facilitate strategic (non)conformity.
Griskevicius V; Goldstein NJ; Mortensen CR; Cialdini RB; Kenrick DT
J Pers Soc Psychol; 2006 Aug; 91(2):281-94. PubMed ID: 16881765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparing gains and losses.
McGraw AP; Larsen JT; Kahneman D; Schkade D
Psychol Sci; 2010 Oct; 21(10):1438-45. PubMed ID: 20739673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Stereotype threat affects financial decision making.
Carr PB; Steele CM
Psychol Sci; 2010 Oct; 21(10):1411-6. PubMed ID: 20855899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Promoting de-escalation of commitment: a regulatory-focus perspective on sunk costs.
Molden DC; Hui CM
Psychol Sci; 2011 Jan; 22(1):8-12. PubMed ID: 21106888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Play it safe or go for the gold? A terror management perspective on self-enhancement and self-protective motives in risky decision making.
Landau MJ; Greenberg J
Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2006 Dec; 32(12):1633-45. PubMed ID: 17122176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The foreign-language effect: thinking in a foreign tongue reduces decision biases.
Keysar B; Hayakawa SL; An SG
Psychol Sci; 2012 Jun; 23(6):661-8. PubMed ID: 22517192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. On the association between adolescent autonomy and psychosocial functioning: examining decisional independence from a self-determination theory perspective.
Van Petegem S; Beyers W; Vansteenkiste M; Soenens B
Dev Psychol; 2012 Jan; 48(1):76-88. PubMed ID: 21910525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Suicide triggers as sex-specific threats in domains of evolutionary import: negative correlation between global male-to-female suicide ratios and average per capita gross national income.
Saad G
Med Hypotheses; 2007; 68(3):692-6. PubMed ID: 17011714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Conjugal unions and reproductive strategies in Brazil].
Berquo E; Loyola MA
Rev Bras Estud Popul; 1984; 1(1-2):35-98. PubMed ID: 12280271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. How to make loss aversion disappear and reverse: tests of the decision by sampling origin of loss aversion.
Walasek L; Stewart N
J Exp Psychol Gen; 2015 Feb; 144(1):7-11. PubMed ID: 25485606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Reproductive motivation and family-size preferences among Nigerian men.
Isiugo-Abanihe UC
Stud Fam Plann; 1994; 25(3):149-61. PubMed ID: 7940620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Explaining financial and prosocial biases in favor of attractive people: Interdisciplinary perspectives from economics, social psychology, and evolutionary psychology.
Maestripieri D; Henry A; Nickels N
Behav Brain Sci; 2017 Jan; 40():e19. PubMed ID: 27283466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Distinct neuropsychological processes may mediate decision-making under uncertainty with known and unknown probability in gain and loss frames.
Inukai K; Takahashi T
Med Hypotheses; 2006; 67(2):283-6. PubMed ID: 16574332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Aggress to impress: hostility as an evolved context-dependent strategy.
Griskevicius V; Tybur JM; Gangestad SW; Perea EF; Shapiro JR; Kenrick DT
J Pers Soc Psychol; 2009 May; 96(5):980-94. PubMed ID: 19379031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The neural basis of loss aversion in decision-making under risk.
Tom SM; Fox CR; Trepel C; Poldrack RA
Science; 2007 Jan; 315(5811):515-8. PubMed ID: 17255512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
