126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22003966)
21. Comparing learned predictiveness effects within and across compound discriminations.
Livesey EJ; Thorwart A; De Fina NL; Harris JA
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2011 Oct; 37(4):446-65. PubMed ID: 21517197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Taste preconditioning augments odor-aversion learning.
Batsell WR; Paschall GY; Gleason DI; Batson JD
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2001 Jan; 27(1):30-47. PubMed ID: 11199513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The role of congruency in retronasal odor referral to the mouth.
Lim J; Johnson MB
Chem Senses; 2012 Jul; 37(6):515-22. PubMed ID: 22302155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Enhancement of retronasal odors by taste.
Green BG; Nachtigal D; Hammond S; Lim J
Chem Senses; 2012 Jan; 37(1):77-86. PubMed ID: 21798851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Effects of excitotoxic brain lesions on taste-mediated odor learning in the rat.
Sakai N; Yamamoto T
Neurobiol Learn Mem; 2001 Mar; 75(2):128-39. PubMed ID: 11222055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Improved smell pleasantness after odor-taste associative learning in humans.
Barkat S; Poncelet J; Landis BN; Rouby C; Bensafi M
Neurosci Lett; 2008 Mar; 434(1):108-12. PubMed ID: 18280654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Odor-reward learning and enrichment have similar effects on odor perception.
Escanilla O; Mandairon N; Linster C
Physiol Behav; 2008 Jul; 94(4):621-6. PubMed ID: 18455204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Higher-order conditioning of taste-odor learning in rats: Evidence for the association between emotional aspects of gustatory information and olfactory information.
Onuma T; Sakai N
Physiol Behav; 2016 Oct; 164(Pt A):407-16. PubMed ID: 27342429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Aversive learning increases sensory detection sensitivity.
Åhs F; Miller SS; Gordon AR; Lundström JN
Biol Psychol; 2013 Feb; 92(2):135-41. PubMed ID: 23174695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. When patterning discriminations are harder than biconditional ones: A cue constellation approach.
Whitlow JW; Loatman PA
J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2015 Oct; 41(4):354-70. PubMed ID: 26147603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Sensory characteristics and consumer acceptability of beef stock containing the glutathione-xylose Maillard reaction product and/or monosodium glutamate.
Hong JH; Kwon KY; Kim KO
J Food Sci; 2012 Jun; 77(6):S233-9. PubMed ID: 22591448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Summation effects in human learning: evidence from patterning discriminations in goal-tracking.
Thorwart A; Uengoer M; Livesey EJ; Harris JA
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Jul; 70(7):1366-1379. PubMed ID: 27126385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Maintaining accuracy at the expense of speed: stimulus similarity defines odor discrimination time in mice.
Abraham NM; Spors H; Carleton A; Margrie TW; Kuner T; Schaefer AT
Neuron; 2004 Dec; 44(5):865-76. PubMed ID: 15572116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Convergent results in eyeblink conditioning and contingency learning in humans: addition of a common cue does not affect feature-negative discriminations.
Thorwart A; Glautier S; Lachnit H
Biol Psychol; 2010 Oct; 85(2):207-12. PubMed ID: 20638441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Smelling the goodness: Sniffing as a behavioral measure of learned odor hedonics.
Yeomans MR; Prescott J
J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2016 Oct; 42(4):391-400. PubMed ID: 27732049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Sweet odours and sweet tastes are conflated in memory.
Stevenson RJ; Oaten MJ
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 May; 134(1):105-9. PubMed ID: 20097323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. An olfactory biconditional discrimination in the mouse.
Dreumont-Boudreau SE; Dingle RN; Alcolado GM; LoLordo VM
Physiol Behav; 2006 Mar; 87(3):634-40. PubMed ID: 16483617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Response accuracy and odor sampling time in mice trained to discriminate between enantiomers of carvone and those of terpinen-4-ol.
Slotnick B
Chem Senses; 2007 Sep; 32(7):721-5. PubMed ID: 17567630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Cue competition influences biconditional discrimination.
Byrom NC; Murphy RA
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Feb; 72(2):182-192. PubMed ID: 28764580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Perceptual processing strategy and exposure influence the perception of odor mixtures.
Le Berre E; Thomas-Danguin T; Béno N; Coureaud G; Etiévant P; Prescott J
Chem Senses; 2008 Feb; 33(2):193-9. PubMed ID: 18071197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
