These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
70 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22003967)
1. Analysis of us-preexposure effects in appetitive conditioning. Franklin S; Hall G J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2011 Oct; 37(4):495-500. PubMed ID: 22003967 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Analysis of the learned irrelevance effect in appetitive pavlovian conditioning. Bonardi C; Hall G; Ong SY Q J Exp Psychol B; 2005 Apr; 58(2):141-62. PubMed ID: 16095043 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Appetitive latent inhibition in rats: preexposure performance does not predict conditioned performance. Boughner RL; Papini MR Behav Processes; 2006 Mar; 72(1):42-51. PubMed ID: 16406375 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The US-preexposure effect in lithium-induced flavor-aversion conditioning is a consequence of blocking by injection cues. de Brugada I; Hall G; Symonds M J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2004 Jan; 30(1):58-66. PubMed ID: 14709115 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of changing the unconditioned stimulus on appetitive blocking. Ganesan R; Pearce JM J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1988 Jul; 14(3):280-91. PubMed ID: 3404082 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. US-preexposure effects in flavor-preference and flavor-aversion learning with nonnutritive USs. Gil M; Recio SA; de Brugada I; Symonds M; Hall G Behav Processes; 2014 Jul; 106():67-73. PubMed ID: 24811451 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Electrolytic lesions to nucleus accumbens core and shell have dissociable effects on conditioning to discrete and contextual cues in aversive and appetitive procedures respectively. Cassaday HJ; Horsley RR; Norman C Behav Brain Res; 2005 May; 160(2):222-35. PubMed ID: 15863219 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effects of contextual conditioning and unconditional stimulus presentation on performance in appetitive conditioning. Bouton ME; Rosengard C; Achenbach GG; Peck CA; Brooks DC Q J Exp Psychol B; 1993 Feb; 46(1):63-95. PubMed ID: 8456178 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Flavour aversion produced by running and attenuated by prior exposure to wheels. Baysari M; Boakes R Q J Exp Psychol B; 2004 Jul; 57(3):273-86. PubMed ID: 15204111 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Influence of massed and distributed context preexposure on contextual fear and Egr-1 expression in the basolateral amygdala. Perez-Villalba A; Mackintosh NJ; Canales JJ Physiol Behav; 2008 Jan; 93(1-2):206-14. PubMed ID: 17900634 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparator mechanisms and conditioned inhibition: conditioned stimulus preexposure disrupts Pavlovian conditioned inhibition but not explicitly unpaired inhibition. Friedman BX; Blaisdell AP; Escobar M; Miller RR J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1998 Oct; 24(4):453-66. PubMed ID: 9805791 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Excitatory backward conditioning in an appetitive conditioned reinforcement preparation with rats. Urushihara K Behav Processes; 2004 Nov; 67(3):477-89. PubMed ID: 15518997 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Nicotine-conditioned locomotor sensitization in rats: assessment of the US-preexposure effect. Bevins RA; Palmatier MI Behav Brain Res; 2003 Jul; 143(1):65-74. PubMed ID: 12842297 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The role of habituation of the response to LiCl in the US-preexposure effect. de Brugada I; González F; Gil M; Hall G Learn Behav; 2005 Aug; 33(3):363-70. PubMed ID: 16396082 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Latent inhibition of US signal value. Goddard MJ Q J Exp Psychol B; 2003 May; 56(2):177-92. PubMed ID: 12791572 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Ventral tegmental area lesions do not enhance appetitive classically conditioned responses in the rat. Wilson WJ; Tannehill VL Acta Neurobiol Exp (Wars); 1987; 47(4):173-7. PubMed ID: 3442270 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Haloperidol can increase responding to both discrete and contextual cues in trace conditioned rats. Cassaday HJ; Nelson AJ; Norman C Behav Brain Res; 2005 Mar; 158(1):31-42. PubMed ID: 15680192 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Neurotoxic hippocampal lesions fail to impair reinstatement of an appetitively conditioned response. Fox GD; Holland PC Behav Neurosci; 1998 Feb; 112(1):255-60. PubMed ID: 9517833 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]