These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
5. Listening Effort by Native and Nonnative Listeners Due to Noise, Reverberation, and Talker Foreign Accent During English Speech Perception. Peng ZE; Wang LM J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2019 Apr; 62(4):1068-1081. PubMed ID: 30986135 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Transfer of statistical learning from passive speech perception to speech production. Murphy TK; Nozari N; Holt LL Psychon Bull Rev; 2024 Jun; 31(3):1193-1205. PubMed ID: 37884779 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Nevertheless, it persists: Dimension-based statistical learning and normalization of speech impact different levels of perceptual processing. Lehet M; Holt LL Cognition; 2020 Sep; 202():104328. PubMed ID: 32502867 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The Learning Signal in Perceptual Tuning of Speech: Bottom Up Versus Top-Down Information. Zhang X; Wu YC; Holt LL Cogn Sci; 2021 Mar; 45(3):e12947. PubMed ID: 33682208 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Listener sensitivity to individual talker differences in voice-onset-time. Allen JS; Miller JL J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Jun; 115(6):3171-83. PubMed ID: 15237841 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Distributional learning for speech reflects cumulative exposure to a talker's phonetic distributions. Theodore RM; Monto NR Psychon Bull Rev; 2019 Jun; 26(3):985-992. PubMed ID: 30604404 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Generalization of Perceptual Learning of Degraded Speech Across Talkers. Huyck JJ; Smith RH; Hawkins S; Johnsrude IS J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2017 Nov; 60(11):3334-3341. PubMed ID: 28979990 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Making predictable unpredictable with style - Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence for the critical role of prosodic expectations in the perception of prominence in speech. Kakouros S; Salminen N; Räsänen O Neuropsychologia; 2018 Jan; 109():181-199. PubMed ID: 29247667 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cue-specific effects of categorization training on the relative weighting of acoustic cues to consonant voicing in English. Francis AL; Kaganovich N; Driscoll-Huber C J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Aug; 124(2):1234-51. PubMed ID: 18681610 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Second-language experience and speech-in-noise recognition: effects of talker-listener accent similarity. Pinet M; Iverson P; Huckvale M J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Sep; 130(3):1653-62. PubMed ID: 21895102 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Attentional Modulation and Individual Differences in Explaining the Changing Role of Fundamental Frequency in Korean Laryngeal Stop Perception. Kong EJ; Lee H Lang Speech; 2018 Sep; 61(3):384-408. PubMed ID: 28937301 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Influence of fundamental frequency on stop-consonant voicing perception: a case of learned covariation or auditory enhancement? Holt LL; Lotto AJ; Kluender KR J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Feb; 109(2):764-74. PubMed ID: 11248980 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]