BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

299 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22004195)

  • 1. Different attentional blink tasks reflect distinct information processing limitations: an individual differences approach.
    Kelly AJ; Dux PE
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Dec; 37(6):1867-73. PubMed ID: 22004195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Resting EEG in alpha and beta bands predicts individual differences in attentional blink magnitude.
    MacLean MH; Arnell KM; Cote KA
    Brain Cogn; 2012 Apr; 78(3):218-29. PubMed ID: 22281183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. On the fate of distractor stimuli in rapid serial visual presentation.
    Dux PE; Coltheart V; Harris IM
    Cognition; 2006 Apr; 99(3):355-82. PubMed ID: 15993401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Greater attentional blink magnitude is associated with higher levels of anticipatory attention as measured by alpha event-related desynchronization (ERD).
    Maclean MH; Arnell KM
    Brain Res; 2011 Apr; 1387():99-107. PubMed ID: 21362413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The influence of pretarget distracter stream properties on the skeletal attentional blink.
    Janson J; Thorne JD; Kranczioch C
    Neuroreport; 2014 Mar; 25(5):330-4. PubMed ID: 24300308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Perception of temporal order is impaired during the time course of the attentional blink.
    Spalek TM; Lagroix HE; Yanko MR; Di Lollo V
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Apr; 38(2):402-13. PubMed ID: 21928925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. No commonality between attentional capture and attentional blink.
    Kawahara JI; Kihara K
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 May; 64(5):991-1008. PubMed ID: 21113860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The "beam of darkness": spreading of the attentional blink within and between objects.
    Conci M; Müller HJ
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Nov; 71(8):1725-38. PubMed ID: 19933558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Distractor devaluation effect in the attentional blink: direct evidence for distractor inhibition.
    Kihara K; Yagi Y; Takeda Y; Kawahara JI
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Feb; 37(1):168-79. PubMed ID: 20731524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Differential contributions of the intraparietal sulcus and the inferior parietal lobe to attentional blink: evidence from transcranial magnetic stimulation.
    Kihara K; Ikeda T; Matsuyoshi D; Hirose N; Mima T; Fukuyama H; Osaka N
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 Jan; 23(1):247-56. PubMed ID: 20044899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Individual differences within and across attentional blink tasks revisited.
    Dale G; Dux PE; Arnell KM
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2013 Apr; 75(3):456-67. PubMed ID: 23319149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The attentional blink within and across the hemispheres: Evidence from a patient with a complete section of the corpus callosum.
    Ptito A; Brisson B; Dell'Acqua R; Lassonde M; Jolicoeur P
    Biol Psychol; 2009 Sep; 82(1):64-9. PubMed ID: 19539687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The sparing is far from spurious: reevaluating within-trial contingency effects in the attentional blink.
    Olivers CN; Hulleman J; Spalek T; Kawahara J; Di Lollo V
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Apr; 37(2):396-408. PubMed ID: 20822301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Previous attentional set can induce an attentional blink with task-irrelevant initial targets.
    Thompson C; Underwood G; Crundall D
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2007 Dec; 60(12):1603-9. PubMed ID: 17853197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Global and local attention in the attentional blink.
    Crewther DP; Lawson ML; Crewther SG
    J Vis; 2007 Dec; 7(14):9.1-12. PubMed ID: 18217804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The attentional blink is susceptible to concurrent perceptual processing demands.
    Christmann C; Leuthold H
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2004 Feb; 57(2):357-77. PubMed ID: 14742180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Temporal constraints on conscious vision: on the ubiquitous nature of the attentional blink.
    Nieuwenstein M; Van der Burg E; Theeuwes J; Wyble B; Potter M
    J Vis; 2009 Aug; 9(9):18.1-14. PubMed ID: 19761351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evidence for distinct attentional bottlenecks in attention switching and attentional blink tasks.
    Peterson MS; Juola JF
    J Gen Psychol; 2000 Jan; 127(1):6-26. PubMed ID: 10695949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Attentional blink in patients with multiple sclerosis.
    Kavcic V; Scheid E
    Neuropsychologia; 2011 Feb; 49(3):454-60. PubMed ID: 21145330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. When do additional distractors reduce the attentional blink?
    Kawahara J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Aug; 35(4):1043-61. PubMed ID: 19653748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.