145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22004197)
1. Determining the capacity of time-based selection.
Watson DG; Kunar MA
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Apr; 38(2):350-66. PubMed ID: 22004197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Visual marking and change blindness: moving occluders and transient masks neutralize shape changes to ignored objects.
Watson DG; Kunar MA
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Dec; 36(6):1391-405. PubMed ID: 20853998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Visual marking: the influence of temporary changes on time-based visual selection.
Watson DG; Compton S; Bailey H
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Dec; 37(6):1729-38. PubMed ID: 21517208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Blink and you won't miss it: the preview benefit in visual marking survives internally generated eyeblinks.
von Mühlenen A; Watson D; Gunnell DO
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Oct; 39(5):1279-90. PubMed ID: 23398259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Flexible feature-based inhibition in visual search mediates magnified impairments of selection: evidence from carry-over effects under dynamic preview-search conditions.
Andrews LS; Watson DG; Humphreys GW; Braithwaite JJ
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Aug; 37(4):1007-16. PubMed ID: 21553995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The influence of action on visual search: behavioral response toward stimuli modifies the selection process.
Buttaccio DR; Hahn S
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Jul; 73(5):1453-66. PubMed ID: 21491163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Measuring the interrelations among multiple paradigms of visual attention: an individual differences approach.
Huang L; Mo L; Li Y
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Apr; 38(2):414-28. PubMed ID: 22250865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Visual marking: prioritizing selection for new objects by top-down attentional inhibition of old objects.
Watson DG; Humphreys GW
Psychol Rev; 1997 Jan; 104(1):90-122. PubMed ID: 9009881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Visual marking and facial affect: can an emotional face be ignored?
Blagrove E; Watson DG
Emotion; 2010 Apr; 10(2):147-68. PubMed ID: 20364892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Negative attentional set in the attentional blink: control is not lost.
Zhang D; Zhou X; Martens S
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Nov; 73(8):2489-501. PubMed ID: 21901571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The role of relational information in contingent capture.
Becker SI; Folk CL; Remington RW
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Dec; 36(6):1460-76. PubMed ID: 20919781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cognitive load modulates attentional capture by color singletons during effortful visual search.
Burnham BR
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 Sep; 135(1):50-8. PubMed ID: 20510910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A feature-weighting account of priming in conjunction search.
Becker SI; Horstmann G
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Feb; 71(2):258-72. PubMed ID: 19304616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Distinguishing different strategies of across-dimension attentional selection.
Huang L; Pashler H
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Apr; 38(2):453-64. PubMed ID: 22201466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Involuntary transfer of a top-down attentional set into the focus of attention: evidence from a contingent attentional capture paradigm.
Moore KS; Weissman DH
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Aug; 72(6):1495-509. PubMed ID: 20675796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The remains of the trial: goal-determined inter-trial suppression of selective attention.
Lleras A; Levinthal BR; Kawahara J
Prog Brain Res; 2009; 176():195-213. PubMed ID: 19733758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Recently inhibited responses are avoided for both masked and nonmasked primes in a spatial negative priming task.
Fitzgeorge L; Buckolz E; Khan M
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Jul; 73(5):1435-52. PubMed ID: 21479723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Inhibition in time-based visual selection: Strategic or by default?
Zupan Z; Watson DG; Blagrove E
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2015 Oct; 41(5):1442-61. PubMed ID: 26168141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Selection of new objects by onset capture and visual marking.
Osugi T; Hayashi D; Murakami I
Vision Res; 2016 May; 122():21-33. PubMed ID: 27001341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Object-based control of attention is sensitive to recent experience.
Lee H; Mozer MC; Kramer AF; Vecera SP
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Apr; 38(2):314-25. PubMed ID: 21967274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
