BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22004269)

  • 1. The effect of study time distribution on learning and retention: a Goldilocks principle for presentation rate.
    de Jonge M; Tabbers HK; Pecher D; Zeelenberg R
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 Mar; 38(2):405-12. PubMed ID: 22004269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of presentation rate on foreign-language vocabulary learning.
    Zeelenberg R; de Jonge M; Tabbers HK; Pecher D
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2015; 68(6):1101-15. PubMed ID: 25397973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The interplay between value and relatedness as bases for metacognitive monitoring and control: evidence for agenda-based monitoring.
    Soderstrom NC; McCabe DP
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Sep; 37(5):1236-42. PubMed ID: 21574750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Semantic information activated during retrieval contributes to later retention: Support for the mediator effectiveness hypothesis of the testing effect.
    Carpenter SK
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Nov; 37(6):1547-52. PubMed ID: 21707217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. When does testing enhance retention? A distribution-based interpretation of retrieval as a memory modifier.
    Halamish V; Bjork RA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Jul; 37(4):801-12. PubMed ID: 21480751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Spaced retrieval: absolute spacing enhances learning regardless of relative spacing.
    Karpicke JD; Bauernschmidt A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Sep; 37(5):1250-7. PubMed ID: 21574747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Examining the relationship between free recall and immediate serial recall: the effect of concurrent task performance.
    Bhatarah P; Ward G; Tan L
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Mar; 32(2):215-29. PubMed ID: 16569142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Support for an auto-associative model of spoken cued recall: evidence from fMRI.
    de Zubicaray G; McMahon K; Eastburn M; Pringle AJ; Lorenz L; Humphreys MS
    Neuropsychologia; 2007 Mar; 45(4):824-35. PubMed ID: 16989874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Directed forgetting in older adults using the item and list methods.
    Sego SA; Golding JM; Gottlob LR
    Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn; 2006 Mar; 13(1):95-114. PubMed ID: 16766345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Interference and the representation of order within associations.
    Rehani M; Caplan JB
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Jul; 64(7):1409-29. PubMed ID: 21598202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Retrieval opportunities while multitasking improve name recall.
    Helder E; Shaughnessy JJ
    Memory; 2008 Nov; 16(8):896-909. PubMed ID: 18821268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The fate of being forgotten: information that is initially forgotten is judged as less important.
    Castel AD; Rhodes MG; McCabe DP; Soderstrom NC; Loaiza VM
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(12):2281-7. PubMed ID: 23163866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Age of acquisition's effect on memory for semantically associated word pairs.
    Gullick MM; Juhasz BJ
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2008 Aug; 61(8):1177-85. PubMed ID: 18609409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Inhibitory deficits in older adults: list-method directed forgetting revisited.
    Zellner M; Bäuml KH
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Mar; 32(2):290-300. PubMed ID: 16569147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of simple- and complex-place contexts in the multiple-context paradigm.
    Isarida T; Isarida TK
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Dec; 63(12):2399-412. PubMed ID: 20446185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dissociating word stem completion and cued recall as a function of divided attention at retrieval.
    Clarke AJ; Butler LT
    Memory; 2008 Oct; 16(7):763-72. PubMed ID: 18720222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Influence of multiple-day temporal distribution of repetitions on memory: a comparison of uniform, expanding, and contracting schedules.
    Gerbier E; Koenig O
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(3):514-25. PubMed ID: 21895560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The role of frontopolar cortex in subgoal processing during working memory.
    Braver TS; Bongiolatti SR
    Neuroimage; 2002 Mar; 15(3):523-36. PubMed ID: 11848695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The longer we have to forget the more we remember: The ironic effect of postcue duration in item-based directed forgetting.
    Bancroft TD; Hockley WE; Farquhar R
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 May; 39(3):691-9. PubMed ID: 22845067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Bizarre imagery in paired-associate learning: an effective mnemonic aid with mixed context, delayed testing, and self-paced conditions.
    Iaccino JF; Sowa SJ
    Percept Mot Skills; 1989 Feb; 68(1):307-16. PubMed ID: 2928063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.