These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22004277)

  • 1. Atom probe trajectory mapping using experimental tip shape measurements.
    Haley D; Petersen T; Ringer SP; Smith GD
    J Microsc; 2011 Nov; 244(2):170-80. PubMed ID: 22004277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Level set methods for modelling field evaporation in atom probe.
    Haley D; Moody MP; Smith GD
    Microsc Microanal; 2013 Dec; 19(6):1709-17. PubMed ID: 23985174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. On the use of simulated field-evaporated specimen apex shapes in atom probe tomography data reconstruction.
    Larson DJ; Geiser BP; Prosa TJ; Kelly TF
    Microsc Microanal; 2012 Oct; 18(5):953-63. PubMed ID: 23058657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Macroscopic electrical field distribution and field-induced surface stresses of needle-shaped field emitters.
    Moy C; Ranzi G; Petersen TC; Ringer S
    Ultramicroscopy; 2011 May; 111(6):397-404. PubMed ID: 21664539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Improvements in planar feature reconstructions in atom probe tomography.
    Larson DJ; Geiser BP; Prosa TJ; Gerstl SS; Reinhard DA; Kelly TF
    J Microsc; 2011 Jul; 243(1):15-30. PubMed ID: 21155994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Towards better 3-D reconstructions by combining electron tomography and atom-probe tomography.
    Arslan I; Marquis EA; Homer M; Hekmaty MA; Bartelt NC
    Ultramicroscopy; 2008 Nov; 108(12):1579-85. PubMed ID: 18620812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evolution of tip shape during field evaporation of complex multilayer structures.
    Marquis EA; Geiser BP; Prosa TJ; Larson DJ
    J Microsc; 2011 Mar; 241(3):225-33. PubMed ID: 21118216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Pragmatic reconstruction methods in atom probe tomography.
    Vurpillot F; Gruber M; Da Costa G; Martin I; Renaud L; Bostel A
    Ultramicroscopy; 2011 Jul; 111(8):1286-94. PubMed ID: 21864769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Impact of laser pulsing on the reconstruction in an atom probe tomography.
    Gault B; La Fontaine A; Moody MP; Ringer SP; Marquis EA
    Ultramicroscopy; 2010 Aug; 110(9):1215-22. PubMed ID: 20471173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Characteristics of cross-sectional atom probe analysis on semiconductor structures.
    Koelling S; Innocenti N; Hellings G; Gilbert M; Kambham AK; De Meyer K; Vandervorst W
    Ultramicroscopy; 2011 May; 111(6):540-5. PubMed ID: 21292399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Revealing the 3-dimensional shape of atom probe tips by atomic force microscopy.
    Fleischmann C; Paredis K; Melkonyan D; Vandervorst W
    Ultramicroscopy; 2018 Nov; 194():221-226. PubMed ID: 30216823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. HAADF-STEM atom counting in atom probe tomography specimens: Towards quantitative correlative microscopy.
    Lefebvre W; Hernandez-Maldonado D; Moyon F; Cuvilly F; Vaudolon C; Shinde D; Vurpillot F
    Ultramicroscopy; 2015 Dec; 159 Pt 2():403-12. PubMed ID: 25747283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Investigations of field-evaporated end forms in voltage- and laser-pulsed atom probe tomography.
    Shariq A; Mutas S; Wedderhoff K; Klein C; Hortenbach H; Teichert S; Kücher P; Gerstl SS
    Ultramicroscopy; 2009 Apr; 109(5):472-9. PubMed ID: 19062187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. 3D analysis of advanced nano-devices using electron and atom probe tomography.
    Grenier A; Duguay S; Barnes JP; Serra R; Haberfehlner G; Cooper D; Bertin F; Barraud S; Audoit G; Arnoldi L; Cadel E; Chabli A; Vurpillot F
    Ultramicroscopy; 2014 Jan; 136():185-92. PubMed ID: 24189616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Three-dimensional atom probe tomography of oxide, anion, and alkanethiolate coatings on gold.
    Zhang Y; Hillier AC
    Anal Chem; 2010 Jul; 82(14):6139-47. PubMed ID: 20575560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reflections on the Projection of Ions in Atom Probe Tomography.
    De Geuser F; Gault B
    Microsc Microanal; 2017 Apr; 23(2):238-246. PubMed ID: 28148309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Standard deviations of composition measurements in atom probe analyses. Part I conventional 1D atom probe.
    Danoix F; Grancher G; Bostel A; Blavette D
    Ultramicroscopy; 2007 Sep; 107(9):734-8. PubMed ID: 17493755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. 3-D reconstruction of the atomic positions in a simulated gold nanocrystal based on discrete tomography: prospects of atomic resolution electron tomography.
    Jinschek JR; Batenburg KJ; Calderon HA; Kilaas R; Radmilovic V; Kisielowski C
    Ultramicroscopy; 2008 May; 108(6):589-604. PubMed ID: 18082327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Tomography experiment of an integrated circuit specimen using 3 MeV electrons in the transmission electron microscope.
    Zhang HB; Zhang XL; Wang Y; Takaoka A
    Rev Sci Instrum; 2007 Jan; 78(1):013701. PubMed ID: 17503922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A Bottom-Up Volume Reconstruction Method for Atom Probe Tomography.
    Ling YT; Cools S; Bogdanowicz J; Fleischmann C; Beenhouwer J; Sijbers J; Vandervorst W
    Microsc Microanal; 2022 Jan; ():1-14. PubMed ID: 35088688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.