These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

276 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22004317)

  • 1. A generalizability analysis of a veterinary school Multiple Mini Interview: effect of number of interviewers, type of interviewers, and number of stations.
    Hecker K; Violato C
    Teach Learn Med; 2011 Oct; 23(4):331-6. PubMed ID: 22004317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assessment of applicants to the veterinary curriculum using a multiple mini-interview method.
    Hecker K; Donnon T; Fuentealba C; Hall D; Illanes O; Morck DW; Muelling C
    J Vet Med Educ; 2009; 36(2):166-73. PubMed ID: 19625664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Using standardized essays in the veterinary medicine admissions process: are the ratings reliable and valid?
    Hecker K; Violato C
    J Vet Med Educ; 2010; 37(3):254-7. PubMed ID: 20847334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Utility of a writing station in the multiple mini-interview.
    Raghavan M; Burnett M; Martin BD; Christensen H; Young DG; Mackalski B; Aoki F
    J Vet Med Educ; 2013; 40(2):177-83. PubMed ID: 23697543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The multiple mini-interview for selection of international medical graduates into family medicine residency education.
    Hofmeister M; Lockyer J; Crutcher R
    Med Educ; 2009 Jun; 43(6):573-9. PubMed ID: 19493182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessment of non-cognitive traits through the admissions multiple mini-interview.
    Lemay JF; Lockyer JM; Collin VT; Brownell AK
    Med Educ; 2007 Jun; 41(6):573-9. PubMed ID: 17518837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Enhancing the reliability of the multiple mini-interview for selecting prospective health care leaders.
    Uijtdehaage S; Doyle L; Parker N
    Acad Med; 2011 Aug; 86(8):1032-9. PubMed ID: 21694560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The acceptability of the multiple mini interview for resident selection.
    Hofmeister M; Lockyer J; Crutcher R
    Fam Med; 2008; 40(10):734-40. PubMed ID: 18979262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The multiple mini-interview: how long is long enough?
    Dodson M; Crotty B; Prideaux D; Carne R; Ward A; de Leeuw E
    Med Educ; 2009 Feb; 43(2):168-74. PubMed ID: 19161488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Multiple mini-interview in selecting medical students.
    Roh H; Lee HJ; Park SB; Yang JH; Kim DJ; Kim SH; Lee SJ; Chae G
    Korean J Med Educ; 2009 Jun; 21(2):103-15. PubMed ID: 25813108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. What does the multiple mini interview have to offer over the panel interview?
    Pau A; Chen YS; Lee VK; Sow CF; De Alwis R
    Med Educ Online; 2016; 21():29874. PubMed ID: 26873337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Multiple mini-interview test characteristics: 'tis better to ask candidates to recall than to imagine.
    Eva KW; Macala C
    Med Educ; 2014 Jun; 48(6):604-13. PubMed ID: 24807436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The reliability and acceptability of the Multiple Mini-Interview as a selection instrument for postgraduate admissions.
    Dore KL; Kreuger S; Ladhani M; Rolfson D; Kurtz D; Kulasegaram K; Cullimore AJ; Norman GR; Eva KW; Bates S; Reiter HI
    Acad Med; 2010 Oct; 85(10 Suppl):S60-3. PubMed ID: 20881706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Multiple mini-interviews versus traditional interviews: stakeholder acceptability comparison.
    Razack S; Faremo S; Drolet F; Snell L; Wiseman J; Pickering J
    Med Educ; 2009 Oct; 43(10):993-1000. PubMed ID: 19769649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The influence of personality type on decision making in the physical therapy admission process.
    Bezner JR; Boucher BK
    J Allied Health; 2001; 30(2):83-91. PubMed ID: 11398234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Introduction of the multiple mini interview into the admissions process at the University of Calgary: acceptability and feasibility.
    Brownell K; Lockyer J; Collin T; Lemay JF
    Med Teach; 2007 May; 29(4):394-6. PubMed ID: 17786758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Discerning quality: using the multiple mini-interview in student selection for the Australian National University Medical School.
    Harris S; Owen C
    Med Educ; 2007 Mar; 41(3):234-41. PubMed ID: 17316207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Predictive validity of the multiple mini-interview for selecting medical trainees.
    Eva KW; Reiter HI; Trinh K; Wasi P; Rosenfeld J; Norman GR
    Med Educ; 2009 Aug; 43(8):767-75. PubMed ID: 19659490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Candidate Evaluation Using Targeted Construct Assessment in the Multiple Mini-Interview: A Multifaceted Rasch Model Analysis.
    McLaughlin JE; Singer D; Cox WC
    Teach Learn Med; 2017; 29(1):68-74. PubMed ID: 27466859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Modified personal interviews: resurrecting reliable personal interviews for admissions?
    Hanson MD; Kulasegaram KM; Woods NN; Fechtig L; Anderson G
    Acad Med; 2012 Oct; 87(10):1330-4. PubMed ID: 22914517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.