298 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22004779)
1. Integrating patients' views into health technology assessment: Analytic hierarchy process (AHP) as a method to elicit patient preferences.
Danner M; Hummel JM; Volz F; van Manen JG; Wiegard B; Dintsios CM; Bastian H; Gerber A; Ijzerman MJ
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2011 Oct; 27(4):369-75. PubMed ID: 22004779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Using the analytic hierarchy process to elicit patient preferences: prioritizing multiple outcome measures of antidepressant drug treatment.
Hummel MJ; Volz F; van Manen JG; Danner M; Dintsios CM; Ijzerman MJ; Gerber A
Patient; 2012; 5(4):225-37. PubMed ID: 23098363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany.
Bekkering GE; Kleijnen J
Eur J Health Econ; 2008 Nov; 9 Suppl 1():5-29. PubMed ID: 18987905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Health technology assessment-based development of a Spanish breast cancer patient decision aid.
Izquierdo F; Gracia J; Guerra M; Blasco JA; Andradas E
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2011 Oct; 27(4):363-8. PubMed ID: 22004778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany].
Bekkering GE; Kleijnen J
Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2008 Dec; 133 Suppl 7():S225-46. PubMed ID: 19034813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparing Analytic Hierarchy Process and Discrete-Choice Experiment to Elicit Patient Preferences for Treatment Characteristics in Age-Related Macular Degeneration.
Danner M; Vennedey V; Hiligsmann M; Fauser S; Gross C; Stock S
Value Health; 2017 Sep; 20(8):1166-1173. PubMed ID: 28964450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A short history of health technology assessment in Germany.
Perleth M; Gibis B; Göhlen B
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2009 Jul; 25 Suppl 1():112-9. PubMed ID: 19500440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Quality of health care, accreditation, and health technology assessment in Croatia: role of agency for quality and accreditation in health].
Mittermayer R; Huić M; Mestrović J
Acta Med Croatica; 2010 Dec; 64(5):425-34. PubMed ID: 21692267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparison of analytic hierarchy process and conjoint analysis methods in assessing treatment alternatives for stroke rehabilitation.
Ijzerman MJ; van Til JA; Bridges JF
Patient; 2012; 5(1):45-56. PubMed ID: 22185216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Health technology assessment: research trends and future priorities in Europe.
Nielsen CP; Funch TM; Kristensen FB
J Health Serv Res Policy; 2011 Jul; 16 Suppl 2():6-15. PubMed ID: 21737525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Identifying patient-relevant endpoints among individuals with schizophrenia: an application of patient-centered health technology assessment.
Kinter ET; Schmeding A; Rudolph I; dosReis S; Bridges JF
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2009 Jan; 25(1):35-41. PubMed ID: 19126249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Patient-based health technology assessment: a vision of the future.
Bridges JF; Jones C
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2007; 23(1):30-5. PubMed ID: 17234014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Patients' perspectives in health technology assessment: a route to robust evidence and fair deliberation.
Facey K; Boivin A; Gracia J; Hansen HP; Lo Scalzo A; Mossman J; Single A
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2010 Jul; 26(3):334-40. PubMed ID: 20584364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Allocating resources for cancer control--resolving multicriteria decision-making using the analytic hierarchy process].
Gróf A
Magy Onkol; 2007; 51(3):197-208. PubMed ID: 17922059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Elicitation of quantitative, choice-based preferences for Person-Centered Care among People living with Dementia in comparison to physicians' judgements in Germany: study protocol for the mixed-methods PreDemCare-study.
Mohr W; Rädke A; Michalowsky B; Hoffmann W
BMC Geriatr; 2022 Jul; 22(1):567. PubMed ID: 35804302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Practical tools and methods for health technology assessment in Europe: structures, methodologies, and tools developed by the European Network for Health Technology Assessment, EUnetHTA.
Kristensen FB; Lampe K; Chase DL; Lee-Robin SH; Wild C; Moharra M; Garrido MV; Nielsen CP; Røttingen JA; Neikter SA; Bistrup ML;
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2009 Dec; 25 Suppl 2():1-8. PubMed ID: 20030885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Patients' preference for involvement in medical decision making: a narrative review.
Say R; Murtagh M; Thomson R
Patient Educ Couns; 2006 Feb; 60(2):102-14. PubMed ID: 16442453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Defining products for a new health technology assessment agency in Madrid, Spain: a survey of decision makers.
Andradas E; Blasco JA; Valentín B; López-Pedraza MJ; Gracia FJ
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2008; 24(1):60-9. PubMed ID: 18218170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Patient preferences for psoriasis treatments: process characteristics can outweigh outcome attributes.
Schaarschmidt ML; Schmieder A; Umar N; Terris D; Goebeler M; Goerdt S; Peitsch WK
Arch Dermatol; 2011 Nov; 147(11):1285-94. PubMed ID: 22106115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [How can the impact of Health Technology Assessment (HTA) in the Austrian healthcare system be assessed? Design of a conceptual framework].
Schumacher I; Zechmeister I
Gesundheitswesen; 2012 Apr; 74(4):257-65. PubMed ID: 21267815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
