298 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22004779)
21. An experimental comparison of fuzzy logic and analytic hierarchy process for medical decision support systems.
Uzoka FM; Obot O; Barker K; Osuji J
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2011 Jul; 103(1):10-27. PubMed ID: 20633949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Patient participation in clinical decision-making in nursing: A comparative study of nurses' and patients' perceptions.
Florin J; Ehrenberg A; Ehnfors M
J Clin Nurs; 2006 Dec; 15(12):1498-508. PubMed ID: 17118072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Patient aspects: a review of fifty-eight Danish HTA reports.
Hansen HP; Lee A; van Randwijk CB
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2011 Oct; 27(4):330-6. PubMed ID: 22004773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Integrating local data into hospital-based healthcare technology assessment: two case studies.
Mitchell MD; Williams K; Brennan PJ; Umscheid CA
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2010 Jul; 26(3):294-300. PubMed ID: 20584358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Health technology assessment (HTA) of optoelectronic biosensors for oncology by analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and Likert scale.
Improta G; Perrone A; Russo MA; Triassi M
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Jul; 19(1):140. PubMed ID: 31277572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The role of health technology assessment on pharmaceutical reimbursement in selected middle-income countries.
Oortwijn W; Mathijssen J; Banta D
Health Policy; 2010 May; 95(2-3):174-84. PubMed ID: 20074829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. How Well Can Analytic Hierarchy Process be Used to Elicit Individual Preferences? Insights from a Survey in Patients Suffering from Age-Related Macular Degeneration.
Danner M; Vennedey V; Hiligsmann M; Fauser S; Gross C; Stock S
Patient; 2016 Oct; 9(5):481-92. PubMed ID: 27255773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Evaluation of patient involvement strategies in health technology assessment in Spain: the viewpoint of HTA researchers.
Toledo-Chávarri A; Triñanes Pego Y; Rodrigo ER; Roteta NI; Novella-Arribas B; Vicente Edo MJ; Gavín Benavent P; Puigdomenech E; Molina Linde JM
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2020 Sep; 37():e25. PubMed ID: 32914735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Do They Align? Congruence Between Patient Preferences of People Living with Cognitive Impairments and Physicians' Judgements for Person-Centered Care: An Analytic Hierarchy Process Study.
Mohr W; Rädke A; Afi A; Weber N; Platen M; Mühlichen F; Scharf A; Michalowsky B; Hoffmann W
J Alzheimers Dis; 2023; 91(2):727-741. PubMed ID: 36502324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Decision-Oriented Health Technology Assessment: One Step Forward in Supporting the Decision-Making Process in Hospitals.
Ritrovato M; Faggiano FC; Tedesco G; Derrico P
Value Health; 2015 Jun; 18(4):505-11. PubMed ID: 26091605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Dear policy maker: have you made up your mind? A discrete choice experiment among policy makers and other health professionals.
Koopmanschap MA; Stolk EA; Koolman X
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2010 Apr; 26(2):198-204. PubMed ID: 20392324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. A content analysis of Health Technology Assessment programs in Latin America.
Arellano LE; Reza M; Blasco JA; Andradas E
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2009 Oct; 25(4):570-6. PubMed ID: 19845988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. [Experiences with and impact of health technology assessment on the German Standing Committee of physicians and patients].
Gibis B; Rheinberger P
Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich; 2002 Feb; 96(2):82-90. PubMed ID: 11921610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Using an analytical hierarchy process (AHP) for weighting items of a measurement scale: a pilot study.
Benaïm C; Perennou DA; Pelissier JY; Daures JP
Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique; 2010 Feb; 58(1):59-63. PubMed ID: 20092973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Patient preferences and healthcare outcomes: an ecological perspective.
Street RL; Elwyn G; Epstein RM
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res; 2012 Apr; 12(2):167-80. PubMed ID: 22458618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Economic evaluations conducted by Canadian health technology assessment agencies: where do we stand?
Tarride JE; McCarron CE; Lim M; Bowen JM; Blackhouse G; Hopkins R; O'Reilly D; Xie F; Goeree R
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2008; 24(4):437-44. PubMed ID: 18828938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. [The analysis of physicians' work: announcing the end of attempts at in vitro fertilization].
Santiago-Delefosse M; Cahen F; Coeffin-Driol C
Encephale; 2003; 29(4 Pt 1):293-305. PubMed ID: 14615699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Program eases decision making.
Turri JJ
Health Prog; 1988 Oct; 69(8):40-4. PubMed ID: 10290384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Are Key Principles for improved health technology assessment supported and used by health technology assessment organizations?
; Neumann PJ; Drummond MF; Jönsson B; Luce BR; Schwartz JS; Siebert U; Sullivan SD
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2010 Jan; 26(1):71-8. PubMed ID: 20059783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Using an innovative criteria weighting tool for stakeholders involvement to rank MSW facility sites with the AHP.
De Feo G; De Gisi S
Waste Manag; 2010 Nov; 30(11):2370-82. PubMed ID: 20444589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
