These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22004945)

  • 1. Assessing the impact of non-differential genotyping errors on rare variant tests of association.
    Powers S; Gopalakrishnan S; Tintle N
    Hum Hered; 2011; 72(3):153-60. PubMed ID: 22004945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assessing the impact of differential genotyping errors on rare variant tests of association.
    Mayer-Jochimsen M; Fast S; Tintle NL
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(3):e56626. PubMed ID: 23472072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluating the impact of genotype errors on rare variant tests of association.
    Cook K; Benitez A; Fu C; Tintle N
    Front Genet; 2014; 5():62. PubMed ID: 24744770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Quantifying the percent increase in minimum sample size for SNP genotyping errors in genetic model-based association studies.
    Kang SJ; Finch SJ; Haynes C; Gordon D
    Hum Hered; 2004; 58(3-4):139-44. PubMed ID: 15812170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Real world scenarios in rare variant association analysis: the impact of imbalance and sample size on the power in silico.
    Zhang X; Basile AO; Pendergrass SA; Ritchie MD
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2019 Jan; 20(1):46. PubMed ID: 30669967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Increase of rejection rate in case-control studies with the differential genotyping error rates.
    Ahn K; Gordon D; Finch SJ
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2009; 8():Article25. PubMed ID: 19492983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. What SNP genotyping errors are most costly for genetic association studies?
    Kang SJ; Gordon D; Finch SJ
    Genet Epidemiol; 2004 Feb; 26(2):132-41. PubMed ID: 14748013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Impact of genotyping errors on statistical power of association tests in genomic analyses: A case study.
    Hou L; Sun N; Mane S; Sayward F; Rajeevan N; Cheung KH; Cho K; Pyarajan S; Aslan M; Miller P; Harvey PD; Gaziano JM; Concato J; Zhao H
    Genet Epidemiol; 2017 Feb; 41(2):152-162. PubMed ID: 28019059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effects of SNP genotyping errors on the power of the Cochran-Armitage linear trend test for case/control association studies.
    Ahn K; Haynes C; Kim W; Fleur RS; Gordon D; Finch SJ
    Ann Hum Genet; 2007 Mar; 71(Pt 2):249-61. PubMed ID: 17096677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Testing for association with a case-parents design in the presence of genotyping errors.
    Morris RW; Kaplan NL
    Genet Epidemiol; 2004 Feb; 26(2):142-54. PubMed ID: 14748014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of genotyping error on type-I error rate of affected sib pair studies with genotyped parents.
    Seaman SR; Holmans P
    Hum Hered; 2005; 59(3):157-64. PubMed ID: 15925894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Microsatellite genotyping errors: detection approaches, common sources and consequences for paternal exclusion.
    Hoffman JI; Amos W
    Mol Ecol; 2005 Feb; 14(2):599-612. PubMed ID: 15660949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Distinct error rates for reference and nonreference genotypes estimated by pedigree analysis.
    Wang RJ; Radivojac P; Hahn MW
    Genetics; 2021 Mar; 217(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 33683359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Parametric model-based statistics for possible genotyping errors and sample stratification in sibling-pair SNP data.
    Korostishevsky M; Malkin I; Spector T; Livshits G
    Genet Epidemiol; 2010 Jan; 34(1):26-33. PubMed ID: 19455577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The impact of genotype calling errors on family-based studies.
    Yan Q; Chen R; Sutcliffe JS; Cook EH; Weeks DE; Li B; Chen W
    Sci Rep; 2016 Jun; 6():28323. PubMed ID: 27328765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reducing false-positive incidental findings with ensemble genotyping and logistic regression based variant filtering methods.
    Hwang KB; Lee IH; Park JH; Hambuch T; Choe Y; Kim M; Lee K; Song T; Neu MB; Gupta N; Kohane IS; Green RC; Kong SW
    Hum Mutat; 2014 Aug; 35(8):936-44. PubMed ID: 24829188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Susceptibility of biallelic haplotype and genotype frequencies to genotyping error.
    Moskvina V; Schmidt KM
    Biometrics; 2006 Dec; 62(4):1116-23. PubMed ID: 17156286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Development and validation of a fetal genotyping assay with potential for noninvasive prenatal diagnosis of hereditary hearing loss.
    Chen Y; Liu Y; Wang B; Mao J; Wang T; Ye K; Ye Y; Cram DS; Li H
    Prenat Diagn; 2016 Dec; 36(13):1233-1241. PubMed ID: 27862068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Correcting for differential genotyping error in genetic association analysis.
    Yuan M; Fang H; Zhang H
    J Hum Genet; 2013 Oct; 58(10):657-66. PubMed ID: 23863749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Hierarchical Bayesian model for rare variant association analysis integrating genotype uncertainty in human sequence data.
    He L; Pitkäniemi J; Sarin AP; Salomaa V; Sillanpää MJ; Ripatti S
    Genet Epidemiol; 2015 Feb; 39(2):89-100. PubMed ID: 25395270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.