162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22005077)
1. Aperius interspinous implant versus open surgical decompression in lumbar spinal stenosis.
Postacchini R; Ferrari E; Cinotti G; Menchetti PP; Postacchini F
Spine J; 2011 Oct; 11(10):933-9. PubMed ID: 22005077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The Felix-trial. Double-blind randomization of interspinous implant or bony decompression for treatment of spinal stenosis related intermittent neurogenic claudication.
Moojen WA; Arts MP; Brand R; Koes BW; Peul WC
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2010 May; 11():100. PubMed ID: 20507568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Is the interspinous process device safe and effective in elderly patients with lumbar degeneration? A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Han B; Chen Y; Liang W; Yang Y; Ding Z; Yin P; Hai Y
Eur Spine J; 2024 Mar; 33(3):881-891. PubMed ID: 38342843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Do patients with lumbar spinal stenosis benefit from decompression of levels with adjacent moderate stenosis? A prospective cohort study from the NORDSTEN study.
Tronstad S; Haug KJ; Myklebust TÅ; Weber C; Brisby H; Austevoll IM; Hellum C; Storheim K; Aaen J; Banitalebi H; Brox JI; Grundnes O; Franssen E; Indrekvam K; Solberg T; Hermansen E
Spine J; 2024 Jun; 24(6):1015-1021. PubMed ID: 38266826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Are There Differences Between Patients with Extreme Stenosis and Non-extreme Stenosis in Terms of Pain, Function or Complications After Spinal Decompression Using a Tubular Retractor System?
Kulkarni AG; Das S; Kunder TS
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2020 Feb; 478(2):348-356. PubMed ID: 31633587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A prospective randomized multi-center study for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis with the X STOP interspinous implant: 1-year results.
Zucherman JF; Hsu KY; Hartjen CA; Mehalic TF; Implicito DA; Martin MJ; Johnson DR; Skidmore GA; Vessa PP; Dwyer JW; Puccio S; Cauthen JC; Ozuna RM
Eur Spine J; 2004 Feb; 13(1):22-31. PubMed ID: 14685830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Long-Term Safety and Efficacy of Minimally Invasive Lumbar Decompression Procedure for the Treatment of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis With Neurogenic Claudication: 2-Year Results of MiDAS ENCORE.
Staats PS; Chafin TB; Golovac S; Kim CK; Li S; Richardson WB; Vallejo R; Wahezi SE; Washabaugh EP; Benyamin RM;
Reg Anesth Pain Med; 2018 Oct; 43(7):789-794. PubMed ID: 30199512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Is the presence of foraminal stenosis associated with outcome in lumbar spinal stenosis patients treated with posterior microsurgical decompression.
Aaen J; Banitalebi H; Austevoll IM; Hellum C; Storheim K; Myklebust TÅ; Anvar M; Weber C; Solberg T; Grundnes O; Brisby H; Indrekvam K; Hermansen E
Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2023 Aug; 165(8):2121-2129. PubMed ID: 37407851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Feasibility, safety, and efficacy of a new percutaneous interspinous device: a retrospective multicenter study.
Marcia S; Hirsch JA; Bellini M; Sadotti G; Manfré L; De Vivo AE; Piras E; Zini G; Zini C
Neuroradiology; 2024 Jun; 66(6):1049-1056. PubMed ID: 38568239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A Review of Emerging Evidence for Utilization of a Percutaneous Interspinous Process Decompression Device to Treat Symptomatic Lumbar Adjacent-Segment Degeneration.
Deer TR; Sayed D; Malinowski MN; Rowe JJ; Jameson JB; Liang K; Sclafani JA
Pain Med; 2019 Dec; 20(Suppl 2):S9-S13. PubMed ID: 31808531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Longitudinal Comparative Analysis of Complications and Subsequent Interventions Following Stand-Alone Interspinous Spacers, Open Decompression, or Fusion for Lumbar Stenosis.
Whang PG; Tran O; Rosner HL
Adv Ther; 2023 Aug; 40(8):3512-3524. PubMed ID: 37289411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Time Course of Asymptomatic Stenosis in Multiple Lumbar Spinal Stenosis-Five-Year Results of Selective Decompression of Symptomatic Levels.
Watanabe K; Otani K; Nikaido T; Kato K; Kobayashi H; Yabuki S; Konno SI; Matsumoto Y
Medicina (Kaunas); 2024 Apr; 60(4):. PubMed ID: 38674282
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Decompression Alone Versus Interspinous/Interlaminar Device Placement for Degenerative Lumbar Pathologies: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Pennington Z; Lakomkin N; Mikula AL; Elsamadicy AA; Astudillo Potes M; Fogelson JL; Grossbach AJ; Elder BD
World Neurosurg; 2024 May; 185():417-434.e3. PubMed ID: 38508384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Incidence of subsequent surgical decompression following minimally invasive approaches to treat lumbar spinal stenosis: A retrospective review.
Shahzad H; Hussain N; D'Souza RS; Bhatti N; Orhurhu V; Abdel-Rasoul M; Simopoulos T; Essandoh MK; Khan SN; Weaver T
Pain Pract; 2024 Mar; 24(3):431-439. PubMed ID: 37955267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effectiveness and safety of interspinous spacer versus decompressive surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Xin JH; Che JJ; Wang Z; Chen YM; Leng B; Wang DL
Medicine (Baltimore); 2023 Nov; 102(46):e36048. PubMed ID: 37986330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Treatment of facet cysts associated with neurogenic intermittent claudication with x-stop.
Abrams J; Hsu K; Kondrashov D; McDermott T; Zucherman J
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2013 Jun; 26(4):218-21. PubMed ID: 22134735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of Short-Term Clinical Results and Radiologic Changes Between Two Different Minimally Invasive Decompressive Surgical Methods for Lumbar Canal Stenosis: Lumbar Spinous Process Splitting Laminectomy and Trans-Interspinous Lumbar Decompression.
Tanaka S; Wada K; Kumagai G; Asari T; Aburakawa S; Yamasaki Y; Yokoyama T; Takeuchi K; Ishibashi Y
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2021 Nov; 46(21):E1136-E1145. PubMed ID: 33813582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Long-term outcome of decompressive surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis in octogenarians.
Shabat S; Arinzon Z; Folman Y; Leitner J; David R; Pevzner E; Gepstein R; Pekarsky I; Shuval I
Eur Spine J; 2008 Feb; 17(2):193-8. PubMed ID: 17940811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparative effectiveness and prognostic factors for outcome of surgical and non-surgical management of lumbar spinal stenosis in an elderly population: protocol for an observational study.
Brøgger HA; Maribo T; Christensen R; Schiøttz-Christensen B
BMJ Open; 2018 Dec; 8(12):e024949. PubMed ID: 30573489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Balancing ability of patients with lumbar spinal canal stenosis.
Ujigo S; Kamei N; Yamada K; Nakamae T; Imada H; Adachi N; Fujimoto Y
Eur Spine J; 2023 Dec; 32(12):4174-4183. PubMed ID: 37217822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
