These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

885 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22005077)

  • 1. Aperius interspinous implant versus open surgical decompression in lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Postacchini R; Ferrari E; Cinotti G; Menchetti PP; Postacchini F
    Spine J; 2011 Oct; 11(10):933-9. PubMed ID: 22005077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Aperius PercLID stand alone interspinous system for the treatment of degenerative lumbar stenosis: experience on 152 cases.
    Nardi P; Cabezas D; Rea G; Pettorini BL
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2010 May; 23(3):203-7. PubMed ID: 20065864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. One-year results of X Stop interspinous implant for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Siddiqui M; Smith FW; Wardlaw D
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 May; 32(12):1345-8. PubMed ID: 17515824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [The DIAM spinal stabilisation system to treat degenerative disease of the lumbosacral spine].
    Hrabálek L; Machác J; Vaverka M
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2009 Oct; 76(5):417-23. PubMed ID: 19912707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Long-term results of percutaneous lumbar decompression mild(®) for spinal stenosis.
    Mekhail N; Vallejo R; Coleman MH; Benyamin RM
    Pain Pract; 2012 Mar; 12(3):184-93. PubMed ID: 21676166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Prospective analysis of clinical evaluation and self-assessment by patients after decompression surgery for degenerative lumbar canal stenosis.
    Haro H; Maekawa S; Hamada Y
    Spine J; 2008; 8(2):380-4. PubMed ID: 17433781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Two-year follow-up after decompressive surgery with and without implantation of an interspinous device for lumbar spinal stenosis: a prospective controlled study.
    Richter A; Halm HF; Hauck M; Quante M
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2014 Aug; 27(6):336-41. PubMed ID: 22643187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. X-stop versus decompressive surgery for lumbar neurogenic intermittent claudication: randomized controlled trial with 2-year follow-up.
    Strömqvist BH; Berg S; Gerdhem P; Johnsson R; Möller A; Sahlstrand T; Soliman A; Tullberg T
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Aug; 38(17):1436-42. PubMed ID: 23403549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of indirect decompression of the lumbar spinal canal following minimally invasive lateral transpsoas interbody fusion: radiographic and outcome analysis.
    Elowitz EH; Yanni DS; Chwajol M; Starke RM; Perin NI
    Minim Invasive Neurosurg; 2011 Oct; 54(5-6):201-6. PubMed ID: 22278781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Muscle-preserving interlaminar decompression for the lumbar spine: a minimally invasive new procedure for lumbar spinal canal stenosis.
    Hatta Y; Shiraishi T; Sakamoto A; Yato Y; Harada T; Mikami Y; Hase H; Kubo T
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Apr; 34(8):E276-80. PubMed ID: 19365236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Clinical outcomes and quality of life 1 year after open microsurgical decompression or implantation of an interspinous stand-alone spacer.
    Sobottke R; Röllinghoff M; Siewe J; Schlegel U; Yagdiran A; Spangenberg M; Lesch R; Eysel P; Koy T
    Minim Invasive Neurosurg; 2010 Aug; 53(4):179-83. PubMed ID: 21132610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Treatment of symptomatic degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis by a percutaneous stand-alone lumbar interspinous implant. Preliminary experience with the Aperius device].
    Collignon F; Fransen P
    Neurochirurgie; 2010 Feb; 56(1):3-7. PubMed ID: 20056260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Depressive burden in the preoperative and early recovery phase predicts poorer surgery outcome among lumbar spinal stenosis patients: a one-year prospective follow-up study.
    Sinikallio S; Aalto T; Airaksinen O; Herno A; Kröger H; Viinamäki H
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Nov; 34(23):2573-8. PubMed ID: 19927107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Interspinous spacer decompression (X-STOP) for lumbar spinal stenosis and degenerative disk disease: a multicenter study with a minimum 3-year follow-up.
    Puzzilli F; Gazzeri R; Galarza M; Neroni M; Panagiotopoulos K; Bolognini A; Callovini G; Agrillo U; Alfieri A
    Clin Neurol Neurosurg; 2014 Sep; 124():166-74. PubMed ID: 25064150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Interspinous distraction in lumbar spinal stenosis: a neurophysiological perspective.
    Schizas C; Pralong E; Tzioupis C; Kulik G
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Nov; 38(24):2113-7. PubMed ID: 24026157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Surgical results in hidden lumbar spinal stenosis detected by axial loaded computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging: an outcome study.
    Willén J; Wessberg PJ; Danielsson B
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Feb; 33(4):E109-15. PubMed ID: 18277859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Clinical analysis following lumbar interspinous devices implant: where we are and where we go.
    Grasso G; Giambartino F; Iacopino DG
    Spinal Cord; 2014 Oct; 52(10):740-3. PubMed ID: 24912549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Interspinous process decompression (IPD) system (X-STOP) for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Chiu JC
    Surg Technol Int; 2006; 15():265-75. PubMed ID: 17029185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Felix-trial. Double-blind randomization of interspinous implant or bony decompression for treatment of spinal stenosis related intermittent neurogenic claudication.
    Moojen WA; Arts MP; Brand R; Koes BW; Peul WC
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2010 May; 11():100. PubMed ID: 20507568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Long-term outcomes of two different decompressive techniques for lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Fu YS; Zeng BF; Xu JG
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Mar; 33(5):514-8. PubMed ID: 18317196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 45.