These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

92 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22005394)

  • 1. Manipulations of attention enhance self-regulation.
    Hanif A; Ferrey AE; Frischen A; Pozzobon K; Eastwood JD; Smilek D; Fenske MJ
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2012 Jan; 139(1):104-10. PubMed ID: 22005394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cognitive control mechanisms resolve conflict through cortical amplification of task-relevant information.
    Egner T; Hirsch J
    Nat Neurosci; 2005 Dec; 8(12):1784-90. PubMed ID: 16286928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Resolving task rule incongruence during task switching by competitor rule suppression.
    Meiran N; Hsieh S; Dimov E
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Jul; 36(4):992-1002. PubMed ID: 20565214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The active inhibition for the processing of visual irrelevant conflict information.
    Mao W; Wang Y
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2008 Jan; 67(1):47-53. PubMed ID: 17999937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The auditory-evoked N2 and P3 components in the stop-signal task: indices of inhibition, response-conflict or error-detection?
    Dimoska A; Johnstone SJ; Barry RJ
    Brain Cogn; 2006 Nov; 62(2):98-112. PubMed ID: 16814442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Automaticity of cognitive control: goal priming in response-inhibition paradigms.
    Verbruggen F; Logan GD
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Sep; 35(5):1381-8. PubMed ID: 19686032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Self-control relies on glucose as a limited energy source: willpower is more than a metaphor.
    Gailliot MT; Baumeister RF; DeWall CN; Maner JK; Plant EA; Tice DM; Brewer LE; Schmeichel BJ
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2007 Feb; 92(2):325-36. PubMed ID: 17279852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. How task representations guide attention: further evidence for the shielding function of task sets.
    Dreisbach G; Haider H
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Mar; 35(2):477-86. PubMed ID: 19271860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Forgetting all else: on the antecedents and consequences of goal shielding.
    Shah JY; Friedman R; Kruglanski AW
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2002 Dec; 83(6):1261-80. PubMed ID: 12500810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Influence of response prepotency strength, general working memory resources, and specific working memory load on the ability to inhibit predominant responses: a comparison of young and elderly participants.
    Grandjean J; Collette F
    Brain Cogn; 2011 Nov; 77(2):237-47. PubMed ID: 21885178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. When motor attention improves selective attention: the dissociating role of saliency.
    Symes E; Ottoboni G; Tucker M; Ellis R; Tessari A
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Jul; 63(7):1387-97. PubMed ID: 19921595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Executive and motivational inhibition: associations with self-report measures related to inhibition.
    Shuster J; Toplak ME
    Conscious Cogn; 2009 Jun; 18(2):471-80. PubMed ID: 19233688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Response inhibition in motor and oculomotor conflict tasks: different mechanisms, different dynamics?
    Wijnen JG; Ridderinkhof KR
    Brain Cogn; 2007 Apr; 63(3):260-70. PubMed ID: 17069944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Common and distinct neural substrates of attentional control in an integrated Simon and spatial Stroop task as assessed by event-related fMRI.
    Liu X; Banich MT; Jacobson BL; Tanabe JL
    Neuroimage; 2004 Jul; 22(3):1097-106. PubMed ID: 15219581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The shielding function of task sets and its relaxation during task switching.
    Dreisbach G; Wenke D
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Nov; 37(6):1540-6. PubMed ID: 21707220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Self-regulation of priming effects on behavior.
    Gollwitzer PM; Sheeran P; Trötschel R; Webb TL
    Psychol Sci; 2011 Jul; 22(7):901-7. PubMed ID: 21652777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The remains of the trial: goal-determined inter-trial suppression of selective attention.
    Lleras A; Levinthal BR; Kawahara J
    Prog Brain Res; 2009; 176():195-213. PubMed ID: 19733758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Precueing spatial S-R correspondence: is there regulation of expected response conflict?
    Wühr P; Kunde W
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Aug; 34(4):872-83. PubMed ID: 18665732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Alpha power and coherence primarily reflect neural activity related to stages of motor response during a continuous monitoring task.
    Moore RA; Gale A; Morris PH; Forrester D
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2008 Aug; 69(2):79-89. PubMed ID: 18430481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reaction time inhibition from subliminal cues: is it related to inhibition of return?
    Mele S; Savazzi S; Marzi CA; Berlucchi G
    Neuropsychologia; 2008 Feb; 46(3):810-9. PubMed ID: 18206184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.