355 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22005864)
21. Use of All-polyethylene Tibial Components in Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty Increases the Risk of Early Failure.
Koh IJ; Suhl KH; Kim MW; Kim MS; Choi KY; In Y
J Knee Surg; 2017 Oct; 30(8):807-815. PubMed ID: 28086245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Cemented, cementless or hybrid fixation options in total knee arthroplasty for osteoarthritis and other non-traumatic diseases.
Nakama GY; Peccin MS; Almeida GJ; Lira Neto Ode A; Queiroz AA; Navarro RD
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2012 Oct; 10():CD006193. PubMed ID: 23076921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. All-Polyethylene Tibial Components: An Analysis of Long-Term Outcomes and Infection.
Houdek MT; Wagner ER; Wyles CC; Watts CD; Cass JR; Trousdale RT
J Arthroplasty; 2016 Jul; 31(7):1476-82. PubMed ID: 27067171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Revision of Unicompartmental to Total Knee Arthroplasty: Does the Unicompartmental Implant (Metal-Backed vs All-Polyethylene) Impact the Total Knee Arthroplasty?
Scott CEH; Powell-Bowns MFR; MacDonald DJ; Simpson PM; Wade FA
J Arthroplasty; 2018 Jul; 33(7):2203-2209. PubMed ID: 29525342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Survivorship of cemented total knee arthroplasty.
Font-Rodriguez DE; Scuderi GR; Insall JN
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1997 Dec; (345):79-86. PubMed ID: 9418624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Randomized clinical trial of rotating-platform and fixed-bearing total knee arthroplasty: no clinically detectable differences at five years.
Kalisvaart MM; Pagnano MW; Trousdale RT; Stuart MJ; Hanssen AD
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2012 Mar; 94(6):481-9. PubMed ID: 22437996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Low-conforming all-polyethylene tibial component not inferior to metal-backed component in cemented total knee arthroplasty: prospective, randomized radiostereometric analysis study of the AGC total knee prosthesis.
Adalberth G; Nilsson KG; Byström S; Kolstad K; Milbrink J
J Arthroplasty; 2000 Sep; 15(6):783-92. PubMed ID: 11021456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Survival analysis of primary cemented total knee arthroplasty: which designs last?
Forster MC
J Arthroplasty; 2003 Apr; 18(3):265-70. PubMed ID: 12728416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. All-polyethylene versus metal-backed and stemmed tibial components in cemented total knee arthroplasty. A prospective, randomised RSA study.
Adalberth G; Nilsson KG; Byström S; Kolstad K; Milbrink J
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2001 Aug; 83(6):825-31. PubMed ID: 11521922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. [A comparison of all-polyethylene and metal-backed tibial components in total knee arthroplasty].
Dojcinovic S; Ait Si Selmi T; Servien E; Verdonk PC; Neyret P
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2007 Jun; 93(4):364-72. PubMed ID: 17646818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Survivorship and clinical outcome of the minimally invasive Uniglide medial fixed bearing, all-polyethylene tibia, unicompartmental knee arthroplasty at a mean follow-up of 7.3years.
Forster-Horváth C; Artz N; Hassaballa MA; Robinson JR; Porteous AJ; Murray JR; Newman JH
Knee; 2016 Dec; 23(6):981-986. PubMed ID: 27506988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Clinical comparison of all-polyethylene and metal-backed tibial components in total knee arthroplasty.
Apel DM; Tozzi JM; Dorr LD
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1991 Dec; (273):243-52. PubMed ID: 1959277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. All-poly tibial component better than metal-backed: a randomized RSA study.
Norgren B; Dalén T; Nilsson KG
Knee; 2004 Jun; 11(3):189-96. PubMed ID: 15194094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. When Would a Metal-Backed Component Become Cost-Effective Over an All-Polyethylene Tibia in Total Knee Arthroplasty?
Browne JA; Dempsey IJ; Novicoff W; Wanchek T
Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ); 2018 Jun; 47(6):. PubMed ID: 29979808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Survivorship comparison of all-polyethylene and metal-backed tibial components in cruciate-substituting total knee arthroplasty--Chinese experience.
Shen B; Yang J; Zhou Z; Kang P; Wang L; Pei F
Int Orthop; 2009 Oct; 33(5):1243-7. PubMed ID: 18688613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Do bone loss and reconstruction procedures differ at revision of cemented unicompartmental knee prostheses according to the use of metal-back or all-polyethylene tibial component?
Rouanet T; Combes A; Migaud H; Pasquier G
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2013 Oct; 99(6):687-92. PubMed ID: 23810395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Proximal tibial strain in medial unicompartmental knee replacements: A biomechanical study of implant design.
Scott CE; Eaton MJ; Nutton RW; Wade FA; Pankaj P; Evans SL
Bone Joint J; 2013 Oct; 95-B(10):1339-47. PubMed ID: 24078529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Isolated revision of failed metal-backed patellar components: outcome with minimum 4-year follow-up.
Burke WV; Ammeen DJ; Engh GA
J Arthroplasty; 2005 Dec; 20(8):998-1001. PubMed ID: 16376254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The all-polyethylene tibial component in primary total knee arthroplasty.
Gioe TJ; Maheshwari AV
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2010 Feb; 92(2):478-87. PubMed ID: 20124081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Metal-backed and all-polyethylene tibial components in total knee replacement.
Rodriguez JA; Baez N; Rasquinha V; Ranawat CS
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2001 Nov; (392):174-83. PubMed ID: 11716380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
