These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
354 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22005864)
41. All-polyethylene and metal-backed tibial components in total knee arthroplasty: a matched pair analysis of functional outcome. Najibi S; Iorio R; Surdam JW; Whang W; Appleby D; Healy WL J Arthroplasty; 2003 Oct; 18(7 Suppl 1):9-15. PubMed ID: 14560404 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Cemented polyethylene versus uncemented metal-backed glenoid components in total shoulder arthroplasty: a prospective, double-blind, randomized study. Boileau P; Avidor C; Krishnan SG; Walch G; Kempf JF; Molé D J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2002; 11(4):351-9. PubMed ID: 12195253 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Total knee arthroplasty with 4.4 mm of tibial polyethylene an update. Meding JB; Wing JT; Ritter MA J Arthroplasty; 2010 Aug; 25(5):772-4. PubMed ID: 19625160 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. A comparison in proximal tibial strain between metal-backed and all-polyethylene anatomic graduated component total knee arthroplasty tibial components. Small SR; Berend ME; Ritter MA; Buckley CA J Arthroplasty; 2010 Aug; 25(5):820-5. PubMed ID: 20638615 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Mechanisms of failure of the femoral and tibial components in total knee arthroplasty. Windsor RE; Scuderi GR; Moran MC; Insall JN Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1989 Nov; (248):15-9; discussion 19-20. PubMed ID: 2805473 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Monoblock all-polyethylene tibial components have a lower risk of early revision than metal-backed modular components. Mohan V; Inacio MC; Namba RS; Sheth D; Paxton EW Acta Orthop; 2013 Dec; 84(6):530-6. PubMed ID: 24237424 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. All-polyethylene tibial components are not inferior to metal-backed tibial components in long-term follow-up of knee arthroplasties. Yassin M; Garti A; Weissbrot M; Ashkenazi U; Khatib M; Robinson D Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2015 Aug; 25(6):1087-91. PubMed ID: 26006786 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Early to Midterm Clinical and Radiographic Survivorship of the All-Polyethylene Versus Modular Metal-Backed Tibia Component in Primary Total Knee Replacement. Herschmiller T; Bradley KE; Wellman SS; Attarian DE J Surg Orthop Adv; 2019; 28(2):108-114. PubMed ID: 31411955 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Metal-backed versus all-polyethylene tibias in megaprostheses of the distal femur. Crosby SN; Polkowski GG; Schwartz HS; Shinar AA; Holt GE J Arthroplasty; 2011 Apr; 26(3):451-7. PubMed ID: 20334995 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Fixation and clinical outcome of uncemented peri-apatite-coated van Hamersveld KT; Marang-van de Mheen PJ; Tsonaka R; Valstar ER; Toksvig-Larsen S Bone Joint J; 2017 Nov; 99-B(11):1467-1476. PubMed ID: 29092985 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Should we reconsider all-polyethylene tibial implants in total knee replacement? Muller SD; Deehan DJ; Holland JP; Outterside SE; Kirk LM; Gregg PJ; McCaskie AW J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2006 Dec; 88(12):1596-602. PubMed ID: 17159170 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. All-Polyethylene Versus Metal-Backed Tibial Components in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Bonanzinga T; Gambaro FM; Iacono F; Leogrande F; Di Lascio L; Marcacci M J Arthroplasty; 2024 May; 39(5):1353-1360. PubMed ID: 37931827 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Comparison of metal-backed and all-polyethylene tibial components in cruciate condylar total knee arthroplasty. Rand JA J Arthroplasty; 1993 Jun; 8(3):307-13. PubMed ID: 8326313 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. All-polyethylene and metal-backed tibias have similar outcomes at 10 years: a randomized level I [corrected] evidence study. Gioe TJ; Stroemer ES; Santos ER Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2007 Feb; 455():212-8. PubMed ID: 17006363 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Efficacy of cementless porous tantalum tibial components versus cemented tibial components in primary total knee arthroplasty: A meta-analysis. Li L; Pan C; Zhang X; Liu W; Zhang T; Liu Y; Li J; Ma Y; Jia C; Liu X; Shi C Medicine (Baltimore); 2024 Apr; 103(14):e37697. PubMed ID: 38579049 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. [All-polyethylene tibial component in Walter-Motorlet total knee arthroplasty. Long-term outcomes]. Rybka V; Vavřík P; Landor I; Denk F; Hach J; Krůta T; Síbr M Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2014; 81(2):122-8. PubMed ID: 25105786 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. A randomised trial of all-polyethylene and metal-backed tibial components in unicompartmental arthroplasty of the knee. Hutt JR; Farhadnia P; Massé V; LaVigne M; Vendittoli PA Bone Joint J; 2015 Jun; 97-B(6):786-92. PubMed ID: 26033058 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. The role of the cemented all-polyethylene tibial component in total knee replacement: a 30-year patient follow-up and review of the literature. Blumenfeld TJ; Scott RD Knee; 2010 Dec; 17(6):412-6. PubMed ID: 20060725 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Early failure of a unicompartmental knee arthroplasty design with an all-polyethylene tibial component. Saenz CL; McGrath MS; Marker DR; Seyler TM; Mont MA; Bonutti PM Knee; 2010 Jan; 17(1):53-6. PubMed ID: 19553128 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Cementless Metal-Backed Patellar Components in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: An Average 10-Year Follow-Up. Jouflas AC; Nadar AC; Royster BW; Smith LS; Ziegele MJ; Yakkanti MR; Malkani AL J Arthroplasty; 2023 Jun; 38(6S):S137-S144. PubMed ID: 36791887 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]