These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2200632)

  • 1. A double-blind comparison of iopromide and iopamidol in intravenous urography.
    Renwick IG; Fowler RC
    Clin Radiol; 1990 Jun; 41(6):405-7. PubMed ID: 2200632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A randomised, double-blind trial of iomeprol and iopromide in intravenous excretory urography.
    Harding JR; Bertazzoli M; Spinazzi A
    Eur J Radiol; 1994 May; 18 Suppl 1():S93-6. PubMed ID: 8020526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Low dose low osmolar intravenous urography.
    Eyes BE; Goldman M; Nixon TE; Scally J; Brown A
    Clin Radiol; 1987 Jul; 38(4):403-5. PubMed ID: 3304790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparison of iopromide with iopamidol and iohexol for contrast-enhanced computed tomography.
    Goldberg SN; Abrahams J; Drayer BP; Golding S; Bernardino M; Brunetti J
    Invest Radiol; 1994 May; 29 Suppl 1():S76-83; discussion S93. PubMed ID: 8071050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Ioversol in intravenous excretory urography. Evaluation of radiographic quality, patient tolerance and safety in four clinical studies.
    Jahn H; Müller-Späth R
    Ann Radiol (Paris); 1992; 35(4 Pt 2):297-302. PubMed ID: 1296496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Undesirable side effects of contrast media during i.v. DSA--a comparison of 2 nonionic contrast media].
    Gross-Fengels W; Neufang KF; Siebert C; Lanfermann H; Steinbrich W
    Rontgenblatter; 1990 Apr; 43(4):144-9. PubMed ID: 2187230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Iomeprol versus iopromide for intravenous urography.
    de Geeter P; Melchior H
    Br J Radiol; 1994 Oct; 67(802):958-63. PubMed ID: 8000839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Iodixanol in intravenous urography: a comparison of iodixanol 270 mgI/ml, iodixanol 320 mgI/ml and iopamidol 300 mgI/ml (NIOPAM).
    Conroy RM; Bjartveit K; Sheppick A; Long U; Masterson J
    Clin Radiol; 1994 May; 49(5):337-40. PubMed ID: 8013200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A double-blind study of iopromide 300 for peripheral arteriography. Results of a multi-institutional comparison of iopromide with iohexol and iopamidol.
    Druy EM; Bettmann MA; Jeans W
    Invest Radiol; 1994 May; 29 Suppl 1():S102-5; discussion S106. PubMed ID: 8071036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A double-blind study comparing the efficiency, tolerance and renal effects of iopromide and iopamidol.
    Kennedy C; Rickards D; Lee S; Sharp MB; Dawson P
    Br J Radiol; 1988 Apr; 61(724):288-93. PubMed ID: 3285943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Efficacy and safety of iopromide for excretory urography.
    Newhouse JH; Landman J; Lang E; Amis ES; Goldman S; Khazan R; Leder R; Hedgcock M
    Invest Radiol; 1994 May; 29 Suppl 1():S68-73. PubMed ID: 8071049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of iopromide with iohexol and iopamidol in coronary arteriography and left ventriculography.
    Bergelson B; Bettmann MA; Wexler L; Wilson R; Dyet J
    Invest Radiol; 1994 May; 29 Suppl 1():S107-11; discussion S118-9. PubMed ID: 8071037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of iopromide and iopamidol in left ventricular angiography and in coronary angiography.
    Dyet JF; Carter EC; Hartley WC
    Br J Radiol; 1990 Sep; 63(753):700-5. PubMed ID: 2205329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Double-blind study of the safety, tolerance, and diagnostic efficacy of iopromide as compared with iopamidol and iohexol in patients requiring aortography and visceral angiography.
    Faykus MH; Cope C; Athanasoulis C; Druy EM; Hedgcock M; Miller FJ; Bron K
    Invest Radiol; 1994 May; 29 Suppl 1():S98-101; discussion S106. PubMed ID: 8071053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A randomized, double-blind, parallel group trial of iomeprol, iohexol and iopamidol in intravenous urography.
    Harding JR; Bertazzoli M; Spinazzi A
    Br J Radiol; 1995 Jul; 68(811):712-5. PubMed ID: 7640924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Evaluation of efficacy and tolerability of ioversol in intravenous urography. A comparative double-blind study versus iopamidol].
    Joffre F; Rousseau H; Aziza R
    Ann Radiol (Paris); 1992; 35(4 Pt 2):288-92. PubMed ID: 1296494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison between the efficacy of dimeric and monomeric non-ionic contrast media (iodixanol vs iopromide) in urography in patients with mild to moderate renal insufficiency.
    Stacul F; Cova M; Assante M; Hougens Grynne B; Haider T
    Br J Radiol; 1998 Sep; 71(849):918-22. PubMed ID: 10195004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Urography with monomeric and dimeric nonionic contrast media: comparative, randomized, double-blind study of iotrolan 280 and iopromide 300.
    Taenzer V; Wenzel-Hora BI
    Fortschr Geb Rontgenstrahlen Nuklearmed Erganzungsbd; 1989; 128():116-8. PubMed ID: 2568778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Comparison of iopamidol 150 and 370 with the same iodine dosage (37 g) in urography].
    Crespi-Porro R; Conti A; Cabella R
    Radiol Med; 1991 Oct; 82(4):480-3. PubMed ID: 1767056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Low dose urography. A clinical comparison of three low osmolar (ratio 3) contrast media.
    Björk L; Zachrisson BF
    Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh); 1986; 27(5):557-9. PubMed ID: 3799228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.