These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
22. The role of suppression in the upward spread of masking. Yasin I; Plack CJ J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2005 Dec; 6(4):368-77. PubMed ID: 16261268 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The effects of a high-frequency suppressor on tuning curves and derived basilar-membrane response functions. Yasin I; Plack CJ J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Jul; 114(1):322-32. PubMed ID: 12880044 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Binaural processing model based on contralateral inhibition. III. Dependence on temporal parameters. Breebaart J; van de Par S; Kohlrausch A J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Aug; 110(2):1105-17. PubMed ID: 11519578 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Illusory auditory continuity despite neural evidence to the contrary. Riecke L; Micheyl C; Oxenham AJ Adv Exp Med Biol; 2013; 787():483-9. PubMed ID: 23716255 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. A further test of the linearity of temporal summation in forward masking. Plack CJ; Carcagno S; Oxenham AJ J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Oct; 122(4):1880-3. PubMed ID: 17902824 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Independent effects of temporal expectation and stimulus intensity in audition. Schnuerch R; Kreitz C; Lange K Atten Percept Psychophys; 2013 Oct; 75(7):1520-32. PubMed ID: 23757047 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Effects of relative and absolute frequency in the spectral weighting of loudness. Joshi SN; Wróblewski M; Schmid KK; Jesteadt W J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Jan; 139(1):373-83. PubMed ID: 26827032 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The role of suppression in psychophysical measures of frequency selectivity. Jesteadt W; Norton SJ J Acoust Soc Am; 1985 Jul; 78(1 Pt 2):365-74. PubMed ID: 2993394 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Current distributions in the cat cochlea: a modelling and electrophysiological study. O'Leary SJ; Black RC; Clark GM Hear Res; 1985 Jun; 18(3):273-81. PubMed ID: 3840160 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Auditory brain stem responses from human infants: pure-tone masking profiles for clicks and filtered clicks. Folsom RC J Acoust Soc Am; 1985 Aug; 78(2):555-62. PubMed ID: 4031254 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Forward masking as a method of measuring place specificity of neural excitation in cochlear implants: a review of methods and interpretation. McKay CM J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Mar; 131(3):2209-24. PubMed ID: 22423717 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Temporal resolution and temporal masking properties of transient stimuli: data and an auditory model. Wiegrebe L; Krumbholz K J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 May; 105(5):2746-56. PubMed ID: 10335627 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Identification of stimulus cues in narrow-band tone-in-noise detection using sparse observer models. Schönfelder VH; Wichmann FA J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Jul; 134(1):447-63. PubMed ID: 23862820 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Auditory steady-state evoked potentials vs. compound action potentials for the measurement of suppression tuning curves in the sedated dog puppy. Markessis E; Poncelet L; Colin C; Hoonhorst I; Collet G; Deltenre P; Moore BC Int J Audiol; 2010 Jun; 49(6):455-62. PubMed ID: 20482293 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Intensity and frequency resolution: masking of absolute identification and fixed and roving discrimination. Mori S; Ward LM J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Jan; 91(1):246-55. PubMed ID: 1737875 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]