131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22007754)
21. Low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion/cannot exclude high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL-H) is a unique category of cytologic abnormality associated with distinctive HPV and histopathologic CIN 2+ detection rates.
Barron S; Li Z; Austin RM; Zhao C
Am J Clin Pathol; 2014 Feb; 141(2):239-46. PubMed ID: 24436272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Atypical squamous cells-cannot exclude high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (ASC-H): a result not to be ignored.
Barreth D; Schepansky A; Capstick V; Johnson G; Steed H; Faught W
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2006 Dec; 28(12):1095-1098. PubMed ID: 17169233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Significance of high-risk human papillomavirus DNA detection in women 50 years and older with squamous cell papanicolaou test abnormalities.
Zhao C; Zhao S; Heider A; Austin RM
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2010 Aug; 134(8):1130-5. PubMed ID: 20670132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Prospective evaluation of p16/Ki-67 dual-stained cytology for managing women with abnormal Papanicolaou cytology: PALMS study results.
Bergeron C; Ikenberg H; Sideri M; Denton K; Bogers J; Schmidt D; Alameda F; Keller T; Rehm S; Ridder R;
Cancer Cytopathol; 2015 Jun; 123(6):373-81. PubMed ID: 25891096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. HPV infection and p16 promoter methylation as predictors of ASC-US/LSIL progression.
Lee H; Lee EJ
Cancer Cytopathol; 2016 Jan; 124(1):58-65. PubMed ID: 26335500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. [Verification of doubtful PAP smear results of women included in the screening program in the Podlaskie province].
Błońska E; Knapp PA
Ginekol Pol; 2013 Aug; 84(8):691-5. PubMed ID: 24191502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Distribution of human papillomavirus types in ThinPrep Papanicolaou tests classified according to the Bethesda 2001 terminology and correlations with patient age and biopsy outcomes.
Evans MF; Adamson CS; Papillo JL; St John TL; Leiman G; Cooper K
Cancer; 2006 Mar; 106(5):1054-64. PubMed ID: 16421920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. [Comment on diagnosis of atypical squamous cells using new the Bethesda system 2001].
Wang Y; Bian ML; Liu J
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2004 Jan; 39(1):27-9. PubMed ID: 14989984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Reporting of atypical squamous cells, cannot exclude a high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (ASC-H) on cervical samples: is it significant?
Selvaggi SM
Diagn Cytopathol; 2003 Jul; 29(1):38-41. PubMed ID: 12827715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Low-grade pap smears containing occasional high-grade cells as a predictor of high-grade dysplasia.
Power P; Gregoire J; Duggan M; Nation J
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2006 Oct; 28(10):884-887. PubMed ID: 17140504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Atypical squamous cells, cannot exclude high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion: cytohistologic correlation study with diagnostic pitfalls.
Mokhtar GA; Delatour NL; Assiri AH; Gilliatt MA; Senterman M; Islam S
Acta Cytol; 2008; 52(2):169-77. PubMed ID: 18499989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The value of duplicate slides on atypical squamous cells, cannot exclude high-grade intraepithelial lesion.
Zhang S; Kelly B; Hospodar E; Thibodeaux J; Thomas J; Abreo F
Diagn Cytopathol; 2012 Jan; 40(1):14-8. PubMed ID: 22180233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The importance of immediate verification of a cervical cytological abnormality with histology.
Kabaca C; Sariibrahim B; Keleli I; Karateke A; Cesur S; Cetiner H
Indian J Cancer; 2013; 50(4):292-6. PubMed ID: 24369197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. World wide web-based cytological analysis of atypical squamous cells cannot exclude high-grade intraepithelial lesions.
Washiya K; Takamizu R; Kumagai Y; Himeji Y; Kobayashi T; Iwai M; Watanabe J
Acta Cytol; 2012; 56(1):47-54. PubMed ID: 22236745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Atypical squamous cells, cannot exclude high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion: diagnostic performance, human papillomavirus testing, and follow-up results.
Srodon M; Parry Dilworth H; Ronnett BM
Cancer; 2006 Feb; 108(1):32-8. PubMed ID: 16136595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Immunocytochemistry of p16INK4a in liquid-based cervicovaginal specimens with modified Papanicolaou counterstaining.
Negri G; Moretto G; Menia E; Vittadello F; Kasal A; Mian C; Egarter-Vigl E
J Clin Pathol; 2006 Aug; 59(8):827-30. PubMed ID: 16467166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Liquid-based cytology: do ancillary techniques enhance detection of epithelial abnormalities?
Mishra S; Husain N; Awasthi NP; Pradeep Y; Roohi R; Saxena S
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2018 Jul; 298(1):159-169. PubMed ID: 29728850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Fractal dimension of chromatin texture of squamous intraepithelial lesions of cervix.
Dey P; Banik T
Diagn Cytopathol; 2012 Feb; 40(2):152-4. PubMed ID: 22246932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The impact of LSIL-H terminology on patient follow-up patterns: a comparison with LSIL and ASC-H.
Thrall MJ; Galfione SK; Smith DA
Diagn Cytopathol; 2013 Nov; 41(11):960-4. PubMed ID: 23554221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Comparison of the clinical significance of the Papanicolaou test interpretations LSIL cannot rule out HSIL and ASC-H.
Difurio MJ; Mailhiot T; Sundborg MJ; Nauschuetz KK
Diagn Cytopathol; 2010 May; 38(5):313-7. PubMed ID: 19813258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
