These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2200818)

  • 1. A confocal microscopic study of some factors affecting the adaptation of a light-cured glass ionomer to tooth tissue.
    Watson TF
    J Dent Res; 1990 Aug; 69(8):1531-8. PubMed ID: 2200818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Adhesion of resin-modified glass-ionomer cements may affect the integrity of tooth structure in the open sandwich technique.
    Czarnecka B; Kruszelnicki A; Kao A; Strykowska M; Nicholson JW
    Dent Mater; 2014 Dec; 30(12):e301-5. PubMed ID: 24950810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Microleakage of light-cured resin and resin-modified glass-ionomer dentin bonding agents applied with co-cure vs pre-cure technique.
    Tulunoglu O; Uçtaşh M; Alaçam A; Omürlü H
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(4):292-8. PubMed ID: 11203833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of flowable composite liner and glass ionomer liner on class II gingival marginal adaptation of direct composite restorations with different bonding strategies.
    Aggarwal V; Singla M; Yadav S; Yadav H
    J Dent; 2014 May; 42(5):619-25. PubMed ID: 24631232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Directed polymerization shrinkage versus a horizontal incremental filling technique: interfacial adaptation in vivo in Class II cavities.
    van Dijken JW; Hörstedt P; Waern R
    Am J Dent; 1998 Aug; 11(4):165-72. PubMed ID: 10388370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Shear bond strength of light-cured glass ionomer to enamel and dentin.
    McCaghren RA; Retief DH; Bradley EL; Denys FR
    J Dent Res; 1990 Jan; 69(1):40-5. PubMed ID: 2406305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of curing unit and adhesive system on marginal adaptation of composite restorations.
    Casselli DS; Faria-e-Silva AL; Casselli H; Martins LR
    Gen Dent; 2012; 60(6):e408-12. PubMed ID: 23220321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Adhesion of resin composite to hydrofluoric acid-exposed enamel and dentin in repair protocols.
    Saracoglu A; Ozcan M; Kumbuloglu O; Turkun M
    Oper Dent; 2011; 36(5):545-53. PubMed ID: 21859315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Marginal adaptation of compomers in Class I and V cavities in primary molars.
    el-Kalla IH
    Am J Dent; 1999 Feb; 12(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 10477997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of various surface protections on the margin microleakage of resin-modified glass ionomer cements.
    Chuang SF; Jin YT; Tsai PF; Wong TY
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Sep; 86(3):309-14. PubMed ID: 11552169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effect of additional enamel etching and a flowable composite to the interfacial integrity of Class II adhesive composite restorations.
    Belli S; Inokoshi S; Ozer F; Pereira PN; Ogata M; Tagami J
    Oper Dent; 2001; 26(1):70-5. PubMed ID: 11203780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of etching agent on dentinal adhesive interface in primary teeth.
    Rontani RM; Ducatti CH; Garcia-Godoy F; De Goes MF
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2000; 24(3):205-9. PubMed ID: 11314144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Selective enamel etching: effect on marginal adaptation of self-etch LED-cured bond systems in aged Class I composite restorations.
    Souza-Junior EJ; Prieto LT; Araújo CT; Paulillo LA
    Oper Dent; 2012; 37(2):195-204. PubMed ID: 22313271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Marginal microleakage of resin-modified glass-ionomer and composite resin restorations: effect of using etch-and-rinse and self-etch adhesives.
    Khoroushi M; Karvandi TM; Kamali B; Mazaheri H
    Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(3):378-83. PubMed ID: 23059577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Bond strength and interface micromorphology of an improved resin-modified glass ionomer cement.
    Pereira PN; Yamada T; Tei R; Tagami J
    Am J Dent; 1997 Jun; 10(3):128-32. PubMed ID: 9545887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. ER-YAG laser pretreatment effect on in vitro secondary caries formation around composite restorations.
    Ceballos L; Toledano M; Osorio R; García-Godoy F; Flaitz C; Hicks J
    Am J Dent; 2001 Feb; 14(1):46-9. PubMed ID: 11806480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of conditioner on bond strength of glass-ionomer adhesive to dentin/enamel with and without smear layer interposition.
    Inoue S; Abe Y; Yoshida Y; De Munck J; Sano H; Suzuki K; Lambrechts P; Van Meerbeek B
    Oper Dent; 2004; 29(6):685-92. PubMed ID: 15646225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Self-etching primer vs phosphoric acid: an alternative concept for composite-to-enamel bonding.
    Hannig M; Reinhardt KJ; Bott B
    Oper Dent; 1999; 24(3):172-80. PubMed ID: 10530279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Clinically successful dentin and enamel bonding.
    Ibsen R; Ouellet D; Strassler H
    Am J Dent; 1989 Jul; 2 Spec No():125-31. PubMed ID: 2700301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cavity preparation devices: effect on microleakage of Class V resin-based composite restorations.
    Setien VJ; Cobb DS; Denehy GE; Vargas MA
    Am J Dent; 2001 Jun; 14(3):157-62. PubMed ID: 11572294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.