These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Quality of Reporting Randomized Controlled Trials in Five Leading Neurology Journals in 2008 and 2013 Using the Modified "Risk of Bias" Tool. Zhai X; Cui J; Wang Y; Qu Z; Mu Q; Li P; Zhang C; Yang M; Chen X; Chen Z; Li M World Neurosurg; 2017 Mar; 99():687-694.e7. PubMed ID: 28089838 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Assessing risk of bias in randomised clinical trials included in Cochrane Reviews: the why is easy, the how is a challenge. Hróbjartsson A; Boutron I; Turner L; Altman DG; Moher D; Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2013 Apr; 2013(4):ED000058. PubMed ID: 23728703 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Assessing baseline imbalance in randomised trials: implications for the Cochrane risk of bias tool. Corbett MS; Higgins JP; Woolacott NF Res Synth Methods; 2014 Mar; 5(1):79-85. PubMed ID: 26054027 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. An Assessment of the Risk of Bias in Randomized Controlled Trial Reports Published in Prosthodontic and Implant Dentistry Journals. Papageorgiou SN; Kloukos D; Petridis H; Pandis N Int J Prosthodont; 2015; 28(6):586-93. PubMed ID: 26523717 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Systematic review of parameters and methods for the professional assessment of aesthetics in dental implant research. Benic GI; Wolleb K; Sancho-Puchades M; Hämmerle CH J Clin Periodontol; 2012 Feb; 39 Suppl 12():160-92. PubMed ID: 22533955 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Risk of bias versus quality assessment of randomised controlled trials: cross sectional study. Hartling L; Ospina M; Liang Y; Dryden DM; Hooton N; Krebs Seida J; Klassen TP BMJ; 2009 Oct; 339():b4012. PubMed ID: 19841007 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Bias risk assessment: (3) Revised Cochrane bias risk assessment tool for individual randomized, cross-over trials (RoB2.0)]. Wu SS; Sun F; Zhan SY Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi; 2017 Oct; 38(10):1436-1440. PubMed ID: 29060995 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Assessment of risk of bias in randomized clinical trials in surgery. Gurusamy KS; Gluud C; Nikolova D; Davidson BR Br J Surg; 2009 Apr; 96(4):342-9. PubMed ID: 19283747 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Risk on bias assessment: (2) Revised Cochrane risk of bias tool for individually randomized, parallel group trials (RoB2.0)]. Yang ZR; Sun F; Zhan SY Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi; 2017 Sep; 38(9):1285-1291. PubMed ID: 28910948 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Assessing risk of bias in randomized controlled trials of methylphenidate for children and adolescents with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Rodrigues-Tartari R; Swardfager W; Salum GA; Rohde LA; Cogo-Moreira H Int J Methods Psychiatr Res; 2018 Mar; 27(1):. PubMed ID: 28868642 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The Risk of Bias in Randomized Trials in General Dentistry Journals. Hinton S; Beyari MM; Madden K; Lamfon HA J Long Term Eff Med Implants; 2015; 25(4):277-88. PubMed ID: 26852636 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Randomized controlled trials on erectile dysfunction: quality assessment and relevant clinical impact (2007-2018). Kim KS; Chung JH; Lee SW Int J Impot Res; 2020 Mar; 32(2):213-220. PubMed ID: 31024112 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Disagreements in risk of bias assessment for randomised controlled trials included in more than one Cochrane systematic reviews: a research on research study using cross-sectional design. Bertizzolo L; Bossuyt P; Atal I; Ravaud P; Dechartres A BMJ Open; 2019 Apr; 9(4):e028382. PubMed ID: 30940766 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Practicalities of using a modified version of the Cochrane Collaboration risk of bias tool for randomised and non-randomised study designs applied in a health technology assessment setting. Robertson C; Ramsay C; Gurung T; Mowatt G; Pickard R; Sharma P; Res Synth Methods; 2014 Sep; 5(3):200-11. PubMed ID: 26052846 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Methods of quality assurance in multicenter trials in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a systematic review. Foster JD; Mackenzie H; Nelson H; Hanna GB; Francis NK Ann Surg; 2014 Aug; 260(2):220-9. PubMed ID: 24743623 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Risk of bias assessment of randomised controlled trials in high-impact ophthalmology journals and general medical journals: a systematic review. Joksimovic L; Koucheki R; Popovic M; Ahmed Y; Schlenker MB; Ahmed IIK Br J Ophthalmol; 2017 Oct; 101(10):1309-1314. PubMed ID: 28659390 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Fluorides for the prevention of early tooth decay (demineralised white lesions) during fixed brace treatment. Benson PE; Parkin N; Dyer F; Millett DT; Furness S; Germain P Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2013 Dec; (12):CD003809. PubMed ID: 24338792 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Randomized clinical trials of dental bleaching - Compliance with the CONSORT Statement: a systematic review. Loguercio AD; Maran BM; Hanzen TA; Paula AM; Perdigão J; Reis A Braz Oral Res; 2017 Aug; 31(suppl 1):e60. PubMed ID: 28902240 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. ROBINS-1: A tool for asssessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions. Hinneburg I Med Monatsschr Pharm; 2017 Apr; 40(4):175-7. PubMed ID: 29952172 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]