These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22009295)
1. Passive ammonia monitoring in the United States: comparing three different sampling devices. Puchalski MA; Sather ME; Walker JT; Lehmann CM; Gay DA; Mathew J; Robarge WP J Environ Monit; 2011 Nov; 13(11):3156-67. PubMed ID: 22009295 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of passive samplers for assessment of community exposure to toxic air contaminants and related pollutants. Mason JB; Fujita EM; Campbell DE; Zielinska B Environ Sci Technol; 2011 Mar; 45(6):2243-9. PubMed ID: 21322547 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A statistical comparison of active and passive ammonia measurements collected at Clean Air Status and Trends Network (CASTNET) sites. Puchalski MA; Rogers CM; Baumgardner R; Mishoe KP; Price G; Smith MJ; Watkins N; Lehmann CM Environ Sci Process Impacts; 2015 Feb; 17(2):358-69. PubMed ID: 25574663 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Atmospheric nitrogen inputs to the Delaware Inland Bays: the role of ammonia. Scudlark JR; Jennings JA; Roadman MJ; Savidge KB; Ullman WJ Environ Pollut; 2005 Jun; 135(3):433-43. PubMed ID: 15749541 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Reliable low-cost devices for monitoring ammonia concentrations and emissions in naturally ventilated dairy barns. Wang X; Ndegwa PM; Joo H; Neerackal GM; Harrison JH; Stöckle CO; Liu H Environ Pollut; 2016 Jan; 208(Pt B):571-9. PubMed ID: 26552517 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Field comparison of passive air samplers with reference monitors for ambient volatile organic compounds and nitrogen dioxide under week-long integrals. Mukerjee S; Oliver KD; Seila RL; Jacumin HH; Croghan C; Daughtrey EH; Neas LM; Smith LA J Environ Monit; 2009 Jan; 11(1):220-7. PubMed ID: 19137161 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessment and statistical modeling of the relationship between remotely sensed aerosol optical depth and PM2.5 in the eastern United States. Paciorek CJ; Liu Y; Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2012 May; (167):5-83; discussion 85-91. PubMed ID: 22838153 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Modelling deposition and air concentration of reduced nitrogen in Poland and sensitivity to variability in annual meteorology. Kryza M; Dore AJ; Błaś M; Sobik M J Environ Manage; 2011 Apr; 92(4):1225-36. PubMed ID: 21208722 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Testing the use of passive sampling systems for understanding air mercury concentrations and dry deposition across Florida, USA. Peterson C; Alishahi M; Gustin MS Sci Total Environ; 2012 May; 424():297-307. PubMed ID: 22444056 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Field evaluation of thermal and chemical desorption BTEX radial diffusive sampler radiello compared with active (pumped) samplers for ambient air measurements. Cocheo C; Boaretto C; Pagani D; Quaglio F; Sacco P; Zaratin L; Cottica D J Environ Monit; 2009 Feb; 11(2):297-306. PubMed ID: 19212585 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The London low emission zone baseline study. Kelly F; Armstrong B; Atkinson R; Anderson HR; Barratt B; Beevers S; Cook D; Green D; Derwent D; Mudway I; Wilkinson P; Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2011 Nov; (163):3-79. PubMed ID: 22315924 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Deposition monitoring networks: what monitoring is required to give reasonable estimates of ammonia/ammonium? Erisman JW; Hensen A; Mosquera J; Sutton M; Fowler D Environ Pollut; 2005 Jun; 135(3):419-31. PubMed ID: 15749540 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Field evaluation of nanofilm detectors for measuring acidic particles in indoor and outdoor air. Cohen BS; Heikkinen MS; Hazi Y; Gao H; Peters P; Lippmann M Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2004 Sep; (121):1-35; discussion 37-46. PubMed ID: 15553489 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Xanthoria parietina as a monitor of ground-level ambient ammonia concentrations. Olsen HB; Berthelsen K; Andersen HV; Søchting U Environ Pollut; 2010 Feb; 158(2):455-61. PubMed ID: 19781828 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A comparative study of the performance of passive samplers. Zabiegała B; Sarbu C; Urbanowicz M; Namieśnik J J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2011 Mar; 61(3):260-8. PubMed ID: 21416752 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Field comparison of passive samplers versus UV-photometric analyser to measure surface ozone in a Mediterranean area. Delgado Saborit JM; Esteve Cano VJ J Environ Monit; 2007 Jun; 9(6):610-5. PubMed ID: 17554433 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Baseline ambient gaseous ammonia concentrations in the Four Corners area and eastern Oklahoma, USA. Sather ME; Mathew J; Nguyen N; Lay J; Golod G; Vet R; Cotie J; Hertel T; Aaboe E; Callison R; Adam J; Keese D; Freise J; Hathcoat A; Sakizzie B; King M; Lee C; Oliva S; San Miguel G; Crow L; Geasland F J Environ Monit; 2008 Nov; 10(11):1319-25. PubMed ID: 18974901 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Measuring ammonia emissions from land applied manure: an intercomparison of commonly used samplers and techniques. Misselbrook TH; Nicholson FA; Chambers BJ; Johnson RA Environ Pollut; 2005 Jun; 135(3):389-97. PubMed ID: 15749537 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Measurement of personal exposure to NO2 in Sweden--evaluation of a passive sampler. Berglund M; Vahter M; Bylin G J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol; 1992; 2(3):295-307. PubMed ID: 1422160 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Atmospheric NO2 and NH3 deposition into a typical agro-ecosystem in Southeast China. Cui J; Zhou J; Yang H; Peng Y; He Y; Chan A J Environ Monit; 2011 Nov; 13(11):3216-21. PubMed ID: 21987178 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]