BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22009462)

  • 1. Written vs. spoken eyewitness accounts: does modality of testing matter?
    Sauerland M; Sporer SL
    Behav Sci Law; 2011; 29(6):846-57. PubMed ID: 22009462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Speaking is silver, writing is golden? The role of cognitive and social factors in written versus spoken witness accounts.
    Sauerland M; Krix AC; van Kan N; Glunz S; Sak A
    Mem Cognit; 2014 Aug; 42(6):978-92. PubMed ID: 24604628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A perpetrator's accent impairs witnesses' memory for physical appearance.
    Pickel KL; Staller JB
    Law Hum Behav; 2012 Apr; 36(2):140-50. PubMed ID: 22471418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Are written and spoken recall of text equivalent?
    Kellogg RT
    Am J Psychol; 2007; 120(3):415-28. PubMed ID: 17892086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. When more yields less: speaking and writing deficits in nonfluent progressive aphasia.
    Graham NL; Patterson K; Hodges JR
    Neurocase; 2004 Apr; 10(2):141-55. PubMed ID: 15788253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Does methodology matter in eyewitness identification research? The effect of live versus video exposure on eyewitness identification accuracy.
    Pozzulo JD; Crescini C; Panton T
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2008; 31(5):430-7. PubMed ID: 18790535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Spoken and written dream communication: differences and methodological aspects.
    Casagrande M; Cortini P
    Conscious Cogn; 2008 Mar; 17(1):145-58. PubMed ID: 18243735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. When a lie becomes the truth: the effects of self-generated misinformation on eyewitness memory.
    Pickel KL
    Memory; 2004 Jan; 12(1):14-26. PubMed ID: 15098618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Searching information with a natural language dialogue system: a comparison of spoken vs. written modalities.
    Le Bigot L; Jamet E; Rouet JF
    Appl Ergon; 2004 Nov; 35(6):557-64. PubMed ID: 15374763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of electrophysiological correlates of writing and speaking: a topographic ERP analysis.
    Perret C; Laganaro M
    Brain Topogr; 2012 Jan; 25(1):64-72. PubMed ID: 21863371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Remembering a criminal conversation: beyond eyewitness testimony.
    Campos L; Alonso-Quecuty ML
    Memory; 2006 Jan; 14(1):27-36. PubMed ID: 16423739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Synchronized brain activity during rehearsal and short-term memory disruption by irrelevant speech is affected by recall mode.
    Kopp F; Schröger E; Lipka S
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2006 Aug; 61(2):188-203. PubMed ID: 16298003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison between oral and written spelling in Alzheimer's disease.
    Croisile B; Brabant MJ; Carmoi T; Lepage Y; Aimard G; Trillet M
    Brain Lang; 1996 Sep; 54(3):361-87. PubMed ID: 8866054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Memory for a staged criminal event witnessed live and on video.
    Ihlebaek C; Løve T; Eilertsen DE; Magnussen S
    Memory; 2003 May; 11(3):319-27. PubMed ID: 12908679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparison between written and spoken narratives in aphasia.
    Behrns I; Wengelin A; Broberg M; Hartelius L
    Clin Linguist Phon; 2009 Jul; 23(7):507-28. PubMed ID: 19585311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A systematic investigation of same and cross modality priming using written and spoken responses.
    Loveman E; Van Hooff JC; Gale A
    Memory; 2002 Jul; 10(4):267-76. PubMed ID: 12097211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The man behind the mask: accuracy and predictors of eyewitness offender descriptions.
    Fahsing IA; Ask K; Granhag PA
    J Appl Psychol; 2004 Aug; 89(4):722-9. PubMed ID: 15327357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sequential lineup laps and eyewitness accuracy.
    Steblay NK; Dietrich HL; Ryan SL; Raczynski JL; James KA
    Law Hum Behav; 2011 Aug; 35(4):262-74. PubMed ID: 20632113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Identification accuracy for single- and double-perpetrator crimes: does accomplice gender matter?
    Megreya AM; Bindemann M
    Br J Psychol; 2012 Nov; 103(4):439-53. PubMed ID: 23034106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effects of confederate influence and confidence on the accuracy of crime judgements.
    Ost J; Ghonouie H; Cook L; Vrij A
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 May; 128(1):25-32. PubMed ID: 17976500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.