BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

361 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2200957)

  • 21. Comparison of target organs of carcinogenicity for mutagenic and non-mutagenic chemicals.
    Gold LS; Slone TH; Stern BR; Bernstein L
    Mutat Res; 1993 Mar; 286(1):75-100. PubMed ID: 7678909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Identification of specific mRNA signatures as fingerprints for carcinogenesis in mice induced by genotoxic and nongenotoxic hepatocarcinogens.
    Kossler N; Matheis KA; Ostenfeldt N; Bach Toft D; Dhalluin S; Deschl U; Kalkuhl A
    Toxicol Sci; 2015 Feb; 143(2):277-95. PubMed ID: 25410580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Neonatal mouse model: review of methods and results.
    McClain RM; Keller D; Casciano D; Fu P; MacDonald J; Popp J; Sagartz J
    Toxicol Pathol; 2001; 29 Suppl():128-37. PubMed ID: 11695548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. International Commission for Protection against Environmental Mutagens and Carcinogens. ICPEMC working paper No. 5. Genotoxicity tests as predictors of carcinogens: an analysis.
    Douglas GR; Blakey DH; Clayson DB
    Mutat Res; 1988 Jul; 196(1):83-93. PubMed ID: 3292901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A novel, integrated in vitro carcinogenicity test to identify genotoxic and non-genotoxic carcinogens using human lymphoblastoid cells.
    Wilde EC; Chapman KE; Stannard LM; Seager AL; Brüsehafer K; Shah UK; Tonkin JA; Brown MR; Verma JR; Doherty AT; Johnson GE; Doak SH; Jenkins GJS
    Arch Toxicol; 2018 Feb; 92(2):935-951. PubMed ID: 29110037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Integrated approach to testing and assessment for predicting rodent genotoxic carcinogenicity.
    Petkov PI; Schultz TW; Donner EM; Honma M; Morita T; Hamada S; Wakata A; Mishima M; Maniwa J; Todorov M; Kaloyanova E; Kotov S; Mekenyan OG
    J Appl Toxicol; 2016 Dec; 36(12):1536-1550. PubMed ID: 27225589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Genotoxicity and carcinogenicity studies of analgesics, anti-inflammatory drugs and antipyretics.
    Brambilla G; Martelli A
    Pharmacol Res; 2009 Jul; 60(1):1-17. PubMed ID: 19427580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. An integrated in vitro carcinogenicity test that distinguishes between genotoxic carcinogens, non-genotoxic carcinogens, and non-carcinogens.
    Chapman KE; Shah UK; Fletcher JF; Johnson GE; Doak SH; Jenkins GJS
    Mutagenesis; 2024 Mar; 39(2):69-77. PubMed ID: 38301659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Comparison of the expression profiles induced by genotoxic and nongenotoxic carcinogens in rat liver.
    Ellinger-Ziegelbauer H; Stuart B; Wahle B; Bomann W; Ahr HJ
    Mutat Res; 2005 Aug; 575(1-2):61-84. PubMed ID: 15890375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Aspects of database construction and interrogation of relevance to the accurate prediction of rodent carcinogenicity and mutagenicity.
    Ashby J
    Environ Health Perspect; 1991 Dec; 96():97-100. PubMed ID: 1820286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Hydroquinone: an evaluation of the human risks from its carcinogenic and mutagenic properties.
    McGregor D
    Crit Rev Toxicol; 2007; 37(10):887-914. PubMed ID: 18027166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Salmonella mutagenicity and rodent carcinogenicity: quantitative structure-activity relationships.
    Blake BW; Enslein K; Gombar VK; Borgstedt HH
    Mutat Res; 1990 Jul; 241(3):261-71. PubMed ID: 2195334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Challenging dogma: thresholds for genotoxic carcinogens? The case of vinyl acetate.
    Hengstler JG; Bogdanffy MS; Bolt HM; Oesch F
    Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol; 2003; 43():485-520. PubMed ID: 12415124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Mutagens that are not carcinogens: faulty theory or faulty tests?
    Zeiger E
    Mutat Res; 2001 May; 492(1-2):29-38. PubMed ID: 11377241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A classification framework and practical guidance for establishing a mode of action for chemical carcinogens.
    Butterworth BE
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2006 Jun; 45(1):9-23. PubMed ID: 16530901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Evaluation of the ability of a battery of three in vitro genotoxicity tests to discriminate rodent carcinogens and non-carcinogens II. Further analysis of mammalian cell results, relative predictivity and tumour profiles.
    Kirkland D; Aardema M; Müller L; Makoto H
    Mutat Res; 2006 Sep; 608(1):29-42. PubMed ID: 16769241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. NTP technical report on the toxicology and carcinogenesis studies of 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) (CAS No. 1746-01-6) in female Harlan Sprague-Dawley rats (Gavage Studies).
    National Toxicology Program
    Natl Toxicol Program Tech Rep Ser; 2006 Apr; (521):4-232. PubMed ID: 16835633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Series: current issues in mutagenesis and carcinogenesis, No. 65. The genotoxicity and carcinogenicity of paracetamol: a regulatory (re)view.
    Bergman K; Müller L; Teigen SW
    Mutat Res; 1996 Feb; 349(2):263-88. PubMed ID: 8600357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Nongenotoxic (epigenetic) carcinogens: pesticides as an example. A critical review.
    Rakitsky VN; Koblyakov VA; Turusov VS
    Teratog Carcinog Mutagen; 2000; 20(4):229-40. PubMed ID: 10910473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The alkaline single cell gel electrophoresis assay with mouse multiple organs: results with 30 aromatic amines evaluated by the IARC and U.S. NTP.
    Sasaki YF; Fujikawa K; Ishida K; Kawamura N; Nishikawa Y; Ohta S; Satoh M; Madarame H; Ueno S; Susa N; Matsusaka N; Tsuda S
    Mutat Res; 1999 Mar; 440(1):1-18. PubMed ID: 10095124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.