These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22009681)

  • 1. Optimized detection of transcription factor-binding sites in ChIP-seq experiments.
    Elo LL; Kallio A; Laajala TD; Hawkins RD; Korpelainen E; Aittokallio T
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2012 Jan; 40(1):e1. PubMed ID: 22009681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Optimizing detection of transcription factor-binding sites in ChIP-seq experiments.
    Kallio A; Elo LL
    Methods Mol Biol; 2013; 1038():181-91. PubMed ID: 23872976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. HiChIP: a high-throughput pipeline for integrative analysis of ChIP-Seq data.
    Yan H; Evans J; Kalmbach M; Moore R; Middha S; Luban S; Wang L; Bhagwate A; Li Y; Sun Z; Chen X; Kocher JP
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2014 Aug; 15(1):280. PubMed ID: 25128017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. ChIPseeker: an R/Bioconductor package for ChIP peak annotation, comparison and visualization.
    Yu G; Wang LG; He QY
    Bioinformatics; 2015 Jul; 31(14):2382-3. PubMed ID: 25765347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. annoPeak: a web application to annotate and visualize peaks from ChIP-seq/ChIP-exo-seq.
    Tang X; Srivastava A; Liu H; Machiraju R; Huang K; Leone G
    Bioinformatics; 2017 May; 33(10):1570-1571. PubMed ID: 28169395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A novel statistical method for quantitative comparison of multiple ChIP-seq datasets.
    Chen L; Wang C; Qin ZS; Wu H
    Bioinformatics; 2015 Jun; 31(12):1889-96. PubMed ID: 25682068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Ritornello: high fidelity control-free chromatin immunoprecipitation peak calling.
    Stanton KP; Jin J; Lederman RR; Weissman SM; Kluger Y
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2017 Dec; 45(21):e173. PubMed ID: 28981893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Software for rapid time dependent ChIP-sequencing analysis (TDCA).
    Myschyshyn M; Farren-Dai M; Chuang TJ; Vocadlo D
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2017 Nov; 18(1):521. PubMed ID: 29178831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sensitive and robust assessment of ChIP-seq read distribution using a strand-shift profile.
    Nakato R; Shirahige K
    Bioinformatics; 2018 Jul; 34(14):2356-2363. PubMed ID: 29528371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Using combined evidence from replicates to evaluate ChIP-seq peaks.
    Jalili V; Matteucci M; Masseroli M; Morelli MJ
    Bioinformatics; 2015 Sep; 31(17):2761-9. PubMed ID: 25957351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. ChIPulate: A comprehensive ChIP-seq simulation pipeline.
    Datta V; Hannenhalli S; Siddharthan R
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2019 Mar; 15(3):e1006921. PubMed ID: 30897079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A practical comparison of methods for detecting transcription factor binding sites in ChIP-seq experiments.
    Laajala TD; Raghav S; Tuomela S; Lahesmaa R; Aittokallio T; Elo LL
    BMC Genomics; 2009 Dec; 10():618. PubMed ID: 20017957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. PRI-CAT: a web-tool for the analysis, storage and visualization of plant ChIP-seq experiments.
    Muiño JM; Hoogstraat M; van Ham RC; van Dijk AD
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2011 Jul; 39(Web Server issue):W524-7. PubMed ID: 21609962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. From binding motifs in ChIP-Seq data to improved models of transcription factor binding sites.
    Kulakovskiy I; Levitsky V; Oshchepkov D; Bryzgalov L; Vorontsov I; Makeev V
    J Bioinform Comput Biol; 2013 Feb; 11(1):1340004. PubMed ID: 23427986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Inferring direct DNA binding from ChIP-seq.
    Bailey TL; Machanick P
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2012 Sep; 40(17):e128. PubMed ID: 22610855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cell-type specificity of ChIP-predicted transcription factor binding sites.
    Håndstad T; Rye M; Močnik R; Drabløs F; Sætrom P
    BMC Genomics; 2012 Aug; 13():372. PubMed ID: 22863112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Role of ChIP-seq in the discovery of transcription factor binding sites, differential gene regulation mechanism, epigenetic marks and beyond.
    Mundade R; Ozer HG; Wei H; Prabhu L; Lu T
    Cell Cycle; 2014; 13(18):2847-52. PubMed ID: 25486472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Is this the right normalization? A diagnostic tool for ChIP-seq normalization.
    Angelini C; Heller R; Volkinshtein R; Yekutieli D
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2015 May; 16():150. PubMed ID: 25957089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Triform algorithm: improved sensitivity and specificity in ChIP-Seq peak finding.
    Kornacker K; Rye MB; Håndstad T; Drabløs F
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2012 Jul; 13():176. PubMed ID: 22827163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. BinDNase: a discriminatory approach for transcription factor binding prediction using DNase I hypersensitivity data.
    Kähärä J; Lähdesmäki H
    Bioinformatics; 2015 Sep; 31(17):2852-9. PubMed ID: 25957350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.