364 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22009918)
1. Measurement of hearing protection devices performance in the workplace during full-shift working operations.
Nélisse H; Gaudreau MA; Boutin J; Voix J; Laville F
Ann Occup Hyg; 2012 Mar; 56(2):221-32. PubMed ID: 22009918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Development and validation of a field microphone-in-real-ear approach for measuring hearing protector attenuation.
Berger EH; Voix J; Kieper RW; Le Cocq C
Noise Health; 2011; 13(51):163-75. PubMed ID: 21368442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Variability of real-world hearing protector attenuation measurements.
Neitzel R; Somers S; Seixas N
Ann Occup Hyg; 2006 Oct; 50(7):679-91. PubMed ID: 16782739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Symphony orchestra musicians' use of hearing protection and attenuation of custom-made hearing protectors as measured with two different real-ear attenuation at threshold methods.
Huttunen KH; Sivonen VP; Poykko VT
Noise Health; 2011; 13(51):176-88. PubMed ID: 21368443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Consistency of attenuation across multiple fittings of custom and non-custom earplugs.
Tufts JB; Jahn KN; Byram JP
Ann Occup Hyg; 2013 Jun; 57(5):571-80. PubMed ID: 23267007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Speech intelligibility and passive, level-dependent earplugs.
Norin JA; Emanuel DC; Letowski TR
Ear Hear; 2011; 32(5):642-9. PubMed ID: 21407078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [The role of information and training for workers on the correct use of earplugs in assessing real noise attenuation with E-A-RfitTM system].
Cassano F; Aloise I; Labianca G; Gaccione V; Mazzotta C; Cardascia F; Garavaglia M; Germano C; Dentamaro A; Di Lorenzo L
Med Lav; 2015 Jul; 106(4):284-93. PubMed ID: 26154471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Measurement of real personal noise attenuation using earplugs with the E-A-Rfit system].
Cassano F; Aloise I; Labianca G; Gaccione V; Mazzotta C; Cardascia F; Garavaglia M; Scarselletta RS; Di Lorenzo L
Med Lav; 2013; 104(3):213-23. PubMed ID: 23879065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Relationship between comfort and attenuation measurements for two types of earplugs.
Byrne DC; Davis RR; Shaw PB; Specht BM; Holland AN
Noise Health; 2011; 13(51):86-92. PubMed ID: 21368433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Hearing protection field attenuation estimation systems and associated training for reducing workers' exposure to noise.
Morata TC; Gong W; Tikka C; Samelli AG; Verbeek JH
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2024 May; 5(5):CD015066. PubMed ID: 38757544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The effectiveness of hearing protectors in practice.
Alberti PW; Riko K; Abel SM; Kristensen R
J Otolaryngol; 1979 Aug; 8(4):354-9. PubMed ID: 513182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Hearing protection use in manufacturing workers: a qualitative study.
Reddy RK; Welch D; Thorne P; Ameratunga S
Noise Health; 2012; 14(59):202-9. PubMed ID: 22918151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A study of the real-world noise attenuation of the current hearing protection devices in typical workplaces using Field Microphone in Real Ear method.
Aliabadi M; Biabani A; Golmohammadi R; Farhadian M
Work; 2018; 60(2):271-279. PubMed ID: 29865097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation by industrial workers of passive and level-dependent hearing protection devices.
Tufts JB; Hamilton MA; Ucci AJ; Rubas J
Noise Health; 2011; 13(50):26-36. PubMed ID: 21173484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A controlled investigation of in-field attenuation performance of selected insert, earmuff, and canal cap hearing protectors.
Park MY; Casali JG
Hum Factors; 1991 Dec; 33(6):693-714. PubMed ID: 1800294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The effectiveness of hearing protection among construction workers.
Neitzel R; Seixas N
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2005 Apr; 2(4):227-38. PubMed ID: 15788384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Attenuating properties of hearing protectors in versus time factor.
Kotarbińska E
Int J Occup Med Environ Health; 2003; 16(1):67-72. PubMed ID: 12705720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of the hearing protector in a real work situation using the field-microphone-in-real-ear method.
Rocha CH; Longo IA; Moreira RR; Samelli AG
Codas; 2016 Apr; 28(2):99-105. PubMed ID: 27191871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Systematic Evaluation of the Relationship between Physical and Psychoacoustical Measurements of Hearing Protectors' Attenuation.
Nélisse H; Le Cocq C; Boutin J; Laville F; Voix J
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2015; 12(12):829-44. PubMed ID: 26023884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Group mean hearing threshold changes in a noise-exposed industrial population using personal hearing protectors.
Savell JF; Toothman EH
Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1987 Jan; 48(1):23-7. PubMed ID: 3565259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
