These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

683 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22010079)

  • 21. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of vertical and angular misfit in implant-supported fixed prostheses.
    Assunção WG; Gomes EA; Rocha EP; Delben JA
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(4):788-96. PubMed ID: 21841989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Telescopic magnetic attachment for implant-supported denture: evaluation of splint effect.
    Chen J; Tomotake Y; Watanabe M; Ishida Y; Nagao K; Ichikawa T
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(3):657-64. PubMed ID: 21691614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Stress Analysis of Axial and Tilted Implants in Full-arch Fixed Dentures Under Different Abutment Conditions.
    Mazaro JV; da Silva CR; Filho HG; Zavanelli AC; de Mello CC; Lemos CA; Pellizzer EP
    J Craniofac Surg; 2016 May; 27(3):e249-52. PubMed ID: 26999691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Five-year results of fixed implant-supported rehabilitations with distal cantilevers for the edentulous mandible.
    Gallucci GO; Doughtie CB; Hwang JW; Fiorellini JP; Weber HP
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Jun; 20(6):601-7. PubMed ID: 19302389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Cortical bone stress distribution in mandibles with different configurations restored with prefabricated bar-prosthesis protocol: a three-dimensional finite-element analysis.
    de Almeida EO; Rocha EP; Assunção WG; Júnior AC; Anchieta RB
    J Prosthodont; 2011 Jan; 20(1):29-34. PubMed ID: 21087340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Influence of restoration type on stress distribution in bone around implants: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Stegaroiu R; Sato T; Kusakari H; Miyakawa O
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1998; 13(1):82-90. PubMed ID: 9509784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Finite element analysis of effect of prosthesis height, angle of force application, and implant offset on supporting bone.
    Sütpideler M; Eckert SE; Zobitz M; An KN
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(6):819-25. PubMed ID: 15623056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Biomechanical comparison of straight and staggered implant placement configurations.
    Itoh H; Caputo AA; Kuroe T; Nakahara H
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2004 Feb; 24(1):47-55. PubMed ID: 14984145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Effects of splinted prosthesis supported a wide implant or two implants: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Huang HL; Huang JS; Ko CC; Hsu JT; Chang CH; Chen MY
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2005 Aug; 16(4):466-72. PubMed ID: 16117772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Effect of abutment's height and framework alloy on the load distribution of mandibular cantilevered implant-supported prosthesis.
    Suedam V; Souza EA; Moura MS; Jacques LB; Rubo JH
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Feb; 20(2):196-200. PubMed ID: 19191796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Photoelastic stress analysis of implant-tooth connected prostheses with segmented and nonsegmented abutments.
    Ochiai KT; Ozawa S; Caputo AA; Nishimura RD
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 May; 89(5):495-502. PubMed ID: 12806328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The effect of provisional restoration type on micromovement of implants.
    Holst S; Geiselhoeringer H; Wichmann M; Holst AI
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Sep; 100(3):173-82. PubMed ID: 18762029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Biomechanical analysis of stress around the tilted implants with different cantilever lengths in all-on-4 concept.
    Wang Q; Zhang ZZ; Bai SZ; Zhang SF
    BMC Oral Health; 2022 Nov; 22(1):469. PubMed ID: 36335327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The staggered installation of dental implants and its effect on bone stresses.
    Abu-Hammad O; Khraisat A; Dar-Odeh N; Jagger DC; Hammerle CH
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2007 Sep; 9(3):121-7. PubMed ID: 17716255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of different implant configurations for a mandibular fixed prosthesis.
    Fazi G; Tellini S; Vangi D; Branchi R
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(4):752-9. PubMed ID: 21841984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of load transmission using different implant inclinations and cantilever lengths.
    Bevilacqua M; Tealdo T; Pera F; Menini M; Mossolov A; Drago C; Pera P
    Int J Prosthodont; 2008; 21(6):539-42. PubMed ID: 19149073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Effect of the number of supporting implants on mandibular photoelastic models with different implant-retained overdenture designs.
    Celik G; Uludag B
    J Prosthodont; 2014 Jul; 23(5):374-80. PubMed ID: 24417330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Effect of dislodging forces on mandibular implant attachment-retained overdenture.
    Elkerdawy MW; Radi IA
    Implant Dent; 2011 Jun; 20(3):246-54. PubMed ID: 21613951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Stress transfer of four mandibular implant overdenture cantilever designs.
    Sadowsky SJ; Caputo AA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2004 Oct; 92(4):328-36. PubMed ID: 15507904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Photoelastic analysis of the effect of palatal support on various implant-supported overdenture designs.
    Ochiai KT; Williams BH; Hojo S; Nishimura R; Caputo AA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2004 May; 91(5):421-7. PubMed ID: 15153848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 35.