380 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22010085)
1. The effect of different screw-tightening techniques on the strain generated on an internal-connection implant superstructure. Part 2: Models created with a splinted impression technique.
Choi JH
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(5):1016-23. PubMed ID: 22010085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The effect of different screw-tightening techniques on the stress generated on an internal-connection implant superstructure.
Choi JH; Lim YJ; Kim CW; Kim MJ
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(6):1045-53. PubMed ID: 20162108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Stress levels for well-fitting implant superstructures as a function of tightening force levels, tightening sequence, and different operators.
Nissan J; Gross M; Shifman A; Assif D
J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Jul; 86(1):20-3. PubMed ID: 11458260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of the accuracy of implant-level impression techniques for internal-connection implant prostheses in parallel and divergent models.
Choi JH; Lim YJ; Yim SH; Kim CW
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(5):761-8. PubMed ID: 17974110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Impression techniques and misfit-induced strains on implant-supported superstructures: an in vitro study.
Cehreli MC; Akça K
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2006 Aug; 26(4):379-85. PubMed ID: 16939020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Accuracy of impression techniques for an implant-supported prosthesis.
Del'Acqua MA; Chávez AM; Compagnoni MA; Molo Fde A
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(4):715-21. PubMed ID: 20657866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Accuracy of different impression techniques for internal-connection implants.
Lee YJ; Heo SJ; Koak JY; Kim SK
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(5):823-30. PubMed ID: 19865622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of splinting in accuracy of two implant impression techniques.
de Avila ED; de Matos Moraes F; Castanharo SM; Del'Acqua MA; de Assis Mollo F
J Oral Implantol; 2014 Dec; 40(6):633-9. PubMed ID: 25506658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. An in vitro comparison of the accuracy of implant impressions with coded healing abutments and different implant angulations.
Al-Abdullah K; Zandparsa R; Finkelman M; Hirayama H
J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Aug; 110(2):90-100. PubMed ID: 23929370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of impression techniques and materials for an implant-supported prosthesis.
Del'Acqua MA; Chávez AM; Amaral AL; Compagnoni MA; Mollo Fde A
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(4):771-6. PubMed ID: 20657873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The influence of tightening sequence and method on screw preload in implant superstructures.
Al-Sahan MM; Al Maflehi NS; Akeel RF
Int J Prosthodont; 2014; 27(1):76-9. PubMed ID: 24392482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Axial displacements in external and internal implant-abutment connection.
Lee JH; Kim DG; Park CJ; Cho LR
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Feb; 25(2):e83-9. PubMed ID: 23088616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of the accuracy of plastic and metal stock trays for implant impressions.
Del'acqua MA; de Avila ÉD; Amaral ÂL; Pinelli LA; de Assis Mollo F
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(3):544-50. PubMed ID: 22616047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Analysis of stress distribution in a screw-retained implant prosthesis.
Watanabe F; Uno I; Hata Y; Neuendorff G; Kirsch A
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2000; 15(2):209-18. PubMed ID: 10795453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Preloads generated with repeated tightening in three types of screws used in dental implant assemblies.
Byrne D; Jacobs S; O'Connell B; Houston F; Claffey N
J Prosthodont; 2006; 15(3):164-71. PubMed ID: 16681498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Fit of implant-supported fixed prostheses fabricated on master casts made from a dental stone and a dental plaster.
Wise M
J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Nov; 86(5):532-8. PubMed ID: 11725282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of splinted and nonsplinted impression techniques on the accuracy of fit of fixed implant prostheses in edentulous patients: a comparative study.
Papaspyridakos P; Lal K; White GS; Weber HP; Gallucci GO
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(6):1267-72. PubMed ID: 22167432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The dynamic natures of implant loading.
Wang RF; Kang B; Lang LA; Razzoog ME
J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Jun; 101(6):359-71. PubMed ID: 19463663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Accuracy of impressions for internal-connection implant prostheses with various divergent angles.
Jang HK; Kim S; Shim JS; Lee KW; Moon HS
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(5):1011-5. PubMed ID: 22010084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A comparative study of the accuracy between plastic and metal impression transfer copings for implant restorations.
Fernandez MA; Paez de Mendoza CY; Platt JA; Levon JA; Hovijitra ST; Nimmo A
J Prosthodont; 2013 Jul; 22(5):367-76. PubMed ID: 23387412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
