214 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22010086)
1. Publication bias in five dental implant journals: an observation from 2005 to 2009.
Yuan JC; Shyamsunder N; Barao VA; Lee DJ; Sukotjo C
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(5):1024-32. PubMed ID: 22010086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Trends in funding, internationalization, and types of study for original articles published in five implant-related journals between 2005 and 2009.
Barão VA; Shyamsunder N; Yuan JC; Knoernschild KL; Assunção WG; Sukotjo C
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(1):69-76. PubMed ID: 22299081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Association of industry sponsorship to published outcomes in gastrointestinal clinical research.
Brown A; Kraft D; Schmitz SM; Sharpless V; Martin C; Shah R; Shaheen NJ
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2006 Dec; 4(12):1445-51. PubMed ID: 17101295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Publication bias in the anesthesiology literature.
De Oliveira GS; Chang R; Kendall MC; Fitzgerald PC; McCarthy RJ
Anesth Analg; 2012 May; 114(5):1042-8. PubMed ID: 22344237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The roles of funding source, clinical trial outcome, and quality of reporting in orthopedic surgery literature.
Khan SN; Mermer MJ; Myers E; Sandhu HS
Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ); 2008 Dec; 37(12):E205-12; discussion E212. PubMed ID: 19212579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Association between funding source and study outcome in orthopaedic research.
Leopold SS; Warme WJ; Fritz Braunlich E; Shott S
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2003 Oct; (415):293-301. PubMed ID: 14612659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The value of lesser-impact-factor surgical journals as a source of negative and inconclusive outcomes reporting.
Kanaan Z; Galandiuk S; Abby M; Shannon KV; Dajani D; Hicks N; Rai SN
Ann Surg; 2011 Mar; 253(3):619-23. PubMed ID: 21270633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Industry sponsorship and authorship of clinical trials over 20 years.
Buchkowsky SS; Jewesson PJ
Ann Pharmacother; 2004 Apr; 38(4):579-85. PubMed ID: 14982982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Growing body of evidence on survival rates of implant-supported fixed prostheses.
Abt E
Evid Based Dent; 2008; 9(2):51-2. PubMed ID: 18584006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Research in prosthodontics: a 10-year observation of trends in topics, collaboration, and funding.
Lee DJ; Yuan JC; Knoernschild KL; Campbell SD; Sukotjo C
Int J Prosthodont; 2011; 24(5):473-8. PubMed ID: 21909491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Discrepancy between results and abstract conclusions in industry- vs nonindustry-funded studies comparing topical prostaglandins.
Alasbali T; Smith M; Geffen N; Trope GE; Flanagan JG; Jin Y; Buys YM
Am J Ophthalmol; 2009 Jan; 147(1):33-38.e2. PubMed ID: 18760766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Reporting of statistical results in prosthodontic and implantology journals: p values or confidence intervals?
Kloukos D; Papageorgiou SN; Fleming PS; Petridis H; Pandis N
Int J Prosthodont; 2014; 27(5):427-32. PubMed ID: 25191884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Publication bias in oral and maxillofacial surgery journals: an observation on published controlled trials.
Pitak-Arnnop P; Sader R; Rapidis AD; Dhanuthai K; Bauer U; Herve C; Hemprich A
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2010 Jan; 38(1):4-10. PubMed ID: 19896857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Funding and publishing trends of original research by emergency medicine investigators over the past decade.
Birkhahn RH; Van Deusen SK; Okpara OI; Datillo PA; Briggs WM; Gaeta TJ
Acad Emerg Med; 2006 Jan; 13(1):95-101. PubMed ID: 16365335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Frequency, nature, effects, and correlates of conflicts of interest in published clinical cancer research.
Jagsi R; Sheets N; Jankovic A; Motomura AR; Amarnath S; Ubel PA
Cancer; 2009 Jun; 115(12):2783-91. PubMed ID: 19434666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The evidence base for oral and maxillofacial surgery: 10-year analysis of two journals.
Sandhu A
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Jan; 50(1):45-8. PubMed ID: 21156332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Commercially funded and United States-based research is more likely to be published; good-quality studies with negative outcomes are not.
Lynch JR; Cunningham MR; Warme WJ; Schaad DC; Wolf FM; Leopold SS
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2007 May; 89(5):1010-8. PubMed ID: 17473138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Negative results and impact factor: a lesson from neonatology.
Littner Y; Mimouni FB; Dollberg S; Mandel D
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med; 2005 Nov; 159(11):1036-7. PubMed ID: 16275793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Is research presented at the scoliosis research society annual meeting influenced by industry funding?
Roach JW; Skaggs DL; Sponseller PD; Macleod LM
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Sep; 33(20):2208-12. PubMed ID: 18725871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Do financial factors such as author page charges and industry funding impact on the nature of published research in infectious diseases?
Liyanage SS; Raina Macintyre C
Health Info Libr J; 2006 Sep; 23(3):214-22. PubMed ID: 16911128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
