These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22010744)

  • 1. Dynamic response of intraocular pressure and biomechanical effects of the eye considering fluid-structure interaction.
    Salimi S; Park SS; Freiheit T
    J Biomech Eng; 2011 Sep; 133(9):091009. PubMed ID: 22010744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A fluid-structure interaction problem in biomechanics: prestressed vibrations of the eye by the finite element method.
    Coquart L; Depeursinge C; Curnier A; Ohayon R
    J Biomech; 1992 Oct; 25(10):1105-18. PubMed ID: 1400511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Corneal biomechanics measured with the ocular response analyser in patients with unilateral open-angle glaucoma.
    Hirneiss C; Neubauer AS; Yu A; Kampik A; Kernt M
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2011 Mar; 89(2):e189-92. PubMed ID: 21288308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Study on establishment and mechanics application of finite element model of bovine eye.
    Cui YH; Huang JF; Cheng SY; Wei W; Shang L; Li N; Xiong K
    BMC Ophthalmol; 2015 Aug; 15():101. PubMed ID: 26268321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Noninvasive measurement of wave speed of porcine cornea in ex vivo porcine eyes for various intraocular pressures.
    Zhou B; Sit AJ; Zhang X
    Ultrasonics; 2017 Nov; 81():86-92. PubMed ID: 28618301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of corneal thickness, corneal curvature, and intraocular pressure level on Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry.
    Francis BA; Hsieh A; Lai MY; Chopra V; Pena F; Azen S; Varma R;
    Ophthalmology; 2007 Jan; 114(1):20-6. PubMed ID: 17070592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Relationship between corneal biomechanical properties, central corneal thickness, and intraocular pressure across the spectrum of glaucoma.
    Kaushik S; Pandav SS; Banger A; Aggarwal K; Gupta A
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2012 May; 153(5):840-849.e2. PubMed ID: 22310080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Role of corneal biomechanical properties in applanation tonometry measurements.
    Kwon TH; Ghaboussi J; Pecknold DA; Hashash Y
    J Refract Surg; 2010 Jul; 26(7):512-9. PubMed ID: 19715267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [How does central cornea thickness influence intraocular pressure during applanation and contour tonometry?].
    Schwenteck T; Knappe M; Moros I
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2012 Sep; 229(9):917-27. PubMed ID: 22972357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Intraocular pressure: Goldmann tonometry, computational model, and calibration equation.
    Guzmán AF; Castilla AA; Guarnieri FA; Rodríguez FR
    J Glaucoma; 2013 Jan; 22(1):10-4. PubMed ID: 21946545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Elastic hysteresis in human eyes is an age-dependent value.
    Ishii K; Saito K; Kameda T; Oshika T
    Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2013; 41(1):6-11. PubMed ID: 23350804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A detailed methodology to model the Non Contact Tonometry: a Fluid Structure Interaction study.
    Redaelli E; Grasa J; Calvo B; Rodriguez Matas JF; Luraghi G
    Front Bioeng Biotechnol; 2022; 10():981665. PubMed ID: 36267451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Applanation tonometry in "normal" patients and patients after LASIK].
    Kohlhaas M; Spörl E; Böhm AG; Pollack K; Sandner D; Pillunat LE
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2005 Oct; 222(10):823-6. PubMed ID: 16240277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Relationship between Corvis ST Tonometry Measured Corneal Parameters and Intraocular Pressure, Corneal Thickness and Corneal Curvature.
    Asaoka R; Nakakura S; Tabuchi H; Murata H; Nakao Y; Ihara N; Rimayanti U; Aihara M; Kiuchi Y
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(10):e0140385. PubMed ID: 26485129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of Goldmann applanation tonometry using a nonlinear finite element ocular model.
    Elsheikh A; Wang D; Kotecha A; Brown M; Garway-Heath D
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2006 Oct; 34(10):1628-40. PubMed ID: 17006754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Resonance frequency of fluid-filled and prestressed spherical shell-A model of the human eyeball.
    Shih PJ; Guo YR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Apr; 139(4):1784. PubMed ID: 27106326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Influence of corneal parameters in keratoconus on IOP readings obtained with different tonometers.
    Firat PG; Orman G; Doganay S; Demirel S
    Clin Exp Optom; 2013 Mar; 96(2):233-7. PubMed ID: 23320621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Correlation study of biomechanical changes between diabetic eye disease and glaucoma using finite element model of human eye with different iris-lens channel distances.
    Yan Y; Shi H; Zhao Y; Cao Y; Xie Z
    Med Eng Phys; 2022 Nov; 109():103910. PubMed ID: 36371087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Intraocular pressure difference in Goldmann applanation tonometry versus Perkins hand-held applanation tonometry in overweight patients.
    dos Santos MG; Makk S; Berghold A; Eckhardt M; Haas A
    Ophthalmology; 1998 Dec; 105(12):2260-3. PubMed ID: 9855157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Clinical comparison of pascal dynamic contour tonometry and goldmann applanation tonometry in asymmetric open-angle glaucoma.
    Sullivan-Mee M; Halverson KD; Qualls C
    J Glaucoma; 2007 Dec; 16(8):694-9. PubMed ID: 18091457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.