These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22010896)

  • 21. Reorienting when cues conflict: evidence for an adaptive-combination view.
    Ratliff KR; Newcombe NS
    Psychol Sci; 2008 Dec; 19(12):1301-7. PubMed ID: 19121141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Sex differences in directional cue use in a virtual landscape.
    Chai XJ; Jacobs LF
    Behav Neurosci; 2009 Apr; 123(2):276-83. PubMed ID: 19331451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Sex differences in spatial ability: a lateralization of function approach.
    Rilea SL; Roskos-Ewoldsen B; Boles D
    Brain Cogn; 2004 Dec; 56(3):332-43. PubMed ID: 15522772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The potentiation of geometry by features in human children: Evidence against modularity in the domain of navigation.
    Lourenco SF; Cabrera J
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2015 Dec; 140():184-96. PubMed ID: 26254274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Neither by global nor local cues alone: evidence for a unified orientation process.
    Bodily KD; Eastman CK; Sturz BR
    Anim Cogn; 2011 Sep; 14(5):665-74. PubMed ID: 21509592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Pigeons encode relative geometry.
    Kelly DM; Spetch ML
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2001 Oct; 27(4):417-22. PubMed ID: 11676090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Sex differences in human virtual water maze performance: novel measures reveal the relative contribution of directional responding and spatial knowledge.
    Woolley DG; Vermaercke B; Op de Beeck H; Wagemans J; Gantois I; D'Hooge R; Swinnen SP; Wenderoth N
    Behav Brain Res; 2010 Apr; 208(2):408-14. PubMed ID: 20035800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. What's in a cue? The role of cue orientation in object displacement tasks.
    Mangalindan DM; Schmuckler MA
    Infant Behav Dev; 2011 Jun; 34(3):407-16. PubMed ID: 21481942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Is there a geometric module for spatial orientation? Insights from a rodent navigation model.
    Sheynikhovich D; Chavarriaga R; Strösslin T; Arleo A; Gerstner W
    Psychol Rev; 2009 Jul; 116(3):540-66. PubMed ID: 19618986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Encoding geometric and non-geometric information: a study with evolved agents.
    Ponticorvo M; Miglino O
    Anim Cogn; 2010 Jan; 13(1):157-74. PubMed ID: 19582489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Children's use of geometry for reorientation.
    Lee SA; Spelke ES
    Dev Sci; 2008 Sep; 11(5):743-9. PubMed ID: 18801130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Sex differences in a landmark environmental re-orientation task only during the learning phase.
    Piccardi L; Bianchini F; Iasevoli L; Giannone G; Guariglia C
    Neurosci Lett; 2011 Oct; 503(3):181-5. PubMed ID: 21889578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Effect of reference frames and number of cues available on the spatial orientation of males and females in a virtual memory task.
    Cánovas R; García RF; Cimadevilla JM
    Behav Brain Res; 2011 Jan; 216(1):116-21. PubMed ID: 20655953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Spatial integration in human geometry learning.
    Prados J; Alvarez B; Reynolds G
    Behav Brain Res; 2011 Oct; 224(2):297-304. PubMed ID: 21689686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Finding the best angle: pigeons (Columba livia) weight angular information more heavily than relative wall length in an open-field geometry task.
    Lubyk DM; Spetch ML
    Anim Cogn; 2012 May; 15(3):305-12. PubMed ID: 21918871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. What is geometric information and how do animals use it?
    Sutton JE
    Behav Processes; 2009 Mar; 80(3):339-43. PubMed ID: 19084055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Whither geometry? Troubles of the geometric module.
    Cheng K
    Trends Cogn Sci; 2008 Sep; 12(9):355-61. PubMed ID: 18684662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Does constraining field of view prevent extraction of geometric cues for humans during virtual-environment reorientation?
    Sturz BR; Kilday ZA; Bodily KD
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2013 Oct; 39(4):390-6. PubMed ID: 23815384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Sex differences on a mental rotation task: variations in electroencephalogram hemispheric activation between children and college students.
    Roberts JE; Bell MA
    Dev Neuropsychol; 2000; 17(2):199-223. PubMed ID: 10955203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Control of spatial orientation in terrestrial toads (Rhinella arenarum).
    Daneri MF; Casanave E; Muzio RN
    J Comp Psychol; 2011 Aug; 125(3):296-307. PubMed ID: 21767005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.