These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22012152)

  • 1. Proposal for facial type determination based on anthropometry.
    Ramires RR; Ferreira LP; Marchesan IQ; Cattoni DM; Silva MA
    J Soc Bras Fonoaudiol; 2011 Sep; 23(3):195-200. PubMed ID: 22012152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [The anthropomorphic proportions of the face: an evaluation of the response to orthodontic surgical treatment of Angle class III].
    Savastano C; Craca R
    Minerva Stomatol; 1992 Sep; 41(9):373-83. PubMed ID: 1491654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Vertical proportions of face: a cephalometric study.
    Kharbanda OP; Sidhu SS; Sundrum KR
    Int J Orthod; 1991; 29(3-4):6-8. PubMed ID: 1802874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The pattern of facial skeletal growth and its relationship to various common indexes of maturation.
    Mellion ZJ; Behrents RG; Johnston LE
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Jun; 143(6):845-54. PubMed ID: 23726335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Changes in the soft tissue chin after orthodontic treatment.
    Singh RN
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1990 Jul; 98(1):41-6. PubMed ID: 2363405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of facial proportions and anthropometric norms among Turkish young adults with different face types.
    Arslan SG; Genç C; Odabaş B; Kama JD
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2008 Mar; 32(2):234-42. PubMed ID: 17952492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Relation between anthropometric and cephalometric measurements and proportions of the face of healthy young white adult men and women.
    Budai M; Farkas LG; Tompson B; Katic M; Forrest CR
    J Craniofac Surg; 2003 Mar; 14(2):154-61; discussion 162-3. PubMed ID: 12621284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Facial height in Japanese-Brazilian descendants with normal occlusion.
    Vieira FP; Pinzan A; Janson G; Fernandes TM; Sathler RC; Henriques RP
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2014; 19(5):54-66. PubMed ID: 25715717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Variation of mandibular sexual dimorphism across human facial patterns.
    Alarcón JA; Bastir M; Rosas A
    Homo; 2016 Jun; 67(3):188-202. PubMed ID: 26852041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The relationship between the changes in three-dimensional facial morphology and mandibular movement after orthognathic surgery.
    Kim DS; Huh KH; Lee SS; Heo MS; Choi SC; Hwang SJ; Yi WJ
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2013 Oct; 41(7):686-93. PubMed ID: 23465640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Frontal facial proportions of 12-year-old southern Chinese: a photogrammetric study.
    Yeung CY; McGrath CP; Wong RW; Hägg EU; Lo J; Yang Y
    Head Face Med; 2015 Aug; 11():26. PubMed ID: 26271276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Facial anthropometric differences among gender, ethnicity, and age groups.
    Zhuang Z; Landsittel D; Benson S; Roberge R; Shaffer R
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2010 Jun; 54(4):391-402. PubMed ID: 20219836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The incidence of mandibular third molar impactions in different skeletal face types.
    Breik O; Grubor D
    Aust Dent J; 2008 Dec; 53(4):320-4. PubMed ID: 19133947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Jaw mechanics in dolichofacial and brachyfacial phenotypes: A longitudinal cephalometric-based study.
    Iwasaki LR; Liu Y; Liu H; Nickel JC
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2017 Jun; 20 Suppl 1():145-150. PubMed ID: 28643908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Is it possible to use cross-sectional and vertical facial measurements to establish the shape of the mandibular arch?
    El Haje OA; Pompeo DD; Furtado GC; Rivera LM; Paranhos LR
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2014 Nov; 15(6):735-9. PubMed ID: 25825099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The application and correlation of Pont's Index to the facial framework of three main ethnic groups in Malaysia.
    Purmal K; Alam MK; Moganadass DD; Zakariat NN; Cheong NW
    Aust Orthod J; 2013 May; 29(1):34-42. PubMed ID: 23785936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Variations in the Facial Dimensions and Face Types among the Students of A Medical College.
    Pandeya A; Atreya A
    JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc; 2018; 56(209):531-534. PubMed ID: 30058638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Comparison of mandibular and chin morphology in adults with skeletal Class III malocclusion in different vertical facial types].
    Shu Y; Liu J; Chen J; Fang CH
    Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2011 Apr; 20(2):191-5. PubMed ID: 21566872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Proportions in the upper lip-lower lip-chin area of the lower face as determined by photogrammetric method.
    Anic-Milosevic S; Mestrovic S; Prlić A; Slaj M
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2010 Mar; 38(2):90-5. PubMed ID: 19447641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Craniofacial and body growth: a cross-sectional anthropometric pilot study on children during prepubertal period.
    Cozza P; Stirpe G; Condó R; Donatelli M
    Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2005 Jun; 6(2):90-6. PubMed ID: 16004538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.