These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

59 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2201326)

  • 1. Breast cancer screening in women over age 50. A critical appraisal.
    Peeters PH; Verbeek AL; Zielhuis GA; Vooijs GP; Hendriks JH; Mravunac M
    Acta Radiol; 1990 May; 31(3):225-31. PubMed ID: 2201326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Results of MRI screening for breast cancer in high-risk patients with LCIS and atypical hyperplasia.
    Port ER; Park A; Borgen PI; Morris E; Montgomery LL
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Mar; 14(3):1051-7. PubMed ID: 17206485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Screening women at high risk for breast cancer with mammography and magnetic resonance imaging.
    Lehman CD; Blume JD; Weatherall P; Thickman D; Hylton N; Warner E; Pisano E; Schnitt SJ; Gatsonis C; Schnall M; DeAngelis GA; Stomper P; Rosen EL; O'Loughlin M; Harms S; Bluemke DA;
    Cancer; 2005 May; 103(9):1898-905. PubMed ID: 15800894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Minority report - false negative breast assessment in women recalled for suspicious screening mammography: imaging and pathological features, and associated delay in diagnosis.
    Ciatto S; Houssami N; Ambrogetti D; Bonardi R; Collini G; Del Turco MR
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2007 Sep; 105(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 17115112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Mammography screening for breast cancer in Copenhagen April 1991-March 1997. Mammography Screening Evaluation Group.
    Lynge E
    APMIS Suppl; 1998; 83():1-44. PubMed ID: 9850674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Differences between first and subsequent rounds of the MRISC breast cancer screening program for women with a familial or genetic predisposition.
    Kriege M; Brekelmans CT; Boetes C; Muller SH; Zonderland HM; Obdeijn IM; Manoliu RA; Kok T; Rutgers EJ; de Koning HJ; Klijn JG;
    Cancer; 2006 Jun; 106(11):2318-26. PubMed ID: 16615112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Secondary prevention: screening for breast cancer.
    Chamberlain J
    Eff Health Care; 1985; 2(5):179-88. PubMed ID: 10271344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The role of magnetic resonance imaging in screening women at high risk of breast cancer.
    Warner E
    Top Magn Reson Imaging; 2008 Jun; 19(3):163-9. PubMed ID: 18941396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Screening and prevention of breast cancer in primary care.
    Tice JA; Kerlikowske K
    Prim Care; 2009 Sep; 36(3):533-58. PubMed ID: 19616154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. New approaches to the imaging, diagnosis, and biopsy of breast lesions.
    Esserman LJ
    Cancer J; 2002; 8 Suppl 1():S1-14. PubMed ID: 12075695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Service screening with mammography in Northern Sweden: effects on breast cancer mortality - an update.
    Jonsson H; Bordás P; Wallin H; Nyström L; Lenner P
    J Med Screen; 2007; 14(2):87-93. PubMed ID: 17626708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Screening for breast cancer with MRI: recent experience from the Australian Capital Territory.
    Price J; Chen SW
    J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2009 Feb; 53(1):69-80. PubMed ID: 19453531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Late-stage breast cancer among women with recent negative screening mammography: do clinical encounters offer opportunity for earlier detection?
    Mouchawar J; Taplin S; Ichikawa L; Barlow WE; Geiger AM; Weinmann S; Gilbert J; Manos MM; Ulcickas Yood M
    J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr; 2005; (35):39-46. PubMed ID: 16287884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Contributions of the epidemiological cancer registries to the evaluation of mammography screening in Germany].
    Urbschat I; Kieschke J; Schlanstedt-Jahn U; von Gehlen S; Thiel A; Jensch P
    Gesundheitswesen; 2005 Jul; 67(7):448-54. PubMed ID: 16103967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Contemporary management of breast cancer.
    Marchant DJ
    Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am; 1994 Dec; 21(4):555-60. PubMed ID: 7731634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The contribution of clinical breast examination to the accuracy of breast screening.
    Chiarelli AM; Majpruz V; Brown P; Thériault M; Shumak R; Mai V
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2009 Sep; 101(18):1236-43. PubMed ID: 19720967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A decade of breast cancer screening in The Netherlands: trends in the preoperative diagnosis of breast cancer.
    Duijm LE; Groenewoud JH; Roumen RM; de Koning HJ; Plaisier ML; Fracheboud J
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2007 Nov; 106(1):113-9. PubMed ID: 17219049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Problems in screening for breast cancer].
    Brünner S
    Nord Med; 1978 Apr; 93(3-4):63-4. PubMed ID: 643527
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Letter: Screening by mammography.
    Newell GR; Fink DJ; Holleb AI
    N Engl J Med; 1976 Jul; 295(3):171. PubMed ID: 1272336
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The debate over mass mammography: is it beneficial for women?
    Dilhuydy MH; Barreau B
    Eur J Radiol; 1997 Feb; 24(2):86-93. PubMed ID: 9097050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.