These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22013460)

  • 1. Developing a new dental implant design and comparing its biomechanical features with four designs.
    Rismanchian M; Birang R; Shahmoradi M; Talebi H; Zare RJ
    Dent Res J (Isfahan); 2010; 7(2):70-5. PubMed ID: 22013460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of implant body designs and threaded designs of dental implants: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Huang HL; Chang CH; Hsu JT; Fallgatter AM; Ko CC
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(4):551-62. PubMed ID: 17929515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Biomechanical analysis of alveolar bone stress around implants with different thread designs and pitches in the mandibular molar area.
    Lan TH; Du JK; Pan CY; Lee HE; Chung WH
    Clin Oral Investig; 2012 Apr; 16(2):363-9. PubMed ID: 21301903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The biomechanical analysis of simulating implants in function under osteoporotic jawbone by comparing cylindrical, apical tapered, neck tapered, and expandable type implants: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Xiao JR; Li YF; Guan SM; Song L; Xu LX; Kong L
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Jul; 69(7):e273-81. PubMed ID: 21367505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Influence of thread shapes of custommade root-analogue implants on stress distribution of peri-implant bone: A three-dimensional finite element analysis].
    Lin CP; Lu SH; Zhu JX; Hu HC; Yue ZG; Tang ZH
    Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2019 Dec; 51(6):1130-1137. PubMed ID: 31848517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Bone stress and interfacial sliding analysis of implant designs on an immediately loaded maxillary implant: a non-linear finite element study.
    Huang HL; Hsu JT; Fuh LJ; Tu MG; Ko CC; Shen YW
    J Dent; 2008 Jun; 36(6):409-17. PubMed ID: 18384926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Different short dental implants on the stress distribution in posterior maxilla: a three-dimensional finite element analysis].
    Li X; Staden RV; Hong G
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2014 Nov; 49(11):662-6. PubMed ID: 25622500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of thread depth and implant shape on stress distribution in anterior and posterior regions of mandible bone: A finite element analysis.
    Hussein FA; Salloomi KN; Abdulrahman BY; Al-Zahawi AR; Sabri LA
    Dent Res J (Isfahan); 2019; 16(3):200-207. PubMed ID: 31040877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparative Evaluation of Stress Distribution around Various Threaded Implants with and without Platform Switch: A 3-D Finite Element Analysis.
    Tomar GK; Garhnayak M; Mahapatra A; Das SS; Mohapatra A; Choudhury GK
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2020 Aug; 21(8):891-896. PubMed ID: 33568611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Biomechanical Comparison of a New Triple Cylindrical Implant Design and a Conventional Cylindrical Implant Design on the Mandible by Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis.
    Bayrak A; Yaramanoğlu P; Kılıçarslan MA; Yaramanoğlu B; Akat B
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2020; 35(2):257-264. PubMed ID: 32142561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparative study of stress characteristics in surrounding bone during insertion of dental implants of three different thread designs: A three-dimensional dynamic finite element study.
    Udomsawat C; Rungsiyakull P; Rungsiyakull C; Khongkhunthian P
    Clin Exp Dent Res; 2019 Feb; 5(1):26-37. PubMed ID: 30847230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Biomechanical Behavior of the Dental Implant Macrodesign.
    Lima de Andrade C; Carvalho MA; Bordin D; da Silva WJ; Del Bel Cury AA; Sotto-Maior BS
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2017; 32(2):264-270. PubMed ID: 28291847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of thread design on stress distribution in a solid screw implant: a 3D finite element analysis.
    Eraslan O; Inan O
    Clin Oral Investig; 2010 Aug; 14(4):411-6. PubMed ID: 19543925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Effect of Three Different Crown Heights and Two Different Bone Types on Implants Placed in the Posterior Maxilla: Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis.
    Cinar D; Imirzalioglu P
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(2):e1-e10. PubMed ID: 27004295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Biomechanical investigation of thread designs and interface conditions of zirconia and titanium dental implants with bone: three-dimensional numeric analysis.
    Fuh LJ; Hsu JT; Huang HL; Chen MY; Shen YW
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2013; 28(2):e64-71. PubMed ID: 23527370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of optimal taper of immediately loaded wide-diameter implants: a finite element analysis.
    Atieh MA; Shahmiri RA
    J Oral Implantol; 2013 Apr; 39(2):123-32. PubMed ID: 21905902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Finite element stress analysis of cuneiform and cylindrical threaded implant geometries.
    Cruz M; Lourenço AF; Toledo EM; da Silva Barra LP; de Castro Lemonge AC; Wassall T
    Technol Health Care; 2006; 14(4-5):421-38. PubMed ID: 17065763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The influence of implant diameter and length on stress distribution of osseointegrated implants related to crestal bone geometry: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Baggi L; Cappelloni I; Di Girolamo M; Maceri F; Vairo G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Dec; 100(6):422-31. PubMed ID: 19033026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of finite element results with photoelastic stress analysis around dental implants with different threads.
    Geramizadeh M; Katoozian H; Amid R; Kadkhodazadeh M
    Dent Med Probl; 2018; 55(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 30152630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The influence of thread geometry on biomechanical load transfer to bone: A finite element analysis comparing two implant thread designs.
    Herekar MG; Patil VN; Mulani SS; Sethi M; Padhye O
    Dent Res J (Isfahan); 2014 Jul; 11(4):489-94. PubMed ID: 25225563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.