These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22014464)

  • 21. Ultrasound velocity of trabecular cubes reflects mainly bone density and elasticity.
    Hans D; Wu C; Njeh CF; Zhao S; Augat P; Newitt D; Link T; Lu Y; Majumdar S; Genant HK
    Calcif Tissue Int; 1999 Jan; 64(1):18-23. PubMed ID: 9868278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The relative influence of apatite crystal orientations and intracortical porosity on the elastic anisotropy of human cortical bone.
    Baumann AP; Deuerling JM; Rudy DJ; Niebur GL; Roeder RK
    J Biomech; 2012 Nov; 45(16):2743-9. PubMed ID: 23058867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Simulation study of axial ultrasonic wave propagation in heterogeneous bovine cortical bone.
    Hata T; Nagatani Y; Takano K; Matsukawa M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Nov; 140(5):3710. PubMed ID: 27908063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The effect of ultrasonically determined anisotropy on longitudinal fracture of cortical bone.
    Han S; Medige J; Ziv I
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 1996; 210(2):127-9. PubMed ID: 8688117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Deformation of mineral crystals in cortical bone depending on structural anisotropy.
    Giri B; Tadano S; Fujisaki K; Sasaki N
    Bone; 2009 Jun; 44(6):1111-20. PubMed ID: 19437610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Effect of anisotropy on acoustoelastic birefringence in wood.
    Sasaki Y; Hasegawa M
    Ultrasonics; 2007 May; 46(2):184-90. PubMed ID: 17383706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A μCT-based investigation of the influence of tissue modulus variation, anisotropy and inhomogeneity on ultrasound propagation in trabecular bone.
    Pan W; Shen Y; van Lenthe GH
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2016 Jul; 60():416-424. PubMed ID: 26974585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Characterization of a new ultrasound device designed for measuring cortical porosity at the human tibia: A phantom study.
    Gräsel M; Glüer CC; Barkmann R
    Ultrasonics; 2017 Apr; 76():183-191. PubMed ID: 28107676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Modeling of transient wave propagation in a heterogeneous solid layer coupled with fluid: application to long bones.
    Naili S; Nguyen VH; Vu MB; Desceliers C; Soize C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Feb; 137(2):668-78. PubMed ID: 25698002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Bone elasticity and ultrasound velocity are affected by subtle changes in the organic matrix.
    Mehta SS; Oz OK; Antich PP
    J Bone Miner Res; 1998 Jan; 13(1):114-21. PubMed ID: 9443797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Studies of compact hard tissues and collagen by means of Brillouin light scattering.
    Lees S; Tao NJ; Lindsay SM
    Connect Tissue Res; 1990; 24(3-4):187-205. PubMed ID: 2376122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. X-ray pole figure analysis of apatite crystals and collagen molecules in bone.
    Sasaki N; Sudoh Y
    Calcif Tissue Int; 1997 Apr; 60(4):361-7. PubMed ID: 9075634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Ultrasonic wave velocity measurement in small polymeric and cortical bone specimens.
    Kohles SS; Bowers JR; Vailas AC; Vanderby R
    J Biomech Eng; 1997 Aug; 119(3):232-6. PubMed ID: 9285334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The effect of in vitro fluoride ion treatment on the ultrasonic properties of cortical bone.
    Walsh WR; Labrador DP; Kim HD; Guzelsu N
    Ann Biomed Eng; 1994; 22(4):404-15. PubMed ID: 7998686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Determination of elastic coefficients of bone and composite materials by acoustic immersion technique.
    Goldmann T; Seiner H; Landa M
    Technol Health Care; 2006; 14(4-5):219-32. PubMed ID: 17065745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Comparison of three ultrasonic axial transmission methods for bone assessment.
    Muller M; Moilanen P; Bossy E; Nicholson P; Kilappa V; Timonen J; Talmant M; Cheng S; Laugier P
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2005 May; 31(5):633-42. PubMed ID: 15866413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Effect of X-ray irradiation on the elastic strain evolution in the mineral phase of bovine bone under creep and load-free conditions.
    Deymier-Black AC; Singhal A; Almer JD; Dunand DC
    Acta Biomater; 2013 Feb; 9(2):5305-12. PubMed ID: 22871638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Influence of cancellous bone microstructure on two ultrasonic wave propagations in bovine femur: an in vitro study.
    Mizuno K; Somiya H; Kubo T; Matsukawa M; Otani T; Tsujimoto T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Nov; 128(5):3181-9. PubMed ID: 21110613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Bone quantitative ultrasound].
    Matsukawa M
    Clin Calcium; 2016 Jan; 26(1):57-64. PubMed ID: 26728531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Influence of viscoelastic and viscous absorption on ultrasonic wave propagation in cortical bone: Application to axial transmission.
    Naili S; Vu MB; Grimal Q; Talmant M; Desceliers C; Soize C; Haïat G
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Apr; 127(4):2622-34. PubMed ID: 20370043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.